Oh, you mean this guy...?
Posted on 02/04/2018 5:40:16 AM PST by C19fan
Looks to me like, overwhelmingly, leftist Hollywood types have ended up being the targets here. And I don't think that that was initially the intention. The irony is delicious!
Regards,
I also have been going to a woman doctor for about 8 years. I needed to find a new doctor, and she was highly recommended by my endocrinologist. I thought it would be weird but it isn't, and she's great doctor. I am male and am always alone with her during exams.
It depends on who’s paying
Were “he-said-she-said” situations really that common back then, a mile below the surface?
Please do elucidate!
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
50 years ago was only 1967.....
Even then the ‘open door’ policy for bosses etal wasn’t actually ‘MY DOOR IS OPEN’, it also meant If you and a subordinate were to have a one on one, best either leave your door open or at least have a witness. Couldn’t really ‘tape’ the meeting as the ‘law’ was kind of iffy when it came to wire taps and what constituted one.
PDT played that beautifully a couple of weeks ago AND the ‘other side’ proved him correct as it is the ONLY meeting he or Senior R’s have had that didn’t have ‘scores of leaks’ or misstatements.
After the ‘$hiitehole’ controversy/he said-she said travesty, PDT should have announced that ALL future meetings would be on the record -AT HIS DISCRETION and he may or may not tell you.
We have to start spinning this crap back on the Ls & RINOs etal...
Between the press and lying pols, I do NOT believe McShame is going through what he says he is AND yes the ONLY way I will believe him is when he comes out feet first, under a sheet - THEN I ‘MAY’ admit I was wrong but chances are I won’t give him the satisfaction.
I know it is wrong to wish ill on one BUT when they ‘ask for it’, it is very easy.
Yes. I love his character in that movie, can you imagine a movie being made now in which such a character would not be an out-and-out black hatted villain, instead of the ambivalent opportunist he portrayed?
You're not getting my drift.
Deep mines... mine shafts a mile or more underground... hazardous environments... men stripped to their waists... and you talk about having to enact measures to avoid any appearance of impropriety?!
There is a serious disconnect here - and I'm more than willing that it might be due to my ignorance - so please enlighten me!
Regards,
Like that won't be the man in 99% of all cases?!
Regards,
Yes, that occurred to me. An unscrupulous woman could find a way to influence another unscrupulous or weak person to support her false accusations.
Yep. All the fake feminists were up in arms when he made clear his policy but now there is not a peep regarding how absolutely correct he is.
Any man alone in a bedroom with a woman not his wife is a mark.
Granted, the mind set of people engaged in that sort of work - I was in Asphalt Paving - another COMPLETELY male field at the time and a lot of times I would ‘wish’ I hadn’t called someone aside to ‘further instruct him or point out how he was going against MY wishes - job wise’.
No telling what kind of ‘quotes’ and misstatements come out of such a session.
If you fire someone for cause, good idea to have good documentation and proof.
‘Secret’ warnings about not repeating the offense may come back to bite you in the arse.
For the most part the ‘undereducated’ people doing those jobs may want to whip your butt for firing them but a ‘war of words’ usually wasn’t in the offing. The ‘super intelligent (at least in their own minds) wouldn’t be ‘caught dead’ doing manual labor, much less mining coal or shoveling asphalt (other than maybe a part time summer job).
I started running asphalt crews when the tendency was to not necessarily hire the ‘toughest guy in the crew’ but someone who could actually ‘speak’ to inspectors and knew enough to order ‘50 more tons rather than 5 & one half loads’.
At the time the inspectors (at least the younger ones were HS grads at the least and some college).
Remember it was in that time frame that ‘they’ were starting to require some college for LEO types
Oh, you mean this guy...?
—sex had nothing to do with it then but the rules stay the same “don’t touch” and “have a witness”-—
no appearance of evil.
To the extreme feminists, be careful what you wish for, cause you may be about to get it - Big Time. The sexes will be redefined and newly segregated once again.
Hmmm..Does that mean the Boy Scouts can be just for (naturally born) boys again? Fringe benefits!
—yes-—and if the senior senator from Arizona stated that the sun rose in the east this morning, I would check it out before believing him-—
—yes——and the situations about which I speak were almost always about job performance-
—and an added complication entered the picture when women did start working underground. After the disciplinary meeting was over , a union steward (whose attendance was mandatory) would usually take the lady aside and explain to her that “ we can’t really do anything about this but. here is a number you can call in Denver and file a civil rights suit if you so choose”—some of them did that-—
Shared an office with young 20 year old women. I had a policy that the door was open all the time, and the blinds were never drawn. On young woman objected, and I said that it wasn’t open for negotiations.
The irony is delicious. We’re going to end up with de facto sex segregated workplaces. And women are going to find themselves being vetted before a guy will even consider dating them. Plus there will be added pressure since American men will increasingly look overseas and import their wives.
any complaint over ten years old should be ignored.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.