Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Some ideas really are too stupid for words. And yet people on the left manage to compose whole articles about them.
1 posted on 07/24/2017 8:42:16 AM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: NRx

What’s ours is ours.
Your stuff is negotiable...


2 posted on 07/24/2017 8:44:21 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

All you mom’s stuff belong us.


3 posted on 07/24/2017 8:44:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

I would take a match to it first.


4 posted on 07/24/2017 8:47:19 AM PDT by LeonardFMason (426)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

This was being pitched to me in first year law school by my contracts prof, back in 1987!


5 posted on 07/24/2017 8:48:39 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
most people agree that tax should facilitate transfer of wealth from those who “have” to those who “need”.

Most people are morons, or evil. No other way around it. Most of today's poor in any developed country aren't really poor by any true standard. The poor have access to things today that many people who grew up in the 1950s didn't have, rich or poor.

Poor is a state of mind.

Speaking of have vs. need. Charlie Gard needed care months ago. Those who have the power prevented this need.

Do we really want to go there with a 100% inheritance tax? Sorry Mr. Jones, but the government is a bit short this month, and you're worth more to us dead, than alive.

6 posted on 07/24/2017 8:49:40 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Why not just be able to abort your parents? Then there’d be no waiting around for the big payoff.


7 posted on 07/24/2017 8:49:45 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
Title: " Why not fund the welfare state with a 100% inheritance tax? (The mentality of the left)"

Because it doesn't belong to you !
Taxes have already been paid on this income, for the privilege of your gratuitous spending.
What are you going to do when you run out of other people's money ?
.. and you have to face the debit that you have run up ?
Welcome to Venezuela !

10 posted on 07/24/2017 8:52:51 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (The Fourth Estate has become Fifth column !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

How about putting the leeches on Snap to work and tying their tubes?


11 posted on 07/24/2017 8:53:03 AM PDT by mainestategop (DonÂ’t Let Freedom Slip Away! After America , There is No Place to Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

This was tried in the USSR immediately after the revolution. The results proved so unmanageable that even the Commies ordered inheritance rights reinstated.


13 posted on 07/24/2017 8:54:24 AM PDT by The Cuban (again Freaking French illegal immigrabta,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Democrats want to steal from traditional hard working Americans... it’s who they are... see tag:


14 posted on 07/24/2017 8:54:31 AM PDT by GOPJ (Angry old black women, elite scatterbrained white women and thugs: the face of the democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Let’s use Chelsea Clinton as a test case and see how it works out.


15 posted on 07/24/2017 8:55:16 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

The left has always been about government sanctioned theft.


16 posted on 07/24/2017 8:56:31 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Bill Whittle did a video a few years ago showing that the arithmetic didn’t work out; confiscating all wealth of the Forbes 400 richest people didn’t cover the federal deficit for even one year.

And the second-year haul from the new Fortune 400 richest people wouldn’t be nearly as big.


17 posted on 07/24/2017 8:58:01 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
Why not fund the welfare state?

We need to discuss that before going further. There's a difference between a "safety net" and a "welfare state". Why does anyone want a "welfare state"? I have a good guess on the D's private answer (votes from dependents) but get them to discuss/debate this in public.
Funding for a "safety net" as well as obligations of those in it are much different than a "welfare state". We need to agree on which we are talking about and funding rather than let liberals use whichever phrase they prefer at a given time.
19 posted on 07/24/2017 8:59:49 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

We need a special tax on journalists to help fix the damage they have done.


20 posted on 07/24/2017 9:00:12 AM PDT by willk (everyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

I haven’t figured out inheritances yet.

I used to be staunchly opposed to the death tax.

Then, I look at the damage that these nonprofit foundations, funded by the fortunes of the billionaires, do.

It would have been better for society if Henry Ford’s money was burnt after his death.

I can only imagine the multigenerational damage done by the fortunes of Jeff Bezon, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and Zuckerberg, after this money is in the control of leftist nonprofit foundations.


21 posted on 07/24/2017 9:02:18 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

“...... tax the Rich, feed the Poor, til there are Rich no more...”

Great plan - until there are no more Rich left to feed the Poor.

Then what?

Who will feed the poor when there are no more Rich to feed them?


22 posted on 07/24/2017 9:05:14 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
An accident of birth placed them in comparatively wealthy families and they’ve benefited from that their whole life.

By the same token, people lucky enough to be born beautiful and healthy tend to fare better in life than unattractive or unhealthy people. Therefore, government should surgically alter all healthy and all beautiful people so they're no better off than the less fortunate.

23 posted on 07/24/2017 9:07:19 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
"Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there aren't no rich no more"

Ten Years After (1971)

24 posted on 07/24/2017 9:07:28 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Let’s bottom-line what the liberals are really saying here:

All property IS the property of the state, and any so-called “private property” is merely on loan to selected individuals (according to historical quirks in local laws), and ALL property is subject to the recall at any moment in time, as the needs of the state dictate.


27 posted on 07/24/2017 9:10:57 AM PDT by samtheman (As an oil exporter, why would the Russians prefer Trump to Hillary? (Get it or be stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson