Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

The substantial argument has always been about the magnitude, though even then there arise questions about margins of error.


2 posted on 12/16/2016 9:26:41 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

A close contact in Exxon-Mobil tells me Tillerson is an unabashed globalist. I have no reason to doubt it.


6 posted on 12/16/2016 9:29:11 AM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Good point. But the liberals have taken this issue and run with it, and put us in a position of being anti science and all that, if we question their orthodoxy.

And the liberals never discuss how there has been climate change for eons. We have had numerous ice ages in earth’s history. During the last ice ageChicago was buried under a mile of ice. How did all that ice melt, if not for global warming???


8 posted on 12/16/2016 9:30:49 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The substantial argument has always been about the magnitude, though even then there arise questions about margins of error.

You raise an interesting point. Man's impact on the atmosphere is not zero. The larger point is that man's impact on the atmosphere is insignificant compared to all the other factors.

22 posted on 12/16/2016 9:45:13 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson