The substantial argument has always been about the magnitude, though even then there arise questions about margins of error.
A close contact in Exxon-Mobil tells me Tillerson is an unabashed globalist. I have no reason to doubt it.
Good point. But the liberals have taken this issue and run with it, and put us in a position of being anti science and all that, if we question their orthodoxy.
And the liberals never discuss how there has been climate change for eons. We have had numerous ice ages in earth’s history. During the last ice ageChicago was buried under a mile of ice. How did all that ice melt, if not for global warming???
You raise an interesting point. Man's impact on the atmosphere is not zero. The larger point is that man's impact on the atmosphere is insignificant compared to all the other factors.