Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Are No Tariffs on Coffee. Care to Guess Why?
FEE ^ | March 10, 2017 | Donald J. Boudreaux

Posted on 03/10/2017 8:57:25 PM PST by TBP

Being a world-class economist, my colleague Walter Williams spends much of his time asking probing questions. Here’s one that he posed to me recently by e-mail:

Don:

I don’t think there are tariffs on coffee and I know of no organization calling for coffee tariffs. I wonder why.

Great, probing question.

The answer is that there are very few coffee growers in the United States. In the U.S. states, coffee is grown commercially only in Hawaii. Coffee is also grown commercially also in Puerto Rico. The result of this small number of American coffee growers is that these growers are too small in number to form a powerful-enough interest group. But, of course, coffee is consumed massively throughout the U.S. (I’m drinking some right now, by the way. It’s from Guatemala. Yum!) The pain to consumers caused by restrictions on coffee imports would be too great relative to the gains to American coffee growers; politically it would be a bad move for most members of Congress to support protective tariffs on coffee.

Yet if Congress and U.S. presidential administrations really were, as their members often pretende, intent on apolitically using U.S. trade policy to “level the playing field” or to otherwise correct for distortions in global markets induced by other governments’ destructive policies, we likely should see U.S. tariffs on coffee imports.

I haven’t researched the matter, but I’d be shocked to discover that the governments of coffee-growing countries such as Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ethiopia, Brazil, and Jamaica engage in none of the policies that are typically alleged to create “uneven playing fields” in global markets. If Uncle Sam really were so self-sacrificingly and apolitically intent on using tariffs and other trade restrictions to improve global markets, why does Uncle Sam not use such tariffs and restrictions in the coffee market?

The bottom line, of course, is that every trade restriction is simultaneously justified publicly as a righteous intervention against some foreign evil-doing while, in fact, it is a monopoly-power privilege granted by an unethical government to a greedy and powerful domestic interest group.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; coffee; tariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
Walter E. Williams raises a good question.
1 posted on 03/10/2017 8:57:25 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

Coffee growing states made donations to the xlintonista foundation?


2 posted on 03/10/2017 9:01:31 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I’m a hard-core gardener for a lotta years and you cannot buy viable coffee seeds. Kinda like tobacco. Maybe Colombia shipped the drugs in coffee tares starting in the 50s and it just kinda ‘stayed that way’.


3 posted on 03/10/2017 9:01:57 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Did we lose our phenomenal coffee agriculture to South America?


4 posted on 03/10/2017 9:02:01 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Why no tariff on chocolate?............


5 posted on 03/10/2017 9:02:39 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

They tried to grow coffee here in the late 1800s. Didn’t work........


6 posted on 03/10/2017 9:04:03 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

As an attorney would say, “asked and answered.”

CC


7 posted on 03/10/2017 9:06:46 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I’m no economist, but isn’t a tariff typically placed on a competing item produced by a foreign country? Cars, for example. If we don’t grow coffee, why would we put an import tariff on it? They aren’t undercutting American coffee growers. And I like coffee.


8 posted on 03/10/2017 9:08:34 PM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In other words, not a “great, probing question” that speaks to trade imbalances.


9 posted on 03/10/2017 9:10:31 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

We do — in Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Kona coffee comes form Hawaii.


10 posted on 03/10/2017 9:12:29 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Viable tobacco seeds are available (for now) from many sources on the ‘net...

I know because I’ve “grown my own” for years, and Colorado has good weather for tobacco if the hail doesn’t get your leaf...


11 posted on 03/10/2017 9:12:53 PM PST by elteemike (Light travels faster than sound...That's why so many people appear bright until you hear them speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I don’t know. Ask Ghirardelli.


12 posted on 03/10/2017 9:13:00 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Just a false argument against Trump’s possible tariffs.

As mentioned, there is little American coffee growing industry.

Not sure I’m in favor of tariffs in most cases, but the article is disingenuous.


13 posted on 03/10/2017 9:13:36 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“Yet if Congress and U.S. presidential administrations really were, as their members often pretende, intent on apolitically using U.S. trade policy to “level the playing field” or to otherwise correct for distortions in global markets induced by other governments’ destructive policies, we likely should see U.S. tariffs on coffee imports.”

Utterly stupid. It we had large regions of the country with the climate for commercially growing coffee, then it might make sense. The free traitors just wont stop, will they?


14 posted on 03/10/2017 9:14:27 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I’m surprised moochelle didn’t think of it! ..........


15 posted on 03/10/2017 9:15:02 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

They are always looking for revenue sources. A small tariff on coffee imports would be fine by me and I drink a lot of coffee and tea as well
!....


16 posted on 03/10/2017 9:18:48 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Ok, I forgot about Hawaii. Kona is quite pricey if I recall. I don’t know if there is enough Kona to even be competitive in the normal coffee market. I can’t say I’ve ever had Puerto Rican coffee, but I’ll give it a try.


17 posted on 03/10/2017 9:20:25 PM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBP

If push comes to shove we can grow better coffee than anyone with greenhouses, robots, and injections of cannabis. LOL.


18 posted on 03/10/2017 9:21:30 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (Lock. Them. Up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The bottom line, of course, is that every trade restriction is simultaneously justified publicly as a righteous intervention against some foreign evil-doing while, in fact, it is a monopoly-power privilege granted by an unethical government to a greedy and powerful domestic interest group.

There may be some truth in that statement, but it is only one half of the truth and the author is attempting to deceive us via a lie of omission.

The fact of the matter is that every time we impose socialized costs on our manufacturers (workplace safety, pollution control, etc.) we either impose similar costs on foreign manufacturers when their goods cross our border - or we lose our domestic manufacturers. In this modern, ultra-efficient, low cost shipping world it is just a simple fact - a small cost benefit when it comes to production is all it takes to make or break a producer. The author knows this and is lying to us by omitting this side of the story from his statements.

Hopefully he is just using Walter E. William's name to add luster to his article since Walter is one of my few remaining heroes and I can't believe he would try to deceive us like this fellow is doing.
19 posted on 03/10/2017 9:23:06 PM PST by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
Kona is quite pricey if I recall.

So we obviously need a tariff to drive up the prices on imported coffee so Kona can compete.

Protect American coffee jobs!

20 posted on 03/10/2017 9:26:17 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson