Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NorthMountain

I’m only semi-reasonable. :)

I tend to think of the victims first and how, say, a 20 y/o rape victim might feel about her convicted rapist getting pretty pictures in his cell to help his mood.

Paul had no pretty pictures during his confinement...at least it wasn’t mentioned. There are some criminals that can find recovery and a future positive life on the outside and we should focus on those. There are others that only God can mend. We waste very limited resources on them till He does.

Again, purely kicking around opinions....I would much rather jails put inmates to work. Labor. Something. Anything. Teach them a trade. if they work at it and play by the rules, they continue. If they cause trouble, they stay in their cage and rot. These are the hardened ones. The first timers; the clearly recoverable; the non-violent; they should be give a 2nd chance. We can agree on that at least.


15 posted on 09/12/2017 9:01:19 AM PDT by mad puppy (E PLURIBUS UNUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: mad puppy
I tend to think that properly caring for the victims of crime, and properly treating the convicted perpetrators of crime, are not mutually exclusive. And my limited experience (as a 'victim' and as a juror) tells me that our current system does a piss-poor job of both.

Paul had no pretty pictures during his confinement

As a Christian, I'd rather model my thinking after Paul than after his pagan captors.

I would much rather jails put inmates to work.

I agree. Idle minds and idle hands too often tend toward the devil's business.

17 posted on 09/12/2017 9:16:43 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: mad puppy

Teaching a trade, and supplying an academic education, are the only two “rehabilitation” concessions I’d back - as noted earlier, they’re going to return to society at some point (and if not, they still contribute to the society within the prison).

Such articles invariably fail to address the chronically destructive, those who are incarcerated precisely because they refuse to contribute & cooperate with others. At some point every individual has to choose productivity, and must learn that there is a limit to the contributions & cooperation of others in response - “solitary confinement” is precisely for that purpose: the unpleasant dead end where there is no beauty, no joy, no assistance, just decay & demise until either one repents or dies.


19 posted on 09/12/2017 9:23:39 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson