NYT isn’t really Der Sturmer, but…

INN ^ | 10/22/17 22:59 | Jack Engelhard

[Olog-hai]

Charles Blow writes a regular column for The New York Times. Julius Streicher wrote a regular column for Der Sturmer. Therefore, Charles Blow is Julius Streicher.

Are you following this logic? Neither am I. But it is the rationale that Charles Blow uses to argue that Trump is Hitler. I am not kidding…and Blow is his real name…and truly he does write op-eds for The New York Times…and The New York Times is indeed Der Sturmer, a proposition we’ll get to in a moment.

We’ll get to it once we follow Blow’s stream of thought, and how he manages to mention Trump and Hitler in the same breath. Blow’s most recent column comes with this headline — “Trump isn’t really Hitler, but the lying…” So that is Blow’s connection. Hitler lied. Trump lies. So they are the same. How does Trump lie? For that, Blow offers two main sources, CNN and MSNBC […]

… I’m not saying that The New York Times is quite the same, but…

Mainly five points.

1. The New York Times is openly hostile to Israel and uses propaganda masked as news to threaten Jews everywhere. Shades of Der Sturmer.
2. The New York Times is an advocate for only one party, the Democrat party, which mirrors Der Sturmer and its singular devotion to the Nazi party.
3. The paper makes no pretense of being objective. The Times is in business to tell only one side of the story.
4. Reporters must always be Liberals in thought and action… Obama-fearing men and women, plus Clinton cover-up artists.
5. Editorialists must always slant their opinions to be furiously provocative against Israel, against the United States, against Republicans and against Donald Trump, no matter how reckless and ridiculous it makes them sound.

Which does not necessarily mean that Charles Blow is all that, but…

[Mr Ramsbotham]

More like Volkischer Beobachter.

[dfwgator]

More like Pravda.

[2ndDivisionVet]

To paraphrase JFK “A combination of Italian efficiency and German charm.”

[Red Badger]

We’ve always been at war with Eastasia, Winston................

[sima_yi]

Actually, if one would take an article from Der Sturmer and replace the word "Jews" with "white male", the result would be indistinguishable from some of the screeds in the NYT and other leftist newspapers.

(And by "leftist newspapers" I mean almost all newspapers.)

[miss marmelstein]

No, The Guardian is.

[ClearCase_guy]

Or Goebbel's Der Angriff ("The Attack")

[Bringbackthedraft]

Julius Streicher ............................... He was the guy who yelled Heil Hitler all the way to the gallows. Now that’s what I would call real dedication to his leader. I guess Blow is dedicated to Hitllery Clinton?

[sauropod]

Charles Blow is execreable.

[foreverfree]

Isn't the Times owned by Jews? Then why is it anti-Israel?

ff

[SJackson]

Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

[Eleutheria5]

Yeah. Der Strumer had better artists. It gave one a lift to read about how der Juden were just about to take over the world, even if Hitler was the only hope to foil them. NY Times, not so much.

[SJackson]

Isn't the Times owned by Jews? Then why is it anti-Israel?

No. Actually they're publicly traded. They do employ Jews. Their chairman and publisher is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. who is an Episcopalian, as was his mother. His dad was Jewish, later converted to Episcopalian according to some sources. His grandfather was a Reform Jew who, in the 1930s was strongly opposed to Zionism and the establishment of a Jewish State. Short article, New York Times Column on Anti-Zionism a Reminder of its Own Publisher’s Past