She seems and looks like an idiot. If you are still on the fence with this scam, then we dont need this twit.
One can finger the scam as a scam without deeming the question to be soluble by human methods.
Maybe Trump had her say that to weed them out.
Is he that dastardly?
I thought her response to the query put forth by the Texas Observer reporter was fairly mild and sane:
On climate change, she said that there is “still a lot of ongoing science” and that the “climate has been changing since the dawn of time, well before humans ever inhabited the Earth.”
“I think it’s possible that humans have some type of impact on climate change,” she said. “I just don’t know the extent of that.”
I think it is possible that I could change the pH of the ocean by spitting into it, I just don't know the extent of the change (e.g., would the change be the number 1 preceded by a gazillion zeroes and a decimal place, or would the number of zeroes be a googleplex cubed ... or some similar number - approaching zero. I just don't know the extent of this possibility).
It seemed like a fair PC reply - without smacking the reporter on the side of the head and telling them to stop asking stupid questions.