Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists claim DEFINITIVE PROOF that global warming is man-made and getting WORSE
Express.co.uk ^ | November 14, 2017 | By JON ROGERS

Posted on 11/14/2017 8:23:56 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

A new study for the journal of the American Geophysical Union, Earth’s Future, looked at global annual temperature records from 1861 to 2005 which indicated there were 17 record hot years over that period.

Then experts examined whether or not those temperature records were being broken more frequently and if so, whether humans were to blame for that rise.

The findings show human influence has greatly increased the likelihood of record-breaking hot years occurring on a global scale.

Without human-caused climate change, there should only have been an average of seven record hot years from 1861 to 2005, not 17.

Further, human-caused climate change at least doubled the odds of having a record-breaking hot year from 1926 to 1945 and from 1967 onwards, according to the new study.

The scientists predict that if greenhouse gas emissions continue at high levels, the chance of experiencing new global temperature records will continue to increase.

Experts predict that by 2100, on average, every other year will break records.

Andrew Goebbels, a climate extremes research fellow at the University of Melbourne in Australia and lead author of the new study, said the new findings show how climate change is visibly influencing Earth’s temperature.

He said: “We can now specifically say climate change is increasing the chance of observing a new temperature record each year.

“It’s important to point out we shouldn’t be seeing these records if human activity weren’t contributing to global warming.”

(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hoax; propaganda; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

All bogus until they stop using adjusted data. It is not scientifically valid to adjust the data then say the data supports a conclusion. That data has been adjusted to support the conclusion.

Non-adjusted data records show no warming and that the hottest period was in the 1930’s long before man made influences could have been involved.


21 posted on 11/14/2017 8:38:48 AM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

22 posted on 11/14/2017 8:41:36 AM PST by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gotta remember to NOT count those other millions of years of up and down cycles cause there was no one to "record" it. Fidiots!🖕🏻💸🏭
23 posted on 11/14/2017 8:43:04 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Without human-caused climate change, there should only have been an average of seven record hot years from 1861 to 2005, not 17.

Now why did they leave out the Medieval Warming Period when the Vikings colonized and FARMED GREENLAND, currently under ICE!!!


24 posted on 11/14/2017 8:45:48 AM PST by eyeamok (Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I think they earth is about to perish, and its only hope of survival is that humans pick up the pace on anthropological climate change.

We need more coal factories. Less recycling. Higher emissions engines.

Together we can up our game and pull the planet back from the brink of destruction.


25 posted on 11/14/2017 8:50:29 AM PST by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The Proof is always Top Secret and they never tell you


26 posted on 11/14/2017 8:50:53 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

All land based measurements are grossly inaccurate and invalid.

The only measurements that are valid is the satellite data from NASA - which shows no change for over 15 years.


27 posted on 11/14/2017 8:50:58 AM PST by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

ROTFL. It depends on what you definition of “scientist” is. Environmental activists are not scientists. They let their politics and greed override scientific fact.


28 posted on 11/14/2017 8:52:52 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (2017 - The year the liberals' "sexual revolution" strikes back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I have a masters degree in math and have taken three
statistics courses in college from multiple departments. The assertion: “Without human-caused climate change, there should only have been an average of seven record hot years from 1861 to 2005, not 17.” is complete nonsense on several levels.


29 posted on 11/14/2017 8:55:46 AM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

30 posted on 11/14/2017 9:00:06 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

“Andrew Goebbels, a climate extremes research fellow...”

Full self-parody status for the man-made climate change cabal now attained.


31 posted on 11/14/2017 9:04:00 AM PST by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
...at least doubled the odds of having a record-breaking hot year from 1926 to 1945 and from 1967 onwards...

Where's the expanation for the gap between 1945 and 1967? Are we expected to assume humankind took some sort of a break from releasing CO2 for a couple of decades?

32 posted on 11/14/2017 9:06:21 AM PST by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

These anti-science morons mainly are seeking to steal more grant money. Criminal frauds .


33 posted on 11/14/2017 9:06:31 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

These scientists also say the planet is billions of years old, which makes their 150 years of “annual temperature records” a statistically insignificant sample size.

Can’t have it both ways, boys.


34 posted on 11/14/2017 9:13:26 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Andrew Goebbels, a climate extremes research fellow at the University of Melbourne in Australia and lead author of the new study...”

Unfortunate name ya got there, Mate!


35 posted on 11/14/2017 9:18:09 AM PST by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

36 posted on 11/14/2017 9:20:17 AM PST by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How many record hot years were there during the advent of the Roman Warm Period, or the Medieval Warm Period?


37 posted on 11/14/2017 9:27:48 AM PST by henkster (The View: A psychiatric group therapy session where the shrink has stepped out of the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Without human-caused climate change, there should only have been an average of seven record hot years from 1861 to 2005, not 17.

Don't disregard the elephant in the Solar System.


38 posted on 11/14/2017 9:38:36 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Odds are that slot machine will pay off big soon. Just you watch.


39 posted on 11/14/2017 9:48:39 AM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yup. All indications are we are entering a new mini ice age


40 posted on 11/14/2017 10:02:56 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson