Posted on 03/29/2017 6:24:04 AM PDT by Kaslin
What will President Trump do after the Obamacare debacle? For 48 hours, some Hill Republicans -- and Trump himself -- spoke as if the president and the GOP could smoothly, seamlessly and swiftly pivot to tax reform. Then, Monday night, came an Axios report that Trump might choose to pursue an infrastructure bill -- the only measure with even a hope of some Democratic support -- at the same time as tax reform.
Whatever the final decision, Trump and Hill Republicans are in danger of failing again if they do not direct their every action toward the creation of jobs and an increase in wages. That's why Trump won the presidency, and it is what voters expect of him.
"Trump and Republicans have two big numbers that are the measurements of success," says a GOP pollster and strategist involved with the efforts on Capitol Hill. "One is how many jobs are created. Two is how much wages go up. He has to have both of them."
Democrats often point to the number of jobs created in the eight years after Barack Obama took office amid an economic meltdown. Unemployment, which hit 10 percent in October 2009, is now 4.7 percent. But median household income is less than it was 10 years ago. People who are working don't feel they have much chance of a raise or of finding a better-paying job. That is why it is important for Trump not only to help create jobs but also raise wages.
In its most recent poll -- the one that found Trump's job approval rating at 37 percent -- Quinnipiac asked 1,056 registered voters this question: "Do you think the nation's economy is getting better, getting worse, or staying about the same?"
Forty percent said the economy is improving -- not a terrible number, especially when just 16 percent said the economy is getting worse. Perhaps the more alarming figure is that 39 percent said they believe the economy is staying about the same.
"Since (the economy) is bad now, saying things are the same is pessimistic," notes the GOP pollster. In other words, when voters say the economy is the same, they often mean it's still bad.
Men tend to say the economy is doing a little better -- 50 percent told Quinnipiac it is improving. But just 32 percent of women said the economy is getting better, while 20 percent said it is getting worse and 44 percent said it is the same. If one takes those "same" answers as "it's still bad," that's 64 percent who are dissatisfied with the way things are going.
That is why Trump won last November. Yes, other issues -- immigration, terrorism, Clinton fatigue -- played a role, but the most basic reason Trump is president is because a lot of voters believed a change was needed to improve the economy.
To give perhaps an extreme example: This week the South Bend (Indiana) Tribune reported that a local restaurant owner, an illegal immigrant from Mexico who has been in the United States for nearly 20 years and has no criminal record, might be deported. His wife, a naturalized U.S. citizen, voted for Trump and is now stunned at what has happened, having believed only "bad hombres" would be deported under the Trump administration. When the Tribune asked why she supported Trump, she answered, "I did it for the economy. We needed a change."
The new president took some early actions to address those concerns -- the Carrier deal, executive orders killing the Trans-Pacific Partnership and cutting federal regulations on business. But the first big legislative item Trump pursued was to repeal and replace Obamacare.
One problem mostly unremarked at the time was that Trump didn't even try to sell Obamacare replacement as a measure to increase jobs and wages. In his March 20 speech in Louisville, for example, Trump not only did not frame Obamacare as a jobs and wages issue, he didn't even try very hard to portray it as a cost-of-living issue, offering only a few sentences on rising premiums and not once uttering the word "deductible." Obamacare repeal and replacement, as Trump presented it, was just something that had to be done before moving on to the fun stuff, which was tax reform.
Now Trump is in fact moving on, to tax reform, or maybe to tax reform and infrastructure. Both are more obviously jobs and wages issues than Obamacare. If he wants to succeed, that's how Trump must shape and sell the legislation -- and his entire presidency.
Tax reform
Nobody can guess what he will do. I think getting the congress critters and their spouses together last night was a stroke of genius
They have to go back and do health care reform — and do it for real this time. All the news about companies like Carrier and Ford investing in plants in this country is going to go out the window if these companies are going to face 20% increases in health insurance premiums like the AHCA projected.
Yes..and then tax reform.
Tax reform
AKA: “Tax cuts for the rich”. Stupid Party never learns.
In the 20 years that illegal immigrant was running that restaurant he could have signed up in Mexico, gone through the waiting list, and become a citizen.
At a minimum, he could have gotten work authorization.
What a pleasure it is to have a real woman; a woman with class and grace represent this great country!
Trump needs to say “enough” to outsourcing, and start to bring back American jobs, right here.
That is the biggest thing he could initiate right now.
It is important. China is rapidly passing our country, in economic might, yet we continue to allow them to flood our entire retail sector with goods of all kinds.
Without importing things from America.
This has gone on now for one entire generation. Both parties have been complicit in this monumental sell-out of America.
Trump is the first guy, who will actually, possibly stand up and say “enough”.
I hope he will.
That is why I have supported him, for quite a while now.
That, and the southern border wall.
:D
You can’t force employers to take on huge health insurance premiums for their employees — and then expect them to keep all those jobs here.
Have you been sleeping?
That is a direct result from Obamacare's threshold of 50 full-time workers on small businesses.
Because of this, businesses reduced workers hours to below 30 hours per week to get under the limit, and those workers were forced to take second (or third) jobs to make up for the lost wages from reduced work hours.
People are perceived to be working more for less net income, because they are now carrying multiple jobs and the costs associated with traveling between them, as well as the lost family time from working multiple jobs.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.