Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Volunteers on lookout for speeding cars in Menomonie, Wis.
Fox 9 News ^ | Apr 03 2017 10:58AM CDT | Allie Johnson

Posted on 04/04/2017 1:11:53 PM PDT by Sopater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Bob434

and the ‘evidence’ they are using is not factual evidence backed up by credible eye witnesses- it is presented by citizens who may or may not have grudges against their intended victims- so their ‘evidence’ is bogus- but apparently the police don’t care- they use it to harass drivers- It doesn’t matter how’ certified’ the guns are- no amount of certifications can prevent ordinary citizens from exacting revenge by falsely accusing people of breaking the law- Again it is idiotic giving citizens this kind of power to harass, via the police, people they don’t like-


61 posted on 04/04/2017 11:19:49 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

The “point” is that you either didn’t read the article OR deliberately made misleading statements.


62 posted on 04/05/2017 7:11:47 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

The “point” is that you either didn’t read the article OR deliberately made misleading statements.


63 posted on 04/05/2017 7:12:03 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

no sir- thep oint is exactly what I’m saying- prove to me that the police won’t abuse/harrass citizens ? You can’t- that is the point- They will claim they have ‘evidence’ that isn’t acceptable evidence- for the reasons stated- You have done zero to counter the issue that people with grudges CAN and WILL abuse their power and make false claims- Showing the police a radar reading is NOT proof someone was speeding- that reading could very well be made up and the cop has absolutely no way to verify- The ‘evidence’ would never be allowed in court and should NEVER be allowed to use to harass citizens with either! What don’t you understand about that? I never once mentioned that court would be involved- I made the statement that the info would never be permissible in court and therefore should not be permissible for the police to use to harass citizens- Address that fact!


64 posted on 04/05/2017 10:32:42 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

“no sir- thep oint is exactly what I’m saying- prove to me that the police won’t abuse/harrass citizens ? “

You can repeatedly ignore that I pointed out that you had not read the article and thus made untrue statements.

Thank you.


65 posted on 04/05/2017 10:53:41 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

and you can repeatedly ignore the fact that allowing citizens the ability to use radar detectors is idiotic, and that it has massive potential for abuse by citizens with grudges or just plain mean dispositions all you like-

The issue is no longer about guesstimates-

the original issue was about citizens abusing their new found power by claiming anything they like- which they WILL do, and which you have not once addressed- Their radar readouts are NOT evidence- Regardless of how many times they get their radar guns ‘calibrated and certified’- there is NO way to Verify if they are telling the truth ot not- As pointed out repeatedly to you-

Address that fact-


66 posted on 04/05/2017 11:11:50 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

“The issue is no longer about guesstimates-”

hmmm. time to moveon.org ...


67 posted on 04/05/2017 11:16:22 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Had an interesting drive home on Sunday. On a congested interstate between Colorado Springs and Denver, I see this dark blue Maximum drifting left, then right. After a few minutes and several close calls it was clear: that drive was out of it. I tried to stay away but at one point we (the wife and 2 of my kids) were right next to her and when she looked at us, we all came to the same immediate conclusion: drunk off her 20-something a$$.

We, along with a couple other fellow drivers called the state patrol providing her license and description. She was on that road for 30 minutes and I saw her 3 times nearly get rear ended by a truck pulling a horse trailer because she kept stopping. Countless other close calls where the other drivers had to avoid her.

You can call me all kinds of names for that too, but I will continue to make that call. Every single time.


68 posted on 04/17/2017 1:49:46 PM PDT by mad puppy (E PLURIBUS UNUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Not at all the same thing. I’d have done as you did. You didn’t have to borrow a bunch of equipment from the police department and then provide a list of alleged offenders to the department for them to then go and send out warning letters...


69 posted on 04/18/2017 3:03:31 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson