Posted on 12/29/2017 12:59:20 AM PST by 4Runner
There’s a difference with dogs versus wild animals. Dogs have had a long relationship with Western man and their loyalty and courage is legend. The dog has been the only wild animal to willingly side with man against the element and to assist man in his varied efforts to remain civilized. To place dogs in the same category as wild animals or animals that are raised for food is total ignorance of Western culture. If you are civilized you don’t return the loyalty and the companionship and the devotion of a dog with indifference and callousness. Which is what Hispanics do.
bump
A mish-mash.
It goes more like:
My grandfather died peacefully in his sleep,
not like his screaming passengers.
Dogs once served a purpose. They lived outside and did their job. Now, they sadly are just replacements for human companionship. A society where the family no longer lives near one another. I’ve seen this played out multiple times in my own extended family. Dogs take the place of children and grandchildren.
“Why so coy? Why not just come out and say “...in Korea”?
Not Korea. Northern Michigan and I do not know which one of the three tribes who were part of the Council of Three Fires.
“A soulless, brutal culture.”
Visigoths. That one a Visigoth crossed with an Aztec.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.