Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2017 8:33:01 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Evidently dysfunctional.


2 posted on 01/02/2017 8:34:40 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Somebody is owed a warning?

STFU. No leftist should ever have a voice in anything.


3 posted on 01/02/2017 8:35:53 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
voted on Monday to significantly curtail the power

They curtailed the workload but let them keep the money?

That's a payoff!!!

4 posted on 01/02/2017 8:38:29 PM PST by donna ('God's standards, like it or not, are the basis for the laws that led to western civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The House Republicans’ move would take away both power and independence from an investigative body, and give lawmakers more control over internal inquiries.”

Can we hope that they may be a little more ruthless than the board has been?

Is this next one for real or did you add it as satire?

“It also came on the eve of a historic shift in power in Washington, where Republicans control both houses of Congress and where a wealthy businessman with myriad potential conflicts of interest is preparing to move into the White House.”


5 posted on 01/02/2017 8:39:32 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

it should have been disbanded. it was a pelosi creation that boner continued — and it was totally out of control.


6 posted on 01/02/2017 8:41:20 PM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Since this comes from the NYT, maybe the office isn’t really independent, and the Republicans are doing a preemptive strike?


8 posted on 01/02/2017 8:42:22 PM PST by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What do you want to bet that it was only used as a weapon against conservatives?


10 posted on 01/02/2017 8:43:32 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Goodlatte’s tweet: Rules amdt approved by House GOP strengthens Office of Cong Ethics & improves upon due process rights. Does nothing to impede OCE’s work.


13 posted on 01/02/2017 8:47:23 PM PST by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

PFL


14 posted on 01/02/2017 8:48:40 PM PST by Batman11 ( ItÂ’s DJTÂ’s continuing holiday performance of The Nutcracker Tweet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The House is not in session.
This vote occured only in the Republican Conference, it is part of a Rules package that will be voted on by the whole House.

That said, anything that Pelosi pushed through in 2008 should probably be removed.


16 posted on 01/02/2017 8:49:10 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Stopped reading when I saw NYTimes.


17 posted on 01/02/2017 8:49:48 PM PST by citizen (Sanctuary cities: Illegals move in for free stuff, residents move out b/c they can't pay the taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Twitter has replaced the NYT, LOL....


19 posted on 01/02/2017 8:50:51 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Everybody has a bad memory for things that happen prior to today.
Here's how this went back in 2008

Republicans, backed by 18 Democrats, thought they had won a parliamentary vote prior to consideration of the new ethics office, a victory that would have derailed the proposal.

But Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the Democratic leadership held the vote open for 16 minutes beyond the alloted 15-minute deadline and, in that period, convinced several Democrats to switch their votes.

The final vote on the parliamentary procedure was 207-206. The Democrats who changed their votes were Reps. Sanford Bishop (Ga.), G.K Butterfield (N.C.), Emanuel Cleaver (Mo.) and Bart Stupak (Mich.), according to Democratic and GOP members and aides.

The final vote, which changed House rules in order to implement the OCE, was 229-182. Almost 30 Republicans, fearing that they would be caught on the wrong side of the issue come Election Day, threw their support behind the Democratic plan at the last moment, giving Democratic leaders a solid margin of victory on final passage.

20 posted on 01/02/2017 8:51:51 PM PST by stylin19a (Hey obamas-it's Ray Charles time - "Hit the Road Jack"...you know the rest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If the New York Times doesn’t like it our guys made the right choice.


22 posted on 01/02/2017 8:56:56 PM PST by GOPJ (ObamaCare Motto: "If You Like Your Doctor, Maybe You'll Like Your New Doctor" - Dave Barry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The “Office of Congressional Ethics” I am certain was to be used by the Democrats as their tool, or perhaps one of many tools with which to hammer the incoming Trump Administration.

Bravo Republicans for recognizing, and dismantling what can only be called a Democrat ruse.


23 posted on 01/02/2017 8:57:51 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The problem with the Office of Congressional Ethics was that the Democrats had no “ethics” so they had nothing to investigate.

now if it had been called the Office of a Lack of Congressional Ethics, and really did their job, the Republicans would double their funding just because of the last 4 years of the Democrats in Congress would provide enough work for the next 4 years (Conflicts of interest, leaking classified information, blatantly lying to the public, interfering with a presidential campaign (Harry Reid lying about Romney’s taxes, for one); a total disrespect and violation of national security laws and protocols re the use of private computer servers etc; interfering in foreign elections (Kerry, some members of Congress, White House, etc); aiding and abetting our enemies (The Iran Agreement and payoffs); real estate deals using insider information; etc.

You need an Office of Congressional Ethics with real teeth, not a political agenda. We don’t want crooks, crazies and commies in our Congress (i.e. the Alan Graysons of this world; the racist Congressional Black Caucus; the Marxist Progressive Congressional Caucus; and the Soros-funded gang/fronts).

If you are going to clean house, don’t just use Lysol, use Lysol-coated ExLax. It does a better job of getting the crap out than just jabbering about something.


25 posted on 01/02/2017 8:59:04 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They appear to be lying again.


26 posted on 01/02/2017 8:59:38 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I just don’t trust any ‘journalism’ from the NYT to be anything other than propaganda.


30 posted on 01/02/2017 9:09:30 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes, because letting the opposition dictate the rules is always such a good idea.

Been there, done that, now it’s our turn at bat.


31 posted on 01/02/2017 9:12:16 PM PST by factoryrat (We reserve the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Pepsi is upset.....maybe it is a good thing


36 posted on 01/02/2017 9:27:56 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson