Posted on 10/12/2017 9:40:21 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Or is it all just a sham?
The simple answer to the question is: Yes. But not because conservative men have abused them. Because they are forced to be silent, for various sociological and psychological reasons, about their abuse at the hands of the ‘in-crowd’ of liberals by which they are surrounded. And they lash out at any convenient target.
Let’s put this in a perspective that might make sense: A high school cheerleading team. We’ll call the town this takes place in ‘Hollywood’.
When the new freshman girls reach high school they’re SOOO EXCITED! They were cheerleaders in junior high and now they might get on the JV CHEERLEADING TEAM and even be VARSITY CHEERLEADERS! YAY! GO HOLLYWOOD!
So let’s follow the career of a freshman aspiring JV cheerleader named, oh, Ashley.
As part of Ashley’s tryout she’s invited to a HIGH SCHOOL PARTY! (YAY! WE’RE REALLY GROWN UP NOW!) And at that high school party she gets a little drunk and ends up in the morning in a bed full of strangers (various male varsity jocks) wearing nothing but her socks.
She’s embarrassed and shocked and hurt and doesn’t know what to do. Because she’s never had an experience like that before. (Though she’s rarely a virgin.)
Does she call them out? Does she report it? Will it affect her chances of being on the cheerleading team? At some point she might open up to a Varsity Cheerleader we’ll call, oh, Dame Judy D. And Dame Judy’s rather cold response tends to be: Welcome to the bigs, sister. No shut up and act.
And so Ashley is now part of the herd. She’s one of the ‘important’ people in high school. And she probably ends up being one of the mean girls who makes life horrible for the nerds. (Herein played by anyone with (R) after their name or anyone who can be defined as ‘conservative’.) And the reason that she makes life horrible for the nerds is THEY ARE THE ONLY SAFE TARGET!
If she lashes out at the jocks and Varsity cheerleaders who are actually making her life hell, the best she can hope is a punch in the face. Worse SHE MIGHT BE THROWN OUT OF THE IN-CROWD! She might NEVER DO LUNCH IN THIS TOWN AGAIN!
And when it’s her time to be the Varsity Cheerleader and some newbie freshman wimp is crying and sulking she tells her: Welcome to the bigs, sis. Now shut up and act.
And when that cheerleader finds a convenient nerd target (herein played by… oh, choose the R target of choice) she makes his life hell. Because she can. And she has to get the rage out somehow.
It’s all part of abuse syndrome, people. I’d wondered about it for some time but the ‘revelations’ about Harvey Weinstein just make it crystal clear. People who are subject to long-term abuse MUST find an outlet for the anger that bubbles in them all the time. They don’t, dare not for various reasons, lash out at their abusers. Think of children in abusive homes. How can they lash out at their parents who are abusing them? They are powerless. So they become bullies in turn.
Conservatives are an easy target. OBVIOUSLY they are worse than the ‘good’ and ‘decent’ liberal men who talk about how important feminism is all the time. Then abuse them. Conservatives HAVE to be worse! They HAVE to be! It’s just not getting reported, just as the abuse they are subjected to by the Harvey Weinsteins of the world is not reported. And since the people around them are ‘their’ tribe, they must, for various psychological reasons, be ‘good’ or at least ‘better’ than the enemy tribe.
This doesn’t mean there aren’t conservatives just as shitty as Harvey Weinstein. There probably are. But they are MUCH more likely to be outed by the news media. (Think of Newt Gingrich and divorcing his dying wife or for that matter the Access Hollywood tape. Interesting that name keeps coming up don’t you think?) Do you really think if a Republican senator was charged by a woman with groping her or masturbating into a plant, that the New York Times would kill the story?
In that way the liberal bias in media can be considered a God send to conservatives and Republicans. It polices our ranks. It is a major weakness for the Democrats and liberals because it refuses to do so. Thus you get the Harvey Weinsteins, the Weiners, the Spitzers who are all ‘protected’ classes until they can’t be protected anymore.
So do liberal actresses and models and all the rest really think conservative men are the worst human beings in the world? Yes. Yes, they do. Because they have to work every day with some of the ACTUALLY worst human beings in the world. And they have to believe conservative men are worse. Otherwise, there’s no point to being on the ‘good’ side.
Thus when Donald Trump said some needlessly crass things and alleged to have groped women, they immediately saw in him not just Harvey (all the rest of the abusers in Hollywood High not to mention Billy ‘I did not rape that woman’ Clinton) but WORSE THAN HARVEY.
Because Trump has to be worse. They can’t really be slaves to some of the most vile human beings on the face of the planet.
Got news for you ladies: Yes, yes, you are. You enable them every day and by doing so you not only support the abusers, you directly or indirectly tell all the hurt new cheerleaders: Welcome to the bigs, sis. Now shut up and act.
You’re blaming the wrong side.
Great article.
Yup. My daughter and I were discussing this yesterday. The women are full of anger and pass it along to the people they already hate. It’s easier and doesn’t damage their careers. Cowards, all.
Now I know why they are all on board for abortion... Who would want a child that looked like Harvey Weinstein!
She was completely virgin right up to the point that she wasn't. It's a one and done sort of thing, not like going to church for weddings and funerals.
Good article.
Yep, liberals are responsible for a lot of evil in the world.
But they blame it all on “right wingers”
They certainly never take responsibility for their negative outcomes.
It’s the difference, or reality, between the TEA party and antifa or occupy America.
And the writer's assuming these women's problems started when they got to LA. That long high school metaphor should have cued him into the fact that women who become actresses may have had problems with men and boys long before they got to Hollywood.
They are programmed numbskulls who have been conditioned by the MSM, and their grade schools/HS to follow the herd mentality.
So-that means they are too far gone for anyone to care about them. They traded off their ‘free thought’ and natural inclination to doubt and challenge, they squandered their objectivity and sold themselves along with their REAL birthright...that precious thing called ‘individuality’... JUST to be popular.
Do they really think they’d be reciting their abuse stories if HRC was POTUS? They’d be run down like dogs.
Wow. Clarity. Thank you, Ringo.
Nice piece.
There’s one other thing about conservative men that irks Liberal sluts: These men don’t want anything to do with these women, who are whiny, stupid, self-absorbed bitches.
+1 ABSOLUTELY spot on....
Hear hear.
Far as I can tell, they view sex as power, and they sold off their dignity in order to get more power and more popularity.
And then those nasty conservatives deny them that power.
It’s kind of like a girl I asked out once before I found out that she was a crazy leftist. She went on and on about how I was scaring her, and how I shouldn’t be so forward, and so on and so on. And I was like, ‘You could have just said no thank you.’
So I shrugged and moved on. At a later date, I was chatting with some friends and I basically told them that she said no, and so I just dropped her and started looking at other girls instead.
She overheard and you could just see her world dropping out from under her when she found out that I wasn’t interested any more, even after she rejected me.
Weinstein was a rabid Democrat supporter.
There were stories out of Hollywood that much of the loud anti Republican complaining and political activism from actors was really an attempt to curry favor with movie producers who are highly partisan Democrats.
Like Harvey Weinstein.
Now we are learning that Weinstein actually ordered actors and actresses to donate money to Democrats and show outspoken support for Democrats and criticize Republicans.
John Ringo the sci-fi author?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.