Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Take the Second Amendment First and the First Amendment Second
Townhall.com ^ | April 5, 2018 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 04/04/2018 9:06:30 PM PDT by Kaslin

We have talked a lot about the liberal assault on our right as American citizens to keep and bear arms for the defense of ourselves, our families, our communities, and our Constitution, but it is a mistake to think of a disarmed population as their desired end-state. No, that’s merely the first step toward the subjugation of the Normals. What they want is not only for us to be disarmed, but to be silenced.

They are not going to stop with the Second Amendment. Next, they are going to move to finish off the First Amendment.

They don’t want you to speak freely.

They don’t want you to have access to a free press.

They don’t want you to practice your religion as you see fit.

And when you are disarmed and silenced, and you are stripped of any god but government – the government they control absolutely and forever – then they will have achieved their dream. You will no longer be a citizen; you will be a serf.

We can imagine what an America without our rights would look like, and it is really bad.

Oh, that’s crazy talk.

Really? Let’s look across the ocean and see what’s happening there. The British have kindly given us a preview. They allowed themselves to be disarmed, but why would they need guns? Britain is totally safe – except London just stumbled past New York in terms of violent crime. Oh, and it has an epidemic of knife violence. And acid attacks. But on the plus side, the decent people are helpless.

In the view of the elite, that is a plus. When you are helpless, you need them, and you are compliant.

But at least they have freedom of speech . . . except no, they don’t. In recent weeks, some guy calling himself Count Dankula was convicted of a crime for saying something. 

For saying something

It was a joke, and a tasteless one, but he now faces jail for speaking words. Think about that. And the police agencies in a land that used to be a bulwark of freedom and human rights are on the case, tweeting warnings to others who might say something that offends the elite’s sensibilities that the bobbies are watching.

George Orwell would be all, “See, told ya!” if he was alive, except he’d probably be in the slammer too for saying things that are illegal to say.

Let’s review: In once-Great Britain, there are things that are illegal to say.

But not here at home. Not in America. Why, that could never happen here. Liberals certainly don’t want to limit your speech, just like they don’t want to take your guns.

Baloney. The left is intent on taking away your right to speak freely.

Take a gander at our college campuses if you want a spoiler into what America will look like in 20 years if these aspiring Castros and Chavezes get their way.

Try saying what you want on a college campus. Try saying something that dissents from the SJW gospel pushed by the pierced, tatted-up screaming weirdos that the gutless administrators cater to. State the obvious, that there are two genders, not 183 of them, or refuse to use ridiculous “gender-neutral” pronouns like “xir” and “xip.” See what happens. Do you think hugging happens, or do you think violent, unhinged retribution against the wrongthinker happens?

Let’s not even talk about due process in the kampus kangaroo kourts, because there’s nothing to talk about. Academic “justice” does not mean an examination of the facts and evidence, with the accused offered the chance to provide a meaningful defense that includes the right to cross-examine the witnesses against him. Yes “him,” because “SJW justice,” is not remotely like justice. It is, instead, a hierarchy of fake oppression narratives that dictates that the accused must be punished because of the difference between who he is and who the accuser is. Guess who is at the bottom and presumed guilty?

Remember, all this is not just tolerated by liberals. They think it is good that your voice is silenced. They think it is good that you can have your life destroyed not because of what you did but because of your sex or race or beliefs. This oppression is not a bug; to them, this oppression is a feature.

And it’s spreading off campus, into the real world, like gangrene. It’s not as far along as the campaign to leave you defenseless in the face of Democrat-friendly criminals and aspiring Democrat tyrants, but it’s coming. Look at Rosanne Barr, who is hardly a conservative but who dared to buck the elite’s prejudices about Normal people and refused to portray them as hideous, racist buffoons in the reboot of her show. Unforgivably, in the eyes of the liberals, it was a huge hit, thanks to those flyover rubes. So the elite is trying to destroy her.

Look at Laura Ingraham. She said something liberals don’t like, and through their agents in the big corporations – only an idiot believes that corporate America is still dominated by old school Republicans instead of eager Democrat allies – they attempted to annihilate her. And the liberals cheered at the thought that her voice would be silenced – including alleged journalists. There was a time when journalists at least pretended to believe in a free press, but one of the great things about the Age of Donald Trump is how the masks have come off. Liberal journalists hate the idea of free speech, because you Normals might dare presume to use it.

Liberals love the idea of shutting up the opposition. Today, it’s through intimidation. Tomorrow, it’ll be through the government.

It all starts with guns. Liberals hate the idea of you having guns for two reasons. The first is the fact that guns are the tools of free men, and when you have them you have the dignity that comes with the ability to protect your lives and your rights. They want to strip you of that dignity both because doing so will humiliate you and show you who is really the boss, and because they enjoy rubbing your uppity rube noses in your own powerlessness. But of course, you aren’t powerless yet, because regardless of their ridiculous lies about how an armed citizenry can’t possibly pose a military threat to a leftist dictatorship, they know very well that as long as you have your weapons you will never be their slaves.

Once your Second Amendment rights are gone, do you think the liberals will suddenly decide to be more respectful of your First Amendment rights? Or do you think they will accelerate their campaign to strip you of the civil rights that remain the last obstacle to their total control?



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; firstamendment; schlichter; secondamandment

1 posted on 04/04/2018 9:06:30 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Based on what I’m seeing, they are trying to eliminate both at the same time.


2 posted on 04/04/2018 9:08:51 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative ( An Armed Society is a Polite Society. An Unarmed Society is North Korea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Remember, an Armed Man is a Citizen, an unarmed Man is a Slave.

Liberals love them some Slavery.


3 posted on 04/04/2018 9:10:54 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative ( An Armed Society is a Polite Society. An Unarmed Society is North Korea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

They sure are trying to do that


4 posted on 04/04/2018 9:10:57 PM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

That is my assessment too.


5 posted on 04/04/2018 9:27:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“Liberals love them some Slavery.”

It’s unbelievable to me that the useful idiot libs think that they’ll be in the catbird seat when we are all subjugated. Maybe a VERY FEW of them will be, like the Russian government-types in their dachas near the sea. But the rest will all be milked and abused like the rest of us. The mainstream media, the gays, the minority ethnics, the feminists, the freaks... the will ALL be screwed. And all we’ll get is the pleasure of saying “I told you so.” &^%#^&%# tools.


6 posted on 04/04/2018 10:39:04 PM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The First has pretty much been gutted on almost every college campus.


7 posted on 04/04/2018 10:52:32 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Great article

Thanks for posting


8 posted on 04/04/2018 11:14:27 PM PDT by redinIllinois (Pro-life, accountant, gun-totin' Grandma - multi issue voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Control Freaks require censorship, to proceed with their schemes via central planning while disabling criticism. If nobody is allowed to point out their constant failures, they get to proceed unimpeeded. And they ALWAYS fail.

Political Correctness is censorship, sold 1 drink at a time.

Free speech is anethema.

The primary purpose of the 2nd ammendment is to protect the 1st. Therefore, it must be eliminated.


9 posted on 04/05/2018 4:01:17 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Trump has implemented Supply Side Economics!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In Orwell, the speech, relationships and arms restrictions were enforced for the very purpose of allowing to satisfy this castration of normal endeavor and conquest of the characters into acts of slavish resignation to consent in being a slave of the state, doing the state’s socialist jihad as cannon fodder to fuel the war with no end as a means for material salvation and feelings of conquest after having denounced a neighbor


10 posted on 04/05/2018 5:25:58 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redinIllinois

You’re welcome


11 posted on 04/05/2018 5:48:30 AM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

When one speaks of “a well regulated militia”.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” - 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

The one big difference between the militia of the 2nd Amendment and a professional army is the militia is not made up of full-time professional soldiers. Such soldiers could be used against the people as King George had used his mercenaries and Redcoats. Logic is members of the militia would be less likely to turn their weapons on their neighbors and fellow citizens. Such was the wisdom of the Founders.

Who are the militia? The 2nd Amendment also states “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Who are the “people” in this phrase? You\me maybe? Also if guns of the “people” are outlawed and the 2nd Amendment interpreted away or repealed... it would require force (or threat thereof) against “the people” (those mentioned in the 2nd Amendment?) to disarm them. Is that not the very thing the 2nd Amendment and the “well regulated militia” there to prevent? Where would “such men be less likely to turn on the population” be in this scenario?

To forcibly confiscate millions of weapons and ammo from possibly resistant citizens… could require much “gun violence” with many possible dead, wounded, imprisoned and maimed... a defacto civil war! Blood and carnage... all to end the “epidemic of gun violence” #RustyIrony.

The very thing the militias were created to prevent per Founders would have to happen in a LARGE way! Yes, there were no repeating guns in 1791, there also was no National Guard... Militias were totally STATE regulated, not part of the Federal government. It took a declaration of war to nationalize these militias. The Navy was the only Federal military force at that time.


12 posted on 04/05/2018 6:25:17 AM PDT by FiddlePig (The biggest threat to your sacred liberty is to not value it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett

You are giving Libtards credit for being somewhat smart.


13 posted on 04/05/2018 8:00:01 AM PDT by wjcsux (The hyperventilating of the left means we are winning! (Tagline courtesy of Laz.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
14 posted on 04/05/2018 8:04:55 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paal Gulli

Awesome post.


15 posted on 04/05/2018 8:05:54 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Totally on point. The entire Bill of Rights could be gone starting with the gutting of the Second Amendment. Look at Canada where pastors are being charged with hate crimes simply by preaching that the Scriptures do not support gay marriage. We are on the verge of that type of intolerance coming here too. Unless we rise up and defend our God given Constitutional rights, we will be living in a tyranny worse than that which sparked the American Revolution.


16 posted on 04/05/2018 10:18:45 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux

“You are giving Libtards credit for being somewhat smart.”

If so, I assure you it was unintentional. I believe they’d rather see us all enslaved rather than compete fairly with anyone. That’s why this younger generation is enthralled with communism and mediocrity.


17 posted on 04/05/2018 6:01:57 PM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

1st: mouth and tongue.

2nd: teeth and jaws.

Take 2 and 1 does not work so well.


18 posted on 04/05/2018 6:55:09 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson