Posted on 04/17/2018 6:02:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
About half the American people do not believe the mainstream media tell the truth. They believe the media are more interested in promoting their left-wing views than reporting the truth.
I am, I note with sadness, a member of that half.
Here is but one more example: The New York Times best-seller list.
As a writer (who, for the record, had a previous book on that list), I have long known it isn't a best-seller list, and I don't pay attention to it. But I paid attention last week to see if my recently published book, which opened up on Amazon as the second best-selling book in America, was on the list. It wasn't.
The book, "The Rational Bible: Exodus," the first volume of a five-volume commentary on the first five books of the Bible (the Torah), was No. 2 in nonfiction on The Wall Street Journal best-seller list; No. 2 on the Publishers Weekly nonfiction best-seller list; No. 1 on Ingram, the largest book wholesaler in the country; and, according to Nielson BookScan, the organization that tracks 75 to 85 percent of book sales, No. 2 in hardcover nonfiction. In fact, according to Bookscan, it outsold 14 of the 15 books on The New York Times hardcover nonfiction best-seller list. But again, it is not even listed on the New York Times best-seller list.
I was told years ago that The Times best-seller list almost never includes overtly religious books. I believe it but cannot prove it. I was told The Times doesn't even monitor Christian bookstore sales (though many Christians have bought my commentary, few of its sales thus far have been through Christian bookstores).
At least as suggestive of bias is that the No. 1 hardcover nonfiction book on the Wall Street Journal and Publishers Weekly lists, "12 Rules for Life" by Jordan B. Peterson, is also not listed on The New York Times best-seller list.
Is it a coincidence that Peterson is a conservative, and that I am a conservative and my book is a Bible commentary?
In order to think it is mere coincidence, you have to believe The New York Times more than reality itself, which about half the country seems to. While The Times occasionally lists conservative books and, very rarely, religious books, after comparing the list and the BookScan list, the Observer concluded in 2016: "If you happen to work for The New York Times and have a book out, your book is more likely to stay on the list longer and have a higher ranking than books not written by New York Times employees. ... If you happen to have written a conservative-political-leaning book, you're more likely to be ranked lower and drop off the list faster than those books with a more liberal political slant."
In other words, The New York Times best-seller list is not a best-seller list -- which even The New York Times once acknowledged. In the early 1980s, William Peter Blatty, author of the monumental best-seller "The Exorcist," sued The New York Times for only listing his novel on the list one time, even though it sold in the millions. In defending itself before the court, as reported by Book History, the annual journal of The Society for the History of Authorship, Reading and Publishing (Penn State University Press), The Times said, "The list did not purport to be an objective compilation of information but instead was an editorial product."
Yet when asked last year about the announcement by Regnery Publishing (my book publisher) that it was no longer referencing The New York Times in any author publicity, New York Times spokesman Jordan Cohen told the Associated Press: "Our goal is that the lists reflect authentic best sellers. The political views of authors have no bearing on our rankings, and the notion that we would manipulate the lists to exclude books for political reasons is simply ludicrous."
According to The New York Times, it is "simply ludicrous" to question why a conservative book and a religious book, which are the No. 1 and No. 2 books, respectively, on every best-seller list other than that of The New York Times, do not even appear on The Times list.
Here's a different view: What is "simply ludicrous" is wondering why the "fake news" charge against mainstream American media resonates with half the American people.
It is what the editors of the Old Grey Libtard are reading.
Dear Mr. Prager:
Do you not get it yet ? You have to PAY to PLAY.
NYT deliberately and intentionally suppresses anything that can help normal people. It promotes anything that can help wacko liberals.
Great book....
Way more than half. The FAKE NEWS MSM would love the American public to believe at least half the Bullshit they spew, but the real number is way lower.
The ones that believe the Fake News lame stream media are the ignorant.
I walked past the bookstore at our local mall the other day.
The only, and I mean THE ONLY book on display in the store window was the Michael Issikoff/David Corn crock of camel dung entitled "Russian Roulette", which, I assume, fully explains NW how DJT and the Russians stole the election from Hillary.
I didn't check, but I will confidently conclude that all Mark Levin books are face-down in the cooking section, if they are in the store at all.
I seem to remember that back in the day when Dr. Laura’s “Care and Feeding of a Husband” was burning up the sales records it was ignored by the NYT.
“The list did not purport to be an objective compilation of information but instead was an editorial product.”
I remember an interview I heard with the editory back in the 70s-80s. (Yes it was on NPR, but, back in the old days when they were actually fair)
She was quite proud of the fact that there was no research done at all for the list. She just made it up from the books she liked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.