Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions Emerge Why Trump Security Advisor Spoke Repeatedly With Russian Ambassador
Zero Hedge ^ | 13 Jan 2017 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 01/13/2017 1:29:53 PM PST by amorphous

Tell us if you have heard this one before.

The Washington Post reports that two people familiar with the issue, who spoke on condition of anonymity, claim that President-elect Trump's choice for national security adviser, Michael Flynn, held multiple phone conversations with Russia's ambassador to Washington on the day the US announced retaliation for Moscow's interference in the election.

The phone calls were first reported by Washington Post columnist David Ignatius.

As Reuters reports, the conversations appear to raise further questions about contacts between Trump's advisers and Russian officials at a time when U.S. intelligence agencies contend that Moscow waged a multifaceted campaign of hacking and other actions to boost Trump's election chances over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

On Dec. 29, U.S. President Barack Obama ordered the expulsion of 35 Russian suspected spies and imposed sanctions on two Russian intelligence agencies over their involvement in hacking U.S. political groups in the 2016 election.

Whether Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak discussed those sanctions is unclear.

An 18th-century U.S. law, the Logan Act, bars unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments that are in disputes with the United States.

So with these terrible, damning insights exposed, here is the Trump transition team's response...

A Trump spokesman said on Friday that Flynn took a call from the Russian ambassador last month, and discussed setting up a call between the president-elect and Russian President Vladimir Putin after Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20.

"The call centered around the logistics of setting up a call with the president of Russia and the president-elect after he was sworn in and they exchanged logistical information on how to initiate and schedule that call. That was it, plain and simple," spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters.

Spicer said the call took place on Dec. 28. He said the call followed text message exchanges initiated by Flynn on Christmas Day, in which he wished the ambassador a merry Christmas and said he looked forward to "touching base with you and working with you."

As a reminder, president-elect Trump also defended his approach to the Russian leader in the news conference, saying it would benefit U.S. interests...

"If Putin likes Donald Trump, guess what, folks? That’s called an asset, not a liability," Trump said, adding he believed Russia could help in the fight against Islamic State.

That sure sounds like commie hate-speak to us!! Or at least we assume this will be the news cycle narrative for the weekend.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: flynn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
"So with these terrible, damning insights exposed, here is the Trump transition team's response...


A Trump spokesman said on Friday that Flynn took a call from the Russian ambassador last month, and discussed setting up a call between the president-elect and Russian President Vladimir Putin after Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20.

"The call centered around the logistics of setting up a call with the president of Russia and the president-elect after he was sworn in and they exchanged logistical information on how to initiate and schedule that call. That was it, plain and simple," spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters.


meh: The DEMWITS are not going to be satisfied until we have a nuclear exchange...

1 posted on 01/13/2017 1:29:53 PM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: amorphous

What could they POSSIBLY have had to talk about?
Shouldn’t Flynn have been throwing rocks at them?


2 posted on 01/13/2017 1:31:01 PM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Uhm, we spoke to the Iranians before Reagan was inaugurated and won 1st place, with our people coming home at the same time.

That’s called winning...


3 posted on 01/13/2017 1:34:12 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

I spent a little time with an ambassador. His family was renting a lake out next door to my parents. I told him where to eat.

I hope I didn’t break a law.


4 posted on 01/13/2017 1:36:47 PM PST by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

They are so determined to fight the Russians while protecting Iran’s nuclear bombs.


5 posted on 01/13/2017 1:36:47 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

ZeroCells


6 posted on 01/13/2017 1:38:05 PM PST by DoughtyOne (John McStain. The friend of those who hate our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Only six more days, until relations between our two countries are NOT being held hostage, by the bad-willed Obama administration.

Patience, people.


7 posted on 01/13/2017 1:38:28 PM PST by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

THAT’S IT HE’S FINISHED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


8 posted on 01/13/2017 1:38:46 PM PST by Mr. K ( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Important note that everyone must remember. The Washington Post is the designated media outlet for the public position of the CIA. And CNN is the specifically funded media outlet for the positions of the U.S. State Department.


 

 

 

 

9 posted on 01/13/2017 1:39:29 PM PST by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

“Trump’s choice for national security adviser, Michael Flynn, held multiple phone conversations with Russia’s ambassador to Washington on the day the US announced retaliation for Moscow’s interference in the election.”

The current President was initiating conflict with a major world power shortly before leaving office.
Dang straight the next President’s advisors would be talking to that world power about whether that conflict will be continued.


10 posted on 01/13/2017 1:39:58 PM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

It’s Flynn that the deep state really fears. He wants to take away the CIA’s drone program and give it to the Military.


11 posted on 01/13/2017 1:41:30 PM PST by RedWulf (TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Yes, it’s very tempting - even reasonable - to initially dismiss anything written by a guy going under a pseudonym borrowed from a troublemaker in an R-rated movie, and working for a semi-blog with a bizarre name.

Except... Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge consistently makes a whole lotta sense, and a lot of people think he really is worth reading.


12 posted on 01/13/2017 1:42:47 PM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Keep beating that drum, boys. You’ll drum yourself right out of business.


13 posted on 01/13/2017 1:44:35 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

NOBODY questioned why Queen Putt was Putin’s bitch for eight years and promised to be “more flexible” for Pimp Daddy Vlad.


14 posted on 01/13/2017 1:47:56 PM PST by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
Anonymous sources = Fake News= Bullshiit.
15 posted on 01/13/2017 1:48:06 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
The Washington Post is full of crap, so who cares?
16 posted on 01/13/2017 1:48:52 PM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Why did the Cleanis meet with the US Attorney General on the tarmac?

We won. Get over it.


17 posted on 01/13/2017 1:53:20 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Lets recall that just a few weeks ago, Obama seemed to be pushing for conflict with Russia. McCain was popping his mouth of and the press was giddy with anticipation.

You’re a few weeks to a month from being sworn in, my what could you possibly want to convey to Russia?

How about, I know we have a donkey girl in there now, but our administration is going to draw this back. Please don’t let this idiot draw you into a confrontation before then.

These breathless people that assume anything Trump does has to be evil, are seriously detached from reality.


18 posted on 01/13/2017 1:59:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (John McStain. The friend of those who hate our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
18 U.S. Code § 953 - Private correspondence with foreign governments Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.) Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
19 posted on 01/13/2017 2:11:55 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

As always, the seriousness of the charge is what is important, not the evidence or substance or verity.


20 posted on 01/13/2017 2:18:04 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson