Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCabe draws blank on Democrats’ funding of Trump dossier, new subpoenas planned
FoxNews ^ | 12/20/2017 | James Rosen

Posted on 12/20/2017 12:32:57 PM PST by gubamyster

EXCLUSIVE: Congressional investigators tell Fox News that Tuesday’s seven-hour interrogation of Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe contained numerous conflicts with the testimony of previous witnesses, prompting the Republican majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee to decide to issue fresh subpoenas next week on Justice Department and FBI personnel.

While HPSCI staff would not confirm who will be summoned for testimony, all indications point to demoted DOJ official Bruce G. Ohr and FBI General Counsel James A. Baker, who accompanied McCabe, along with other lawyers, to Tuesday’s HPSCI session.

The issuance of a subpoena against the Justice Department’s top lawyer could provoke a new constitutional clash between the two branches, even worse than the months-long tug of war over documents and witnesses that has already led House Speaker Paul Ryan to accuse DOJ and FBI of “stonewalling” and HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., to threaten contempt-of-Congress citations against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray.

“It’s hard to know who’s telling us the truth,” said one House investigator after McCabe’s questioning.

Fox News is told that several lawmakers participated in the questioning of McCabe, led chiefly by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.

Sources close to the investigation say that McCabe was a “friendly witness” to the Democrats in the room, who are said to have pressed the deputy director, without success, to help them build a case against President Trump for obstruction of justice in the Russia-collusion probe. “If he could have, he would have,” said one participant in the questioning.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 115th; andrewmccabe; brucegohr; california; christopersteele; christopherwray; clinton; devinnunes; dossier; fbi; fusiongps; jamesbaker; jamescomey; mccabe; paulryan; peterstrzok; robertmueller; rodrosenstein; rosenreport; southcarolina; steele; steeledossier; treygowdy; trumprussia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2017 12:32:57 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
“It’s hard to know who’s telling us the truth,”

None of them....................

2 posted on 12/20/2017 12:36:32 PM PST by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

The reason McCabe “can’t recall” is that he knew the “dossier” was Democrat opposition research before it was used as a FISA court warrant intelligence document.


3 posted on 12/20/2017 12:38:16 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

So who lied? Comey,Rosenstein, McCabe, Wray or Mueller?

My bet...Every freaking one of them!


4 posted on 12/20/2017 12:38:38 PM PST by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
I knew this was coming. McCabe is essentially saying that the FBI stands by the veracity of the dossier. This has been the Dem meme all along. McCabe could not provide any specific corroboration except for the Cater Page trips to Russia. No doubt this was used to get the FISA warrant.
5 posted on 12/20/2017 12:38:59 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Oh boy:

"Investigators say McCabe recounted to the panel how hard the FBI had worked to verify the contents of the anti-Trump “dossier” and stood by its credibility. But when pressed to identify what in the salacious document the bureau had actually corroborated, the sources said, McCabe cited only the fact that Trump campaign adviser Carter Page had traveled to Moscow. Beyond that, investigators said, McCabe could not even say that the bureau had verified the dossier’s allegations about the specific meetings Page supposedly held in Moscow.

The sources said that when asked when he learned that the dossier had been funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, McCabe claimed he could not recall – despite the reported existence of documents with McCabe’s own signature on them establishing his knowledge of the dossier’s financing and provenance."

6 posted on 12/20/2017 12:40:03 PM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

He went to the Hillary Clinton school of “I Don’t Recall.”


7 posted on 12/20/2017 12:40:37 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
"“It’s hard to know who’s telling us the truth,” said one House investigator after McCabe’s questioning. "

It's not an impossibility that ALL of them are liars.

8 posted on 12/20/2017 12:41:39 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

These hearings ought to be public. Because it is impossible to determine who is lying, no one will be prosecuted, anyway. Let the public hear the contradictions and see for themselves what a bunch of lyers these people are.


9 posted on 12/20/2017 12:42:11 PM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
Investigators say McCabe recounted to the panel how hard the FBI had worked to verify the contents of the anti-Trump “dossier” and stood by its credibility. But when pressed to identify what in the salacious document the bureau had actually corroborated, the sources said, McCabe cited only the fact that Trump campaign adviser Carter Page had traveled to Moscow. Beyond that, investigators said, McCabe could not even say that the bureau had verified the dossier’s allegations about the specific meetings Page supposedly held in Moscow.

The money sentence. The FBI stands by the veracity of the dossier.

10 posted on 12/20/2017 12:43:41 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51

I saw a Democrat basically tip their had a few weeks back. Wish I had documented it better.

He was trashing the Republicans for not being on the same page. He went on to trash them specifically for not sending out daily memos so they could coordinate their attacks, strategies. We know they do it to coordinate language, key words and talking points too.

In this climate, they now want us to believe they don’t contact each other and devise defense strategies, lying in unison by design.

Good luck with that.

As you and others have stated, they are all lying and by design. They work very hard at it.


11 posted on 12/20/2017 12:44:05 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51

I’ll bet the one common thread- the common lie - opened the door to exponential abuses by each of the individuals as they pushed the envelope base on the common lie seed. Thusly, no one wants to talk.


12 posted on 12/20/2017 12:48:06 PM PST by himno hero (hadnuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: djpg

They are not public because they involve national security matters..................


13 posted on 12/20/2017 12:48:47 PM PST by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: gubamyster

Snakes all. This is the legacy of Obama still at work.


15 posted on 12/20/2017 12:52:02 PM PST by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

He might be up for some tragic accident, like repeatedly shooting himself in the temple or his brakes could fail, etc. He needs to be on alert, IMHO.


16 posted on 12/20/2017 12:54:22 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabar

The money sentence.
++++
Indeed. THE FBI STANDS BY THE CREDIBILITY OF THE DOSSIER.

It will be about all we hear about this meeting from the MSM. Assuming we hear anything at all. And we will never hear from them that he could only name one very unimportant example of a verification.


17 posted on 12/20/2017 12:55:20 PM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

18 posted on 12/20/2017 12:56:13 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

plotting to overthrow a duly elected representative of the people would involve national security.


19 posted on 12/20/2017 12:57:34 PM PST by wiggen (#JeSuisCharlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kabar

The money sentence. The FBI stands by the veracity of the dossier.

They have to, justifies the FISA warrant.


20 posted on 12/20/2017 12:58:30 PM PST by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson