[KC_Conspirator]

To my knowledge, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC hired to do their cyber security, is the only entity to provide an "analysis". No independent entity, was allowed to do any investigation, including the FBI, because the DNC did not allow them. Do I have this correct?

If so, any comments about the claims of Guccifer, or any company, or agency, is suspect.

If a company such as a large retailer or bank made these claims, they would be subject to lawsuits at the least.

[Theoria]

In Donna Brazile’s book about the 2016 election, she makes it clear that CrowdStrike is incompetent. It was mainly tech volunteers, ie FB and such guys cleaned up the DNC servers post ‘leak’. Donna had nothing but bad stuff for CrowdStrike in general.

[KC_Conspirator]

Amended, ThreatConnect, a company that is respected in the cyber community, claims that they were able to track the IP to Guccifer 2.0. However, and independent group did a cyber analysis and concluded that the transfer times were so fast that it had to be a locally connected storage device; ergo an insider job.

IF the story about an outside hacker is true, indicting this guy and any accomplices should be easy. If they are not doing it, it raises questions about the validity of their claims.

[Henry Hnyellar]

Look into the background of CrowdStrike. Things will become more clear.