Posted on 12/16/2016 9:29:56 AM PST by Non-Compliant_Deplorable
“Assange’s assertion contradicts the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)”
That conehead should be prosecuted too.
Don’t ya love how the never actually claim that the Russians interfered. Only that the intent is there.... unlike Hillary and her server, apparently, and then they wait until it evolves into “the Russian did interfere” after traveling through the rumor mill.
And notice that they never correct it when it becomes misleading.
“To me, it sounds like she’s professing ignorance...”
No one needs convincing about that
“To me, it sounds like she’s professing ignorance...”
No one needs convincing about that
Everyone clamoring for those life boats.
She’s a hack. After Obama goes on vay-cay I wouldn’t be surprised to see her trying to get in to see Trump about a job.
You could cook with what’s left in the bottom of Lynch’s bath tub.
< has not found any evidence of “technical interference” >
+
Depends on what the meaning of the word ‘technical’ is.
Best election evah! The kooky left has lost it! ...
It has been soooo good to see TRUMP blast the msm. He has made them irrelevant.
His administration with Reince is trying to reconfigure the WH press conferences. My vote on this subject is to just cancel them. Trumps administration can then go directly to the people through new media, and also with appropriate visits for FOX (Hannity, etc.) and Breitbart, etc.
Trumps administration needs to completely ignore CNN, MSNBC, ABC, blah blah blah blah... Shut them out.
Lynch instead referred to Russian hacking into the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. However, Julian Assange just announced on FOX NEWS HANNITY last night that the WIKILEAKS’ source for leaked DNC information was not Russia.
He went on to say he and WIKILEAKS had a strict policy of never revealing sources, and it is troubling for him to have to go this far. He wants people to stop concentrating on the source of the leaks, and instead to focus on the actual information which was released to the public.
The following is a portion of the Assange interview with Hannity:”Our source is not the Russian government,” Assange told “The Sean Hannity Show.” “So in other words, let me be clear,” Hannity asked, “Russia did not give you the Podesta documents or anything from the DNC?” “That’s correct,” Assange responded.
Assange’s assertion contradicts the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which concluded in October that “the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.” In addition to the hacked emails from the DNC and Podesta, Assange admitted that Wikileaks received “received about three pages of information to do with the [Republican National Committee] and Trump [during the campaign], but it was already public somewhere else.”
It’s a misquote by the paper. What she really said was “Technically we are running interference while the US Intelligence Community manufactures enough evidence to support our claims about the US Elections and voting machines.”
Is Lynch finally turning her thoughts to life after Hussein?
“Yep, I don’t think Lynch is capable of “coming clean.” “
Well,...if you volunteer to lick the grime out of the cracks in her neck, I would be more than happy to drink beer and watch.
I want her to come clean, all the way clean.
So many have been manipulated by Barky and Her Royal Thighness.
It is possible (not probable, but possible) that she is capable of saving her azzz.
“”She says, “the United States intelligence community has not found any evidence of “technical interference” on the part of the Russian government on voting machines used in the 2016 election.””
The quote marks are mine (beginning and end) - it started out with Lynch’s quote but no quote marks at the last word - election - was that the complete quote or did she have more to say? The link doesn’t have anything more. Why are we always left with questions after reading something - or trying to read something? Is it today’s world or what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.