Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump will ask Supreme Court to block judge's order on travel ban
The Hill ^ | July 14, 2017 | Jordan Fabian

Posted on 07/14/2017 11:51:30 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: jazusamo

President Trump is THE top cop of the United States. It is HIS responsibility to enforce the law.

If these pissant petty tyrant judges have a problem with that there is one thing that they need to remember: they ALL have to answer to the President. They only APPLY The law. They DO NOT make law, nor do they have the ability to ENFORCE the law, nor does the federal government have any obligation to protect them when tbey piss off their constituents.


21 posted on 07/14/2017 12:09:53 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Slap him down and then Congress removes him.


22 posted on 07/14/2017 12:11:09 PM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

These are the literal cases that show why Trump needs to whack activist judges.


23 posted on 07/14/2017 12:12:30 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Which blackrobe on SCOTUS are you talking about? Except for Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, they should all get canned.

Constitutionally, however, you’d have to find “bad behavior.”

I wonder if “bad behavior” could have been meant to include essentially ignoring the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended when making a decision and writing an opinion.


24 posted on 07/14/2017 12:18:46 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He is doing the right thing. The aim of the left is to get him to break the law By ignoring a federal judge. Trump is right to not do that and to do it by the book and win that way.

And you may believe that the people of this country and not paying attention to this but you would be wrong just as you would have been wrong in thinking that Trump message to drain the swamp and his calling out of the media for what they really are wasn’t effective during the election.


25 posted on 07/14/2017 12:22:01 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Slap ‘em slap ‘em hard


26 posted on 07/14/2017 12:25:28 PM PDT by t4texas (Remember the Alamo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

If ever there was a lousy judge that should be impeached, it is this guy. The Senate wouldn’t remove him from office, but the House should be able to impeach him. It’s time to make an example, and show that these judges aren’t immune from repercussions for their unconstitutional decisions.


27 posted on 07/14/2017 12:25:40 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

Impeach the Hawaiian rascal.


28 posted on 07/14/2017 12:27:16 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I wouldn’t go back to the SCOTUS on this. There are two better options. One would be to ignore the Hawaii Judge and let him try an enforce his order. The second would be to string out all relations claims by making them provide proof of relationship until the clock has run out.


29 posted on 07/14/2017 12:32:41 PM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
SCOTUS has the _only_ jurisdiction of cases involving a state suing the Federal government.

Since SCOTUS has original jurisdiction, it has sole ability to hear these cases. No court nor precedence law has authority to change what USConstitution says.

Lawyers and government officials, lost in la-la traditions of men: follow the law, or perish.

30 posted on 07/14/2017 12:47:54 PM PDT by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The mental illness known as liberalism is a tool of satan. Judges like this lunatic won’t be satisfied until we’re all in slavery to islam.

No thanks, I’ll fight that until death.


31 posted on 07/14/2017 1:02:19 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; All

Speaking of collusion, was there collusion between this judge and when zerobama visited Hawaii in order to stop the current President from doing his Constitutional duty?

We all know why the enemedia won’t touch on this collusion but it’s also the press, who has abused their power, which has given traitorous judges like this one, an un-Constitutional platform.

We the People of these United States need to impeach the traitorous enemedia as well, even at the local levels.

CGato


32 posted on 07/14/2017 1:04:06 PM PDT by Conservative Gato (There are NOW 4 kind of LIES; Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and the Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Damn! Trump is a fighter! I love it.

Yeah, but this passel of rino's he's left to deal with don't have his back and will throw him to the wolves first chance they get.

33 posted on 07/14/2017 1:06:24 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JME_FAN

Send every single refugee to this judges home city. Things would turn around very quickly. This judge can then enjoy the suck he’s created.


34 posted on 07/14/2017 1:09:23 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Gato

“Speaking of collusion, was there collusion between this judge and when zerobama visited Hawaii in order to stop the current President from doing his Constitutional duty?”

Little doubt in my mind there was.

When 0bama nominated this sorry excuse for a judge I’d bet Watson knew he’d been bought and paid for.


35 posted on 07/14/2017 1:26:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“Watson was one of the federal judges who issued a nationwide injunction blocking the initial ban, as well as a revised version.”

To review: “The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour . . .”

Judge Watson has begun behaving badly. It is time to open the gate and walk him on out.

36 posted on 07/14/2017 1:31:44 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

Bump!


37 posted on 07/14/2017 1:33:43 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

For anybody following details, the administration is taking this to both SCOTUS and the 9th circuit, more or less simultaneously. In SCOTUS, there is still a question of whether the appeal will be directed to Kennedy alone, or to the entire court. I would involve the entire court, on the basis that it was the entire court that sunbstituted its injunction, for the one imposed by the District of Hawaii.


38 posted on 07/14/2017 1:36:03 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thank you for your post, I agree.


39 posted on 07/14/2017 1:40:24 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

“...actually earns him praise from some of the left for being willing to follow procedure and just take it up to the Supreme Court each time”

Yeah, but this judge isn’t following proper procedure. The Supreme court already reversed the exact same ruling once. Trump shouldn’t have to appeal a second time.

The Supreme Court should issue a statement that the previous reversal still applies and warn this a-hole judge that contradicting a Supreme Court ruling is grounds for holding him in contempt of court.


40 posted on 07/14/2017 1:41:11 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson