Posted on 11/20/2017 8:11:14 AM PST by Kaslin
In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein revelations, Anita Hill's star is shining brighter than it has since the riveting Hill-Thomas hearings in 1991. "Hill gave voice to the silent indignities endured by women," wrote Jonathan Capehart recently in the Washington Post – Capehart being one of many pundits who made such claims without any substantiation whatsoever. In fact, the actual evidence strongly suggests that if Hill ever suffered indignities, Clarence Thomas did not inflict them.
Some background is in order. Speaking to a NOW convention in July 1991, shortly after Thomas's nomination to the Supreme Court, radical feminist Florynce Kennedy announced, "We're going to Bork him. We're going to kill him politically."
The woman who would orchestrate the Thomas assassination watched the news of his nomination at her California home. "He's the one," Susan Hoerchner screamed to her husband. He was the one, Hoerchner recalled, whom her Yale Law school pal Anita Hill had fingered as a hound dog back in 1981 when both she and Hill worked in Washington. Ten years later, Hoerchner was serving as a low-level judge in California, but Hill had moved on to the law school of Oral Roberts University in her native Oklahoma, a humble teaching post Thomas had helped her secure.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
High Tech Lynching. Orchestrated by the Democrats - the party of lynching.
The REAL question should go to McCain and McConnell...why did they vote to confirm Thomas yet they’re venomous toward Moore - when the fact set in both cases is almost identical, i.e., verbal?
Anita Hill was a second stringer of an attorney that Judge Thomas tried to help. She fell in love with the man. But he married a red haired white woman. She was trying to get him for that anonymously but was outed by the femenazis.
"Hill gave voice to the silent indignities endured by women," wrote Jonathan Capehart recently in the Washington Post – Capehart being one of many pundits who made such claims without any substantiation whatsoever.How about Slick Willie? That happened after Anita Hill's allegations. Did that give voice to silent indignities? What a [redacted] shill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.