This is a great lesson in "unintended consequences."
1 posted on
07/18/2017 6:57:16 PM PDT by
grundle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: grundle
2 posted on
07/18/2017 6:59:31 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: grundle
I like to keep an open mind, but feel dubious of this research. At least superficially it has the scent of activist junk science.
To: grundle
Texas A&M University, economics professor Low credibility source.
6 posted on
07/18/2017 7:13:54 PM PDT by
T Ruth
(Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
To: grundle
Seems like the increase is slower than the population increase over the same period. And teen births increased more than abortions, so perhaps a less babies were killed.
7 posted on
07/18/2017 7:14:55 PM PDT by
JTHomes
(Government is force.)
To: grundle
teen abortions increased 3.1% in the following three years while teen births spiked by 3.4% in the following four years. I feel sure this study was conducted according to the most stringent scientific protocols, isolating the variables perfectly so that there were no viable alternative hypotheses for an statistically insignificant rise in abortions and births--other than that these bad things occurred because Planned Parenthood was cheated out of its fees--which were to be taxed from Texas citizens--for passing out human pesticides to underage girls and encouraging them to grow up to be trollops.
Have I translated correctly?
To: grundle
Mainstream press.
Ergo, fake.
Period.
To: grundle
This is an artifact of the necessity to cut funds across the board rather than targeting PP. The courts would not allow that. The cut in contraception was a byproduct of the cut to curtail abortions. Whether it is counter productive in the long run is highly questionable. People can learn to find their contraceptives elsewhere, but it takes time. Once they do, the abortion rate will drop back down.
To: grundle
The study comes less than a week before the Texas Legislature is expected to reconvene on July 18 for a special session with plans to further destroy access to reproductive health care and target Planned Parenthood. Gov. Greg Abbott has included a slew of anti-choice measures in his ambitious 20-point agenda, including a ban on private abortion insurance coverage and preventing local governments from allocating any tax dollars to abortion providers or affiliates. Awesome. V for Victory!
..._ ✌🏻️
12 posted on
07/18/2017 7:32:23 PM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Reset Underway!)
To: grundle
A new study shows abortion rates have jumped since Planned Parenthood was blocked. Years ago when I was taking Comp 1, we had to grade each others essays. This one fellow had written an essay, the premise of which was that Capitol Punishment didn't stop Death row inmates from murdering again.
It was stone cold stupid, both in it's premise and it's arguments. This bit of tripe from the Austin Cronicle is the same sort of brain dead stupid.
It turns reason on it's head by arguing that preventing something causes more of it.
Bullsh*t.
13 posted on
07/18/2017 7:40:58 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: grundle
"In a related study, sales of coat hangers have risen 37%....."
A lamestream rag in Austin, the Left-wing armpit of Texas. I call BS on it before I even read the article. Which I won't.
14 posted on
07/18/2017 7:41:32 PM PDT by
Viking2002
("If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck." - John Steinbeck)
To: grundle
It’s a great lesson in B.S. 3% is likely LESS than the growth in Texas’ population.
15 posted on
07/18/2017 8:02:27 PM PDT by
dangus
To: grundle; Jim Robinson; Morgana; cpforlife.org; little jeremiah
16 posted on
07/18/2017 8:04:37 PM PDT by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: grundle
Double-checked: Yup... 3% is less than half of Texas’ 6.9% population growth.
17 posted on
07/18/2017 8:05:54 PM PDT by
dangus
To: grundle
There will always be abortions. What needed to stop was US PAYING FOR THEM. Glad I could clarify.
Don’t accept the premise. If someone wants to incur the penalties of an abortion, that’s their problem - not mine.
18 posted on
07/18/2017 8:07:13 PM PDT by
TheZMan
(I am a secessionist.)
To: grundle
Yup... as suspected... cherry-picked data. The abortion rate in Texas jumped in one year (2013). She uses that year as the cut-off year, so it's included in her study. But even though she plainly had the subsequent year's data, she didn't include it. That subsequent year saw the rate of abortions plunge insanely far (2014).
Here's HER OWN DATA on the rate of abortions in Texas.
21 posted on
07/18/2017 8:21:46 PM PDT by
dangus
To: grundle
They seem to be confused about the point of fewer abortions. It’s not just about the money in the short run. It’s about changing the culture and the expectations in the longer term. And if there is a bumper crop of new babies this year, as long as their parents are legal, it will reduce the “room” available for illegals. Because they can do the work American youth can do until they learn some skills to do what they like.
22 posted on
07/18/2017 8:35:57 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. --Donald J. Trump)
To: grundle
Texas Republicans have stripped Planned Parenthood of funding and steadily obstructed patient access to care over the past few years. Bullstalin, it was Democrats who threw a sh!tfit when Republicans passed a measure to see to it that women had access to emergency care at a hospital when an UNSAFE but legal Planned Parenthood clinic botches yet another abortion. Horror of horrors, such protections for the women put too many women's clinics in supposed peril.
23 posted on
07/18/2017 8:38:17 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Bill Clinton and Al Gore took illegal campaign contributions from the Chi-Coms and 'nobody' cared...)
To: grundle
If tax money is draining away from funding abortions anywhere, it’s at least a start.
26 posted on
07/18/2017 9:04:06 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: grundle
With an average taxpayer cost of $27,000 per birth, the price tag of the cuts total an estimated $80 million, ...
*********************************
Total BS!
29 posted on
07/18/2017 10:40:30 PM PDT by
octex
To: grundle
31 posted on
07/18/2017 11:29:00 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can't impeach the President of the United States because he makes you "sad".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson