With Gorsuch being now subject to the Democrat Inquisition, I am surprised that Title searches did not find this already posted here. The omission is unfortunate because we Conservatives, of all people, ought to be best informed about those we propose to support. For any who know litte or nothing about Neil Gorsuch, this profile piece will help greatly as you study to fill in the blanks.
1 posted on
03/21/2017 9:40:27 AM PDT by
HKMk23
To: HKMk23
Thank you for posting this.
To: HKMk23
I love how he schooled DiFi and Leaky Leahy. Hee hee.
3 posted on
03/21/2017 9:52:30 AM PDT by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: HKMk23
“Hostile environment for women” is such a snowflake phrase.If the University knew that one,or more,of the players had a history of violence (just to use one example) I could see it being held partially responsible.But the fact that the Compost has positive things to say about him...particularly things like that...make me wonder if this guy could prove to be another Souter.
To: HKMk23
Summary: Gorsuch is a good guy because he ruled for the plaintiff. More results-based analysis from the Washington Compost. But the good news is that if the Compost is talking up Gorsuch as such a great guy, the Dems have lost this battle.
5 posted on
03/21/2017 10:03:06 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: HKMk23
Note: not many conservative responses on WP. Lets support Gorsuch. Here is mine.
There is an interesting and apropos term of art in litigation. It is called ‘opening the door” When Harry Reid changed the rules on the filibuster, he forever changed a tradition, not a law. He was warned that the nuclear option could come back to bite the Dems, but went ahead because he couldn’t imagine another Republican President in tandem with a Republican Senate.
Those were the days when Dems and liberal MSM discussions were all about the transformation of America under Obama and the continuation of the liberal regimes under the guidance of the inevitable President Clinton.
There may be Senators on the left who will vote to keep the new “nuclear option tradition” to defeat Republican appointees to the Court, but I suspect the Republicans will simply do away with the filibuster altogether if that happens. After all, Democrats have called for the elimination of the filibuster for years because it happened to be used mostly by Republicans who were trying to stop the transformation of America
6 posted on
03/21/2017 10:05:09 AM PDT by
wildbill
(If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
To: HKMk23
But Gorsuch himself is perhaps not so predictable."Not so predictable" if you want to "predict" that he will act as a hard partisan, like he's "supposed to". The Compost is irreedemable.
10 posted on
03/21/2017 10:10:10 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: HKMk23
The dems who oppose him are vicious partisans. He is an excellent choice.
When do the dems find someone willing to take a little money for saying that Gorsuch said the n word in 1998? Or that he talked coke bottles with women?
11 posted on
03/21/2017 10:11:31 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(The media is acting full-on as the Democratic Party's press agency now: Robert Spencer)
To: HKMk23
As the new head of EPA, Anne Gorsuch wasted no time acting on her ideas for slashing big government and reducing regulations. To the howls of environmental groups and Democrats, she cut the agencys budget by 22 percent, dramatically decreased cases and actions against polluters, relaxed Clean Air Act regulations and started hiring staff from the industries the EPA was supposed to regulate.Remember how the 1980s was the last time we had clean air and clean water? And now the entire country is an environmental disaster because of those cuts to budget and regulations and enforcement? Me neither. Trump and Pruitt, take note!
16 posted on
03/21/2017 10:23:36 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: HKMk23
The argument of originalists like Gorsuch is always Well, Im just following the law. But its intellectually dishonest to pretend you can somehow divine the original founders intent, said Ayesha Khan, a former longtime legal director for Americans United for Separation of Church and State Yes, all you have to go on is The Federalist Papers, extensive histories of personal letters amongst them, speeches, and nearly three centuries of books written about them and the early days of the country.
18 posted on
03/21/2017 10:38:03 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: HKMk23
Gorsuch is flummoxing Sen A. Filobuster Bagogas, aka Pat Leahy
19 posted on
03/21/2017 10:43:19 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
To: HKMk23
It worries me to see The Post supporting Gorsuch, to any degree and for any reason.
20 posted on
03/21/2017 10:45:28 AM PDT by
Interesting Times
(WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
To: HKMk23
Has Cruz testified yet today?
22 posted on
03/21/2017 10:51:22 AM PDT by
MayflowerMadam
(“Great spirits have always encountered opposition from mediocre minds." A. Einstein)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson