Posted on 06/07/2017 5:20:56 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
In Britain, as in the U.S., when an Islamic terrorist is said to be, “known to law enforcement,” the translation is: “He is being actively ignored by law enforcement.” After the latest terrorist attack in Britain — at least as of this writing — Prime Minister Theresa May bravely announced, “Enough is enough!”
What is the point of these macho proclamations after every terrorist attack? Nothing will be done to stop the next attack. Political correctness prohibits us from doing anything that might stop it.
Poland doesn’t admit Muslims: It has no terrorism. Japan doesn’t admit Muslims: It has no terrorism. The United Kingdom and the United States used to have very few Muslims: They used to have almost no terrorism. (One notable exception was chosen as the National Freedom Hero in this year’s Puerto Rican parade in New York!) Notwithstanding the lovely Muslim shopkeeper who wouldn’t hurt a fly, everyone knows that with every tranche of peace-loving Muslims we bring in, we’re also getting some number of stone-cold killers.
Former Prime Minister Tony Blair dumped millions of Third World Muslims on Britain to force “multiculturalism” on the country. Now Britons are living with the result. Since the 9/11 attack, every U.S. president has done the same. President Bush admitted Muslim immigrants at a faster pace after 9/11 than we had been doing before 9/11.
Whatever the 9/11 attackers intended to accomplish, I bet they didn’t expect that.
Now we can’t get rid of them. Under the rules of political correctness, Western countries are prohibited from even pausing our breakneck importation of Muslims, much less sending the recent arrivals home.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Unable to summon the backbone to defeat the current enemy, the West is stuck constantly reliving that glorious time when they whipped the Nazis. In almost every Western country — except the one with an increasingly beleaguered First Amendment — it’s against the law to deny the Holocaust.
Are we really worried about a resurgence of Nazism? Isn’t Islamic terrorism a little higher on our “immediate problems” list? How about making it illegal to make statements in support of ISIS, al-Qaida, female genital mutilation, Sharia law or any act of terrorism?
The country with a First Amendment can’t do that — the most that amendment allows us to do is ban conservative speakers from every college campus in the nation.
But if our elected representatives really cared about stopping the next terrorist attack, instead of merely “watching” those on the “watch” list, they’d deport them.
To this day, we have a whole office at the Department of Justice dedicated to finding and deporting Nazis even without proof they personally committed crimes against Jews. But we can’t manage to deport hearty young Muslims who post love notes to ISIS on their Facebook pages. If the Clinton administration had merely enforced laws on the books against an Afghani immigrant, Mir Seddique Mateen, and excluded him based on his arm-length list of terrorist affiliations, his son Omar wouldn’t have been around to slaughter 49 people at an Orlando nightclub last year.
If Secretary of State John Kerry, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson or anyone else in our vaunted immigration vetting system had done his job, Pakistani Tashfeen Malik never would have been admitted to this country to commit mass murder in San Bernardino a year after she arrived. Before being warmly welcomed by the U.S., Malik’s social media posts were bristling with hatred of America and enthusiasm for jihad.
We’re already paying a battery of FBI agents to follow every Muslim refugee around the country. When they find out that one of them lists his hobby as “jihad,” we need them to stop watching and start deporting.
Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, the rest of the useless GOP — and obviously every Democrat — have the blood of the next terrorist attack on their hands if they don’t make crystal clear that admiring remarks about Islamic terrorism is a deportable act.
But they won’t do it. That’s “not who we are,” as Ryan famously said.
True, most Muslims are peaceful. Guess what? Most Nazis were peaceful! We didn’t knock ourselves out to admit as many of them as we could, screening out only the Nazis convicted of mass murder.
Before we were even formally involved in World War II, the FBI was all over the German American Bund. No one worried about upsetting our German neighbors. (Perhaps because they knew these were Germans and wouldn’t start bombing things and shooting people.)
But today, our official position is: Let’s choose love so as not to scare our Muslim neighbors. Isn’t that precisely what we want to do? Facing an immobile government, two British men — by which I mean British men — were sentenced to PRISON for putting bacon on a mosque in Bristol last year. One died in prison just after Christmas, an ancient religious holiday recently replaced by Ramadan.
If we can’t look askance at Muslims without committing a hate crime, can’t we at least stop admitting ever more “refugees,” some percentage of whom are going to be terrorists and 100 percent of whom will consume massive amounts of government resources?
No, that’s “not who we are.”
Until any Western leader is willing to reduce the number of Muslims in our midst, could they spare us the big talk? “We surrender” would at least have the virtue of honesty
Americans have not the strength necessary to stop the attacks-MASS DEPORTATIONS!
Tell it Ann. The time is now - increase deportations and a temp ban on all immigration until we revamp what is currently being done. Revisit 1965 and change the horrendous bill and insidious way of selecting who can come here.
yep, it is a perfect time to carve out a country called land of bs religion from a fake god, let’s say fislam..tell all muslims in the country, you can leave and live in fislam (fake islam) on your own ,,with a few catches, no outside travel or communication..you must see what hellholes mohamm creates
or risk the armed citizens finding you..
islam is a hate group
The country is willingly terminating itself by jailing innocents who complain about the m*slim invasion.
What I hate being said by liberal apologists for muslim terrorists, is when they say "Islam is peace" or "Islam means peace".
No, it doesn't! Islam means submit, or we kill you. It most accurately means "Submission". And if you don't, they may tolerate you as long as you abide by their rules which make you a second-class subject. We need leaders here in the USA who will force islamists to abide by our rules, submit to our laws, or get the hell out. I vote for them being tossed out.
“Why is it that Japan,a large,prosperous industrial nation,has never,*ever* had a jihadi attack while Britain,France,Germany,Spain,the US,Canada and Australia have had *dozens* of attacks resulting in *thousands* of fatalities? “
—
Wow! I’ll have to spend the rest of the evening pondering that one. Tough to figure out./s
.
Tie all immigration to unemployment, welfare, food stamps. If it’s to high no immigrants. Keep us employed
Ann is right. Plus we need repatriation for all the illegal Obama imports in recent history.
Humans are born with truth in their heart. Ann reveals it.
...If the Clinton administration had merely enforced laws on the books against an Afghani immigrant, Mir Seddique Mateen, and excluded him based on his arm-length list of terrorist affiliations, his son Omar wouldn’t have been around to slaughter 49 people at an Orlando nightclub last year...
If Secretary of State John Kerry, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson or anyone else in our vaunted immigration vetting system had done his job, Pakistani Tashfeen Malik never would have been admitted to this country to commit mass murder in San Bernardino a year after she arrived. Before being warmly welcomed by the U.S., Malik’s social media posts were bristling with hatred of America and enthusiasm for jihad.
Excellent points. Good piece...
Very well written article by Ann. Everybody should read it, ESPECIALLY British Prime Minister May.
Spot on commentary but it will fall upon deaf ears. Or more accurately, the people who are already inclined to agree with this will agree, and the rest will condemn it as islamophobic and racist.
So what happens? In the medium term, by that I mean in 10 to 20 years, islam wins the west. Hard stop. A religion/political philosophy that lives by a strategy of increasing it’s size and does so through high birth rates and enforcing its code through a campaign of fear and violence will triumph against those religions and political philosophies that abhor such things.
Since Nazism is a scourge, how is that the liberals and leftists cannot make the connection that a significant portion of the Islamic world considered itself to be allied with Hitler? Clearly, the anti-Semitic polices of both the Nazis and much of the Islamic leadership were and are virtually identical.
Well, this can’t be.
The liberals posting over at NRO are claiming only 6 Americans have been killed by Muslim terrorists since 9/11.
The SPLC is mighty proud of their work turning everyday liberal idiots into complete lunatics
It’s way past time to ban islam in America. Like Nazism, islam is just as or more evil. Ban islam and ban islam now.
Otherwise, just Meow like the inert retards you are.
Bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.