Posted on 02/01/2017 7:26:43 AM PST by blackbetty59
The president is considering deporting immigrants who are on welfare. Did you ever in your wildest dreams imagine you would be reading such a sentence?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
All for it.
Back when I was a young man, welfare was for the disabled. Then they said addiction was a disease and the drunks and bums got a free ride down to hell and now for the foreigners who wont work as well.
Perhaps it should be set back to the disabled again?
And the good little Democrat snowflakes yelled: “Blasphemy!!! Heresy!!!”
And then, they melted.
Illegal aliens first. So-called dreamers included.
They need to become citizens and THEN get a job.
If they are enrolled in a citizenship class and learning English so they can get a job, might they be exempted?
Ditto. Better than I expected, and more like a dream. Get rid of these deadbeats sucking working Americans dry.
Thank you, God, for answering our prayers.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
You cannot work in Mexico if you’re not a citizen.
Is Trump talking about “immigrants” or just the illegal ones?
I know! In Japan, if you work in the field outside your visa specification, you’re deported and banned for a number of years.
DANG !!! ,,, now I understand ,, you just don’t pay the lawless invaders to live in your house at your expense . Brilliant !!!!
WINNING !!!!!!!!!!
Ok, what I don’t understand is how a two week old baby is out of work? Babies can’t work. Shouldn’t welfare be only for people who are of the age to work??
The Law is on Trump’s side:
INA 212(a)(4) Public Charge
A. For purposes of determining inadmissibility, “public charge” means an individual who is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance or institutionalization for long-term care at government expense.
A number of factors must be considered when making a determination that a person is likely to become a public charge.
Under Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), an individual seeking admission to the United States or seeking to adjust status to that of an individual lawfully admitted for permanent residence (green card) is inadmissible if the individual, “at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge.” Public charge does not apply in naturalization proceedings. If an individual is inadmissible, admission to the United States or adjustment of status is not granted.”
as is:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/12/08/public-law-414-june-27-1952/
“Public Law 414 – June 27, 1952 The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
i’ve posted this before- but maybe some haven’;t seen it- the fact is ‘refugees’ are treated far better than our own homeless citizens are:
States and towns all across America were given money to build homes for refugees to live in once they got here- I’m assuming they wouldn’t have to pay rent or utilities-
I have read that refugees are given ‘cash assistance via several different government programs- one being SSI and another through ‘Temporary Assistance for Needy Families’- another through ‘Refugee Cash Assistance’- after being here for 7 years they get medical assistance through medicaid, through ‘State Children’s Health Insurance Program’ or through ‘Refugee Medical Assistance’
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program feeds them for up to 9 years
America nor any other nation can support the worlds poor and of course no immigrant whether legal or illegal should be on any kind of welfare unless maybe some kind of accident or health crisis happened after they received a green card or became a citizen.
America is a poor, very poor country, otherwise we would not have an astronomical debt of $20 Trillion dollars and growing. We are beyond poor. Beyond broke.
We need to fix every single waste of money so we can reverse our debt and fix our deficit so we can repay our debt to get out from under the crippling interest rates from the debt.
I’m so thankful we have a fair but compassionate President who understands we simply cannot support the world’s poor but can help where we can. Spending more money than we have has to stop. It just has to.
Highly likely true.
Trump’s team is looking at this and will likely implement the plan at some time.
Trump is peeling a very large multilayered Federal onion. When they believe the timing is right, they’ll cut off the aliens who are here being a financial charge. The question is is when. Likely after several actions have already successfully implented.
Trump actually needs to do this in order to broadcast the message that there are “no freebies for illegals.”
Convince your Congressman to pass a law that immigrants will not only swear that they will not go on welfare, but that they will also swear that they will support any children or dependents they have and will not let them go on welfare.
A change of law is necessary for this. Such a law would need to enforce contract law in which the parents violate the contract.
The 14th Amendment, taken literally, clearly states that anchor babies are citizens. The whole purpose of the 14th defining citizenship is so it can then state that citizens have equal protection for privileges. Non-Citizens are not covered by the 14th Amendment, despite what those who can't read say.
Consider naturalized citizens. They are immigrants who are covered by the 14th Amendment. But naturalized citizens (and many visa type immigrants) enter into contracts with condition of the contract that they do not go on welfare.
So then the legal question would be whether parents can enter into a contract that abridges the protection that the 14th grants to anchor children.
Then there is the never even discussed problem of welfare recipients from Chicago also registering in Gary, Indiana and Milwaukee, Wisconsin so they can collect in all three states.
12 additional welfare checks, all less than a one hour drive away for 6 people jammed into a rented car.
I don’t know about today’s laws, but back in my time people coming in on visas had to have a non-refundable return ticket, and a sponsor guaranteeing work and that they would not be a burden on the US government.
There needs to be a case to go before the Supreme Court to establish a strong, clear ruling. I agree with you. There is no nation in the world that declares citizenship for the children of non-citizens. It is just crazy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.