Posted on 06/19/2017 10:20:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
First there would be in the Army what is called an Article 32 investigation, a very senior officer and likely former ship captain appointed to investigate. That report would likely go to the PAC COM Commander for his action, appointing a courts martial or whatever his options are. You are right, more than one person is going to be deeply involved here.
There will be multiple investigations by USN, USCG, Japanese CG etc, so it will all be honest and in the open.
Looks very bad for the OOD on the bridge of the Fitz.
Looks like Crystal, from post 165, was trying to come right to avoid hitting the idiots on the DDG. Crystal couldn’t have been steaming a straighter course. Looks like it took 50 minutes for Crystal to do her own damage report and figure out what is what, then arrived back at the DDG.
How embarrassing for the DDG - the merch came back to the USN ship. “You guys ok? Drive boats much?”
Has the Navy changed their report of the timeline?
They cannot avoid a torpedo at all, ever. the new torpedo’s go deep then come up and strike the keel of the ship breaking it in half, sinks in minutes.
Perhaps they were trying to save the ship from you know SINKING
Not all would be asleep, some would be on watch..
I think it was a Muslim driving the other ship....
It's more likely the Fitzgerald bridge crew staged the collision that way in an attempt to murder the CO
Really! throwing him overboard was far too complex so they staged this collision to almost kill him?
That would have been EVEN more likely. (We are with very low probabilites here)
Same reasoning: a tow truck “should not be able” to collide with a state trooper’s high performance patrol car.
But if the tow truck driver crosses the double yellow line at the last second....collision.
Even though “the state trooper’s patrol car could EASILY avoid and intentional ramming by a tow truck on the highway. Easily.”
I'll preface by saying I know nothing about Navy protocol, but I would have thought that there would be a standing rule that no other non US Navy vessel be allowed to come within say 500 yards of a ship. PERIOD. If a ship get any closer defensive measures are immediately carried out. This could include changing course and going full speed.
Very possible it was intentional on the cargo ships part, but no way on earth they should have been able to execute. Someone fouled up. Big time.
Please see 165.
There are three sides to a coin, and you have addressed one of the possiblities in this event.
Any inoperability, of course, would have been the result of either hostile or non-hostile action. Given the redundancy of the DDG's assets and its superb ability to maneuver if only "by hand", one could conclude it was other than non-hostile action.
Perhaps the Board of Inquiry could request that James Kallstrom offer some insights.
Yeah, a massive build up of static electricity was released resulting in engine failure.
The actual collision was apparently at position 1, while the ship was on autopilot. The immediate maneuvers after that are the autopilot reacting to the collision and then getting back on it’s assigned course. The u-turn is when the crew went back to see what they had hit.
The Fitz apparently never detected the container ship at all until the collision, which is mind-boggling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.