Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Unfriendly Skies
Townhall.com ^ | November 9, 2017 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 11/09/2017 7:41:22 AM PST by Kaslin

When pollsters survey Americans' views about specific companies, cable television providers -- both large conglomerates and smaller regional players -- compose the absolute dregs of the results. Comcast, in particular, has frequently been dubbed America's "most hated company" from the results of these surveys.

It's not so hard to understand why this is: lack of competition. Thanks to government deals, most people have one or maybe two options for cable TV and Internet. From a purely profit-driven perspective, there's not a lot of incentive to spend money ensuring the customer experience is fantastic. We’re all familiar with the “4-hour service window” cable companies are infamous for missing. Anyone who has experienced it would gladly trade the credit on their bill they receive when they miss it for the time wasted waiting back.

The CEO of Delta Airlines, Ed Bastian, would apparently like to bring the already low-level of service U.S. airline companies are providing down the Comcast-level dregs.

It’s been a tough time for airlines lately. When not beating up customers or kicking families off planes, they’re nickel and diming passengers to death. Having flown recently, I can attest to the sympathy a passenger has for cattle stuffed into a small box from the moment you enter the line for the TSA security check to the moment you leave your destination airport. Flying has become a cross between a colonoscopy and a competition to destroy your knees.

It was that experience that piqued my interest on this subject. I discovered that rather than trying to improve their service, Bastian has emerged as a leading champion of airline consolidation, bringing it closer in line with cable service in that regard. He recently described less competition as "unambiguously great" for consumers. “The quality of the [US airline] business is unlike ever before," he added, according to Travel Weekly. You’d almost think the guy doesn’t use his own service.

He even bragged about the billions Delta is pumping into airport redevelopment in New York and Los Angeles. Sure, being comfortable in a nice, modern airport is all well and good, but the memories of that are wiped from your mind when the guy in front of you reclines his seat into your lap and crushes your legs.

But the space, or lack thereof, is less of an issue than the fact that buying a ticket for a flight is just the start of the airline’s journey deep into your wallet. As recently catalogued by John Oliver, the initial decision by airlines to charge for baggage in 2008 drew shock and outrage. These days airlines frequently introduce new fees, and raise their prices in tandem with one another.

Fees added $540 million in revenue in 2007, but rose to $4.2 billion in 2016 -- a 678% increase. Incidentally, this was also the period the industry came to be dominated by four large companies that tend to play nice with one another. Weird how consumers pay more when competition fades, isn’t it?

Now, if Bastian and his peers were just ruthless capitalists striving for profits, you could almost understand this, even if it's bad for consumers. On the contrary, Delta and the other US companies are currently engaged in a well-funded lobbying effort to kill off foreign competitors attempting to enter the US market.

The big airlines have retained Obama operatives like Anita Dunn and Jill Zuckman to push the Trump administration to deny Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etiad Airways the right to land in US airports, purportedly because those airlines are subsidized by their governments.

First of all, this is like Alex Rodriguez calling Barry Bonds a “juicer.” How many times have airlines been bailed out by the government? They can't pay their pensions? Bailout. Company goes bankrupt? Bailout. Not to mention the $15 billion bailout airlines got after 9/11. Now they want a bailout from competition.

Notably, the younger, nimbler US airlines like Southwest and Spirit Airlines have declined to join Delta, United and American in their attempt at crony capitalism.

The kicker for Delta is, while lobbying to use the power of the US government to protect themselves, they were recently exposed as trying to buy foreign-subsidized airplanes on the cheap rather than buying at market-rates from an American company, which has run them afoul of the Commerce Department.

So Delta, like so many companies these days, wants to use the free market as shield from government interference in their decisions, but is perfectly content to use the government as a sword against their competitors. Having recently flown Aer Lingus to Ireland, I can see why they’d fear foreign competition. Cable companies probably felt the same way when satellite TV became an option. It forced them to improve their service, and companies hate that.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: airlines; aviation; competition

1 posted on 11/09/2017 7:41:22 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I usually like Southwest. Just had a trip where both the flight attendants in the front couldn’t have cared less about service. As one came through with a trash bag, I asked if I could get another soda. Didn’t acknowledge my request, but later did come back with the soda. Maybe it was a racial thing though, as I am white.


2 posted on 11/09/2017 7:46:31 AM PST by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's not so hard to understand why this is: lack of competition.

I have lived in cities with three cable companies. They don't get any better. People shop on price and offerings, not on quality of service or meeting service windows. The same thing with airlines. Most people shop on price/convenience.

To the degree there is less competition, it is because the product/service sold does not lend itself to numerous players. It is not like bottled barbeque sauce where there can be dozens of players fighting for store shelf space or sales on Amazon. Only a handful will run lines on the phone line right-of-ways. If they lease lines from existing players (like competing phone companies do), it is hardly a separate offering. There are only so many landing slots at airports, so those airlines with a hub presence (e.g. Delta in Atlanta, United in Chicago) have a huge advantage.

And yet, even cable companies and airlines do have competition. The competition for cable companies is satellite, rooftop antennas and broadband Internet.

The competition for airlines is alternative airports, people's personal cars, and (in the Boston-DC corridor) Amtrak.
3 posted on 11/09/2017 7:53:25 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bookmark


4 posted on 11/09/2017 8:17:30 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My son and I flew Spirit last year, and were unimpressed. For a bargain airline, the tickets were somewhat pricy, and they charged for everything. Most airlines serve drinks and snacks for free, but not Spirit.

Delta, on the other hand, not only served free drinks twice on a 3 hour flight but also several snacks. In addition, they upgraded my seat (free of charge) to one where I had tons of legroom and actually had to stretch to reach my carry-on stowed under the seat ahead of me.

I’ll avoid Spirit in the future.


5 posted on 11/10/2017 6:09:12 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

I’ve never flew Delta, and I never flew Spirit and by your description I wouldn’t fly Spirit either. The worst experience I had though was in March of 1975 when I flew from Chicago to Germany with Lufthansa. You would not believe how unfriendly the flight attendant were. I swore I would never fly with that airline.


6 posted on 11/10/2017 8:55:38 AM PST by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ah, it’s a shame you had a bad experience like that.

We flew Alaska recently too, and had a good experience with them. After the flight, my son, the social media junkie, immediately tweeted “Alaska Airlines—four stars—would fly again!” To which Alaska Airlines responded that they are glad we enjoyed the flight and look forward to seeing us again soon.


7 posted on 11/10/2017 10:23:52 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My worst experience was with Virgin Airlines, flying from Brussels to London.
First the plane was delayed.
Then it was cancelled.
Then, after about four hours delay, they got us on to a new plane and flew us to London.
Without our baggage.
All they gave us was a drink voucher.
I couldn’t take out on my rage the Virgin airlines service girls, but I will never, ever, fly Virgin airlines again. Their service stinks on ice.


8 posted on 11/10/2017 2:58:46 PM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson