Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon says North Korea ICBM is new, not-seen-before missile
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 7/5/17 | Jamie McIntyre

Posted on 07/05/2017 3:44:23 PM PDT by ColdOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Mike-o-Matic

Equating the Cold War to WW3....


41 posted on 07/06/2017 4:28:45 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
You're the only one I know questioning it. I spent the entire day on this yesterday. It was an ICBM. They have nuclear capability. They also most likely have the nerve gas they used to kill Chia Head's brother.

I watched the UN security council meeting yesterday. It's an ICBM. I don't need to re-read anything you posted here, thanks.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-idUSKBN19P02W

https://www.wired.com/story/north-korea-icbm-missile-test/

From the above link and widely reported everywhere - "The North Koreans fired the missile at an exceedingly steep trajectory, but experts said its altitude, distance, and flight time leads them to believe the Hwasong-14 could have a range of 4,039 miles or more. That places much of Alaska at risk, along with US allies like Japan and targets as far away as Moscow."

42 posted on 07/06/2017 4:29:10 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

“I would hope our intelligence services are better than that.”

Guess what hey are not.


43 posted on 07/06/2017 4:34:05 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike-o-Matic

We’re still fighting WWIII. It formally began in September of 2001. I’d say we have the upper-hand, but the final decision is still in doubt. A number of countries in Western Europe have all but surrendered to the bad guys, for example.


44 posted on 07/06/2017 8:11:10 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

“You’re the only one I know questioning it.”

Anymore I question anything that comes with a consensus or with an expectation of immediate acceptance.

And anytime the UN is in agreement with the US I naturally get suspicious.


45 posted on 07/06/2017 8:49:20 AM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Someone is helping them.


46 posted on 07/06/2017 10:48:45 AM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! “Laughing my #Ossoff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
It goes all the way back the William Jefferson Blythe Clinton and his changing the authorization to sell missile and rocket technology to China, by making it come under the "Commerce Department" instead of the "Department of Defense".
Also read:
47 posted on 07/06/2017 11:05:58 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

> Someone is helping them.

Definitely.


48 posted on 07/06/2017 4:38:42 PM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Thanks for that info.


49 posted on 07/06/2017 10:00:59 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Examiner article is propaganda. Fiction.

Why?

It states it was launched from a “mobile launcher” yet this was a liquid-fueled rocket.

Why the hyperbole? Why no analysis of Iranian missile technology? Why don’t the North Koreans have it? If they have it, why don’t they demonstrate it? Why are the media telegraphing inflammatory news about NK reaching Soviet 1950s-era rocket technology?


50 posted on 07/09/2017 6:06:10 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson