Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creation Therapy Works for Criminals
Creation-Evolution Headlines ^ | September 10, 2017 | David F. Coppedge

Posted on 09/12/2017 8:32:08 AM PDT by fishtank

Creation Therapy Works for Criminals

by David Coppedge

Prisoners locked up in cells day after day, year after year, would calm down if nature could be brought to them, says a new study.

Look at this photo. Does it improve your mood? What if you had nothing else to look at but bare walls?

Havasu Creek, by David Coppedge.

We’ve reported that hospital patients recover better when shown scenes of nature (5/20/01). Now, augmenting a report from last year, a project at the University of Utah found that nature imagery calms prisoners in solitary confinement and maximum security cells, too:

(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; inmates; therapy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
We need to maybe apply this to Antifa, as well.....
1 posted on 09/12/2017 8:32:08 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

It might work. Would take some chains and heavy anchors, but it has possibilities.


2 posted on 09/12/2017 8:33:35 AM PDT by ZULU (DITCH MITCH!!! DUMP RYAN!! DROP DEAD MCCAIN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

And why do we care about the mood of hardened criminals doing serious time?


3 posted on 09/12/2017 8:37:14 AM PDT by mad puppy (E PLURIBUS UNUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
We need to maybe apply this to Antifa, as well.....

Yep - put them all in cells with pretty nature murals....

4 posted on 09/12/2017 8:38:06 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

One: to make the jail guards job a little safer?

Two: because it’s the right thing to do?

Three: because (combined with a ministry of the Word), it might open their hearts to God?


5 posted on 09/12/2017 8:40:45 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Exactly, give them pictures of a landfill or an abandoned house. Screw ‘em


6 posted on 09/12/2017 8:41:44 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy
1) If we are sane at all, we realize that even hardened criminals doing serious time will one day be released back into normal society. We would prefer that they no longer engage in criminality when so released. Reasonable people may discuss, and even disagree, on how best to arrange that situation.

2) If we are Christians at all, we are concerned for the fate of the souls of even hardened criminals doing serious time. We would prefer that they come to repentance, and to saving faith in Jesus Christ, than to remain hardened criminals. Reasonable Christians may discuss, and even disagree, on how best to arrange that situation.

7 posted on 09/12/2017 8:41:58 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Four: Because almost all of them, at some point, will be released.


8 posted on 09/12/2017 8:42:40 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I read that as “cremation therapy” at first.

L


9 posted on 09/12/2017 8:44:56 AM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Hear comes the bear. Watch the bear decapitate a salmon in one quick slash. Yeh....relaxing...


10 posted on 09/12/2017 8:45:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Scripture prescribes death for a surprising range of civil crimes.

Thoughts?


11 posted on 09/12/2017 8:47:37 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain; fishtank

Excellent answers.


12 posted on 09/12/2017 8:53:35 AM PDT by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

And maybe yoga and aroma therapy? /sarc


13 posted on 09/12/2017 8:58:56 AM PDT by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Does the article/author/study address the likelihood of inmates defacing such images? smearing feces thereon? being incensed over what their incarceration denies them (viewed as “this is where you _could_ be, but you’re in prison - HA HA!”)? There are reasons they’re in concrete boxes with zero decorations.

Anecdote: I once worked for a major telecom company, implementing a collect-call/third-party billing system. For my first three days there, while trying to absorb the team’s terminology, I kept hearing the term “inmate” referenced, and couldn’t mentally reconcile the reference with the standard definition. I finally asked “’inmate’ can’t possibly mean what I think it means, right?” Yes it did - the system had a series of automated menus, which often ended with passing the customer to a live operator, but since inmates (identified by calling from a phone known to be in a prison) habitually abused any interaction with other normal people, they were denied the pleasure of communicating with a real human and routed thru some limited choices and likely had the call ended.
Moral of the story: prisoners habitually abuse what is “nice” for non-criminals. Giving them more “nice” often backfires.


14 posted on 09/12/2017 8:59:39 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I’m only semi-reasonable. :)

I tend to think of the victims first and how, say, a 20 y/o rape victim might feel about her convicted rapist getting pretty pictures in his cell to help his mood.

Paul had no pretty pictures during his confinement...at least it wasn’t mentioned. There are some criminals that can find recovery and a future positive life on the outside and we should focus on those. There are others that only God can mend. We waste very limited resources on them till He does.

Again, purely kicking around opinions....I would much rather jails put inmates to work. Labor. Something. Anything. Teach them a trade. if they work at it and play by the rules, they continue. If they cause trouble, they stay in their cage and rot. These are the hardened ones. The first timers; the clearly recoverable; the non-violent; they should be give a 2nd chance. We can agree on that at least.


15 posted on 09/12/2017 9:01:19 AM PDT by mad puppy (E PLURIBUS UNUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

16 posted on 09/12/2017 9:02:36 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy
I tend to think that properly caring for the victims of crime, and properly treating the convicted perpetrators of crime, are not mutually exclusive. And my limited experience (as a 'victim' and as a juror) tells me that our current system does a piss-poor job of both.

Paul had no pretty pictures during his confinement

As a Christian, I'd rather model my thinking after Paul than after his pagan captors.

I would much rather jails put inmates to work.

I agree. Idle minds and idle hands too often tend toward the devil's business.

17 posted on 09/12/2017 9:16:43 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

18 posted on 09/12/2017 9:18:28 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Teaching a trade, and supplying an academic education, are the only two “rehabilitation” concessions I’d back - as noted earlier, they’re going to return to society at some point (and if not, they still contribute to the society within the prison).

Such articles invariably fail to address the chronically destructive, those who are incarcerated precisely because they refuse to contribute & cooperate with others. At some point every individual has to choose productivity, and must learn that there is a limit to the contributions & cooperation of others in response - “solitary confinement” is precisely for that purpose: the unpleasant dead end where there is no beauty, no joy, no assistance, just decay & demise until either one repents or dies.


19 posted on 09/12/2017 9:23:39 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I have NO PROBLEM with the death penalty....

PS the Roman church is out to lunch on this one.... no surprise there, they’re out to lunch on most everything.


20 posted on 09/12/2017 9:24:00 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson