Posted on 07/05/2017 3:44:23 PM PDT by ColdOne
Equating the Cold War to WW3....
I watched the UN security council meeting yesterday. It's an ICBM. I don't need to re-read anything you posted here, thanks.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-idUSKBN19P02W
https://www.wired.com/story/north-korea-icbm-missile-test/
From the above link and widely reported everywhere - "The North Koreans fired the missile at an exceedingly steep trajectory, but experts said its altitude, distance, and flight time leads them to believe the Hwasong-14 could have a range of 4,039 miles or more. That places much of Alaska at risk, along with US allies like Japan and targets as far away as Moscow."
“I would hope our intelligence services are better than that.”
Guess what hey are not.
We’re still fighting WWIII. It formally began in September of 2001. I’d say we have the upper-hand, but the final decision is still in doubt. A number of countries in Western Europe have all but surrendered to the bad guys, for example.
“You’re the only one I know questioning it.”
Anymore I question anything that comes with a consensus or with an expectation of immediate acceptance.
And anytime the UN is in agreement with the US I naturally get suspicious.
Someone is helping them.
> Someone is helping them.
Definitely.
Thanks for that info.
The Examiner article is propaganda. Fiction.
Why?
It states it was launched from a “mobile launcher” yet this was a liquid-fueled rocket.
Why the hyperbole? Why no analysis of Iranian missile technology? Why don’t the North Koreans have it? If they have it, why don’t they demonstrate it? Why are the media telegraphing inflammatory news about NK reaching Soviet 1950s-era rocket technology?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.