Posted on 02/24/2018 1:23:40 PM PST by rktman
With the gun debate in full force after the tragedy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School last week, one Democrat representative admitted to using incorrect terminology for firearms.
Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., was confronted for his use the term assault rifle to talk about the AR-15, and he responded on Twitter.
According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, assault rifles can be set for automatic or semiautomatic fire. Assault rifles have also been banned to the public since 1934, according to Independent Journal Review.
One Twitter user pointed out the representatives mistake, and Lieu responded: I will keep saying assault rifle if I feel like it. I will not let you define what I can or cannot say.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
Rep. Ted Lieu (Criminal-Calif) ... what, Teddy doesn’t like being called a “criminal”? Well, that’s my word for “Democrat,” and I’ll use it whenever I please.
Did you ever think that if they banned automatic transmissions, 99.9% of snowflakes couldn’t drive?
Neither could a lot of conservatives, including me. I have tried several times; I simply cannot get the hang of it and there is no need to.
At some point in the near future, a cop will shoot a black man and then the whole narrative will turn 180 degrees. Again.
Does this mean we can call his “constituents” in California “illegal aliens” now?
I’m convinced most Democrats and other low information voters already think semi-automatic means automatic.
Water is wet. Leftists lie unreservedly and unashamedly.
Their God is Alisky, so this is a given.
I don't think assault rifles had been invented in 1934. I think the terminology originated from the StG 44, or Sturmgewehr 44. Sturmgewehr means "storm rifle" as in "to storm (i.e., assault) an enemy position". The 44 comes from 1944.
It would correct to say that purchasing a fully automatic weapon has required an abundance of paperwork, background checks and payment of a $200 tax since the National Firearms Act of 1934.
The Delusional Lying Left is fully saturated in the Marxist doctrine that the goal of tyranny justifies the means including lying and murder.
And there is your problem chief. AR-15s, AS MANUFACTURED AND PURCHASED, have only two settings and neither of them are AUTOMATIC. Therefore, they are not assault rifles because they cannot be set to "semi-automatic OR automatic". Bite me Lieuy.
And I’ll call him a clueless asshole and wifebeater. I will not let you define what I can or cannot say.
Go back to Taiwan, Ted!
“Born, March 29, 1969 in Taipei, Taiwan, Lieu immigrated with his family to Cleveland, Ohio.” Then he and his “family,” “re-migrated” to California.
you’d think his husband would fight back
A case can be made that the first assault rifle was issued in Russia in 1916, the Fedorov Avtomat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedorov_Avtomat
Selective fire, 25 round magazine, chambered for 6.5x50mm Japanese.
lol...
I really wish we’d drop the silly semantic argument about “assault” weapons. The left knows which one it wants to ban, and we have much better arguments to make. If all you can say is “it’s not an assault weapon because it isn’t select fire,” please just keep your mouth shut.
“...Their god is Alinsky...”
...and they hate Christians with a passion because Christians don’t worship humans and have no room for the likes of an Alinsky demon-spirit.
IMHO
..
Dims are fully automatic liers, cheats and thieves.
And need to be controlled.
If not banned entirely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.