[mandaladon]

US law is now based on memos???

[mandaladon]

This is just the opinion of one professor! many professors have a different view! The damn NY Times is on an all out witch hunt to destroy OUR President and they don’t care if they take OUR country down in the meantime!

[jjotto]

Depends on who writes them. It would be a Supreme Court case. Indictment would have nothing directly to do with removal from office, which would still require the House and Senate.

[Bryanw92]

>>US law is now based on memos???

Not all memos. Just cherry-picked sentences from cherry-picked memos.

It is also based on court decisions from a single Circuit Court and not on legislative actions taken by Congress or by state legislatures.

But it is not based on enumerated rights in the US Constitution nor common sense, although “penumbras” can become law.

This is the heart of Progressive “governing”.

[Ron H.]

When I was in high school back in the 60's I was taught that a sitting president could possibly be indicted BUT the indictment must be sealed and remain top secret and should be considered a national secret UNTIL that president left his/her elected post upon which time the indicted would then be unsealed and s/he could be possibly prosecuted.

However I was also taught that prosecution under this scenario is merely speculation and has never been done in our nations history. It is uncharted territory for the lack of a better word.

[Leep]

No, but the dimwits are based on making retarded statements that have nothing to do with reality. Then they pretend, with the pleasure of the sicko media, who believe day is night and night is day, that it somehow applies to Trump.

[vette6387]

“US law is now based on memos???”

Yes, and they are “enforced by” the Federal Bureau of Matters!

[Tallguy]

I’d like to see the lawyer with the stones to stand up before the USSC and cite a “memo”... That would be something to see.