Posted on 12/27/2016 6:21:48 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Absolutely.
I watched that segment. That exchange belonged on CNN & MSNBC. It wasn’t much to speak of. Fox News needs to stop inviting these types of guests/pundits that are better suited for Don Lemon.
Nope. Just a figure of speech. We really need to make sure we don't lower ourselves to this level of BS. The guy was just making a point; that's all. He had no intention of killing anyone.
How about if you jump in the mud, but completely miss the hog? Where does that leave you?
The Secret Service needs to have a “Come To Jesus Meeting” with this scrotum sack.
That's what Trump had to do to defeat Hillary.
Notice how the discourse has elevated since the Clintons were expelled from it.
After trump dispatched the Clintons, he returned to the very heights, where he and his family dwell.
Obviously never hunted hogs.
It was sarcasm....
It was sarcastic....
This should be viewed the same way Trump statements are viewed, like when he asked Russia to “Hack” Hillary’s emails (according to the libs):
“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html?_r=0
Ah! Not that I care, but it does explain how his mother got pregnant.
Liberals always talk about killing with such ease and joy.
Yup, the MSM would have piled on such a person until their lives were destroyed.
Someone tell this moron that Trump is not a fat domestic hog like this guy’s constituents. He’s a wild hog. You jump in the mud with one of those and you will need medical attention.
Before this clown, in my entire life, I have never heard of this phrase or of this concept, not even on Duck Dynasty.
To use the word “kill” in this context about the President-elect, is malicious on its face.
I hope you're not arguing that Republicans should adopt the Democrats' standard of behavior. As I mentioned above, I hold Republicans to a higher standard.Why would you assume that is figurative? Granted that’s the only logical assumption, but Sarah Palin spoke of “targets” - and that was taken literally.
. . . or is that a double standard??? That is my point.And actually, my point is - as always - that the Democrats who are journalists hold the Republicans to impossible standards at all times. Just like the Democrats who are politicians do. And there are no Republicans who are journalists, because that is a closed fraternity.
The Democrats have never seen a Republican with chutzpah, and they really believed that with the unlimited chutzpah of their Clintons and Obamas they would win forever. The journalcrats waged war on Trump, and Trump stunned them when he out-chutzpahed Hillary.
Naturally the Democrats - whether journalists or not - are worried.
We had a few set in stone rules when visiting grandparent's farm in the summers like never get behind a horse or play in the grainery....but the one that was told to us over and over.....never get into the pen with the hogs.
Obviously this dumb-adze has never actually attempted to kill a hawg.
GRRRRRREAT post. c_I_c. Thanks for the ping.
PAY ATTENTION BUMP!
It’s a waste of time asking why someone on the left isn’t going to work with Trump.
Who cares what they think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.