Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Background check supporters should blame themselves
Las Vegas Review-Journal ^ | 6 apr 2018

Posted on 04/07/2018 2:50:04 AM PDT by rellimpank

Backers of Question 1, which mandated background checks on private-party gun sales, have spent the past 15 months complaining that state officials have failed to implement the initiative. They’ve pointed fingers at everyone involved except the guilty party — themselves.

A recent letter from Gov. Brian Sandoval’s office confirmed this yet again.

Last week, Gov. Sandoval’s office sent FBI officials a letter thanking them for agreeing to discuss implementing Question 1, which voters narrowly approved in November 2016. The initiative required private-party gun buyers to obtain an FBI background check. After that election, Gov. Sandoval’s office asked then-President Barack Obama’s FBI to conduct the background checks.

Mr. Obama’s FBI told Nevada’s Department of Public Safety to pound sand. Gov. Sandoval’s office has just asked again, and the answer remains the same.

(Excerpt) Read more at reviewjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; nevada; nra; rkba; secondamendment

1 posted on 04/07/2018 2:50:05 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The multiple signs in the photo with the original article overlook an inconvenient fact that “Nevadans have spoken” but it was really only “Clark County Nevadans have spoken” as regards how the vote looked by county.


2 posted on 04/07/2018 4:18:49 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

Tyranny.


3 posted on 04/07/2018 4:22:05 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Disingenuous OP. The real reason that the initiative was written “requiring” FBI checks was to dodge the financial impact statement that is required by law. Currently the Nevada DPS does back round checks. Asking them to increase the number of br checks done every year would require a budget increase.
4 posted on 04/07/2018 4:31:01 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

—and the only reason it passed in Clark County was the busloads of Spanish-speakers bused to the voting by the Culinary Workers Union and the SEIU—( the Harry Reid machine)


5 posted on 04/07/2018 5:06:29 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Suppose, just suppose, the FBI agreed to do these background checks. How do you enforce it? Currently, the checks are enforced by the gun dealer who has to match checks to sales. In the case of a private sale, there is no paperwork trail. How would a private parties document the background check? (Short of universal gun registration?)


6 posted on 04/07/2018 5:14:10 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

NICS is an unmitigated disaster that’s marginally operational. In other words, it’s fine like it is. Leave it alone!!


7 posted on 04/07/2018 5:29:05 AM PDT by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Does this mean that similar laws in Colorado are void?


8 posted on 04/07/2018 6:01:01 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

“Nevadans have spoken” but it was really only “Clark County.........

Thereby, only a “partial lie” by the fake media.


9 posted on 04/07/2018 6:38:25 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

“Thereby, only a partial lie...”

I don’t recall that line working when caught by my parents. They were binary before it was a “thing” - yes/no, on/off, right/wrong, etc.


10 posted on 04/07/2018 6:45:57 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Suppose, just suppose, the FBI agreed to do these background checks. How do you enforce it?

Mandatory registration which is the next step
11 posted on 04/07/2018 6:52:39 AM PDT by slumber1 (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
How would a private parties document the background check?

Sounds to me like a giant sting operation. Buy from or sell a gun to someone you don't know well, or someone you know well but has a warrant hanging over him--bingo! there goes your gun "privileges".

12 posted on 04/07/2018 6:56:34 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson