Posted on 01/30/2018 8:49:19 PM PST by SoConPubbie
I remember when clinton announced at the SOTU no nukes aimed at the US (deal with Russia) He let China buy supercomputers from cary and loral missile guidance technology. When he left office China had 200 ICBMs that could reach the west coast.
If you think the remainder of the 40 million will face enforcement, well, I have some swampland to offer you...
“Securing the border” (aka handing out teddy bears) is not the same as “ending illegal immigration”, as I am sure you know. We cannot give amnesty to one illegal until all the non-amnesty illegals are out and the influx of illegals is ended.
Re: “The first SOTU I watched was Nixon, most likely before your birth.”
LOL!
My first SOTU was Truman - on the radio!
We have only one disagreement.
I believe that massive legal immigration is an existential political threat to American Conservatives.
And you do not.
It doesn’t matter what Trump offered. He knows Dems are like the Palistinians, they won’t take a deal that gives them everything they want, let alone this one.
It doesn’t matter what Trump offered. He knows Dems are like the Palistinians, they won’t take a deal that gives them everything they want, let alone this one.
Something also needs to be done about the anchor-baby BS :/
That might require a Constitutional Amendment.
The Anchor Baby legal concept is based on the tortured interpretation of one of the anti-slavery Amendments that passed just after the Civil War.
need to get a case back to the USSC
I agree.
Pursue the appellate law first.
But, we need both John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy to vote for our side, which is always a coin toss.
I’m losing faith in Breitbart’s website and some hosts of the radio shows. They run around “hair on fire” about anything President Trump says that’s not everything they want. Then when the art of the deal is clear and turns out right, there’s no admitting they were not correct.
We need to have an honest discussion about this. Many supported Trump to shut this down, not to continue this.
People who care about the immigration of cheap labor into the country care deeply about the outcome of this issue.
We need more deplorable Congress people.
Read it and weep.
Trump has already told the DACA illegals not to worry about the March deadline coming and DACA going away.
So what they end up with will likely be negotiated to be even worse than this.
We always say people should play by the rules and get in line, which is what these people have been doing under the rules which exist now. If we change the system going forward, I’m OK with them keeping their place in line, as long as they are vetted and don’t get any government handouts.
I disagree. I think this author makes a great case why...
President Trump has boxed in the left beautifully.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3626942/posts
I would agree to one deal only.. after every inch of the border wall is complete and no anchor babies, only the DACA kids who applied originally. None of their kids or family members, just the applicant.
Ummmm - that’s why he called it one of his four pillars and then laid them out in a sequential order... Breitbart trying to “Roy Moore” the Trump agenda????
You are applying the labels “compromise” and “incrementalism” to the same old same old globalist GOPe-Democratic-Uniparty approach to to immigration.
Encouraging one group to have small families and abortions is part of the same agenda as encouraging voluminous immigration by other groups.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.