Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump will urge UN to impose North Korean naval blockade and oil embargo
The Guardian ^ | 09-09-2017 | Julian Borger

Posted on 09/09/2017 1:39:32 PM PDT by NRx

The US will embark on an aggressive effort to tighten North Korea’s isolation on Monday with a call for an oil embargo and a partial naval blockade.

A draft United Nations resolution seen by the Observer would also block textile exports and the hiring of North Korean labour by foreign countries. The American delegation has called for the UN security council to debate the draft, in an attempt to force decisive action following last Sunday’s massive nuclear test of a bomb, Pyongyang’s sixth.

The most striking language in the resolution authorises naval vessels of any UN member state to inspect North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned cargo and to use “all necessary measures to carry out such inspections”. The implications of such a resolution would be far-reaching. Any attempt to board or divert a North Korean vessel could trigger an exchange of fire.

As well as banning any exports of “crude oil, condensates, refined petroleum products, and natural gas liquids” to North Korea, the draft resolution calls for a prohibition on the import of textiles and an end to the hiring of North Korean nationals, on the grounds that the regime uses the foreign currency earned “to support its prohibited nuclear and ballistic missile programmes”.

Both Russia and China employ cheap North Korean labour. In Russia they work in logging camps and construction sites, helping build a new football stadium in St Petersburg that will be used in the World Cup next year.

The US draft measure would also freeze the assets of Kim Jong-un and the top leadership in Pyongyang.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blockade; korea; nknukes; nkorea; nksanctions; third100days; trump; trumpasia; trumpnk; trumpun; unitednations; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: NRx

Smart move by the President. Get all those ducks in a row.


21 posted on 09/09/2017 3:34:05 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Jimmy’s smiling because he’s a fool. The others are smiling because they don’t believe their luck in finding such a prize fool to put one over on.


22 posted on 09/09/2017 3:38:56 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRx

This will be viewed as an act of war


23 posted on 09/09/2017 3:42:33 PM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

It will start with a trade war and blockade. It will escalate to kinetic as the noose tightens.


24 posted on 09/09/2017 3:55:18 PM PDT by reardensteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Correct. Trump doesn’t shiv a git about the UN.


25 posted on 09/09/2017 4:33:20 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Really? Where is the UN air force and navy?


26 posted on 09/09/2017 4:36:14 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NRx
A lot of this depends on how China and Russia follow through on any sanctions. Only time will tell if they are serious or not, and historically they haven't been serious or have helped North Korea's nuclear program. Russia moving 1,500 people out of the way and China placing a few restrictions on trade is much more than what they have done previously.

Any North Korean nuclear ability that can reach Guam or Hokkaido can hit most major Chinese cities and a few Russian cities like Vladivostok. The idea that North Korean nuclear weapons are aimed at China and Russia as much as the United States has to be on their minds. I don't think they are happy about it.

27 posted on 09/09/2017 4:36:42 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Aren’t we still technically at war with North Korea?


28 posted on 09/09/2017 4:44:38 PM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

They didn’t veto the last batch of restrictions.....much to everyone’s surprise.


29 posted on 09/09/2017 4:45:13 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vooch

The war never ended, only an armistice.


30 posted on 09/09/2017 4:59:33 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Didn’t Jimmah Cotta receive the 2002 Nobel Peace prize for resolving the North Korean crisis? Things are so much better now.


31 posted on 09/09/2017 5:00:32 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

This will be viewed as an act of war
________________________________________________

That is the precise reason it doesn’t have a snowflake’s chance in Yuma of getting through the UN.


32 posted on 09/09/2017 5:05:32 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

A lot of this depends on how China and Russia follow through on any sanctions.
_____________________________________________________

Sanctions are no more than kicking the can. We can dally around with sanctions and “red lines” for decades, and accomplish nothing.

That is, if Fat Boy allows us to live that long.


33 posted on 09/09/2017 5:10:38 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: vooch

a blockade is a act of war

so first get a declaration of war from congress
___________________________________________________

With this congress that is an impossibility.

If I were in Trump’s position, I would call all of my most able advisors for a long and very serious discussion. I’d run all the best suggestions through the “Mix-Master” and see if a viable solution comes out, one which doesn’t involve blowing up the world. If no better solution than military comes forth, and because this has to stop now, I would not hesitate to do that though with much chagrin.

My personal suggestion would be to have a team of friendly operatives within North Korea do away with Kim as well as the six or so lackeys next in line of succession. Let the chips fall where they may and try to make the best of the resulting chaos.


34 posted on 09/09/2017 5:26:15 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gideon300

My personal suggestion would be to have a team of friendly operatives within North Korea do away with Kim as well as the six or so lackeys next in line of succession. Let the chips fall where they may and try to make the best of the resulting chaos.
___________________________________________________

For those who have seen “Operation Chromite”...

Where is Jang Hak-soo when you need him?


35 posted on 09/09/2017 5:31:24 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NRx

I’ve seen pictures of coal powered trucks in NK:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/how-north-korea-fuels-its-military-trucks-with-trees/
http://grist.org/article/2011-07-18-north-korea-runs-on-wood-burning-trucks/

Yes, fat boy could do something crazy, reminds me of Jim Jones; sometimes you have leaders who are off their rockers like Nero.


36 posted on 09/09/2017 5:33:52 PM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
"Really? Where is the UN air force and navy?"

It's called NATO.

37 posted on 09/09/2017 5:36:08 PM PDT by semaj (Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Naval blockades are usually acts of war. Even a partial blockade should send fatboy into orbit.


38 posted on 09/09/2017 5:38:02 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Yeah... this ain’t Trump, this is Mattis/McMaster/Kelly


39 posted on 09/09/2017 5:47:36 PM PDT by JP1201
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NRx

If the little guy fires a missile towards Guam tomorrow, people in Seoul better be ready for fireworks.


40 posted on 09/09/2017 6:07:33 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson