Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fear of the Majority
American Thinker ^ | December 10, 2016 | Richard Winchester

Posted on 12/10/2016 5:37:34 AM PST by Kaslin

In the 1950s and early 1960s, a number of social scientists had a dim view of direct popular influence on public policies.

These individuals had been alarmed by fascist and/or communist movements in Europe in the early decades of the 20th century which received widespread support from the working- and/or lower-middle-classes. During the 1930s, 1940s, and early 1950s, several movements in the United States, such as Huey Long’s Share Our Wealth program, Father Coughlin’s sizable radio audience, William Lemke’s Union Party, and, somewhat later, Joseph R. McCarthy’s supporters, also unnerved many of those already suspicious of grassroots populism.

Their notions crystallized into a body of thought that came to be known as “empirical democratic theory.” Although different writers focused on diverse topics, the theory had basically two commonalities: (1) proponents relied heavily on the then-recently developed practice of scientific public opinion polling; and (2) most of the empirically oriented theorists stressed the mass public’s political limitations. The empirical democratic theorists argued that public opinion polls from the 1930s to the 1950s overwhelmingly documented ordinary people’s passivity, political ignorance, and anti-civil-libertarian proclivities. Consequently, these theorists touted political elites’ critical role in maintaining democratic stability.

For a brief period, the empirical democratic theory held sway among some social scientists.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/10/2016 5:37:34 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

2 posted on 12/10/2016 5:39:56 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

After this election, polls can never again be trusted. All polls and predictions in 2016 were revealed to be “fake news.” The mainstream media is totally discredited and will be fighting for survival by trying to destroy the new digital media. Be vigilant.


3 posted on 12/10/2016 5:43:24 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

An interesting discussion of ‘empirical democracy,’ populism and ‘ruling class.’ But the big difference between democracy (popular small ‘D’) and populism is that one is just mob rule of the largest concentrated infestations of mob democrats and the other is a country-wide general consensus of shared values and expectations.

This country wasn’t founded just for California and New York and a dozen other highly populated cities. They, by themselves, would have been destroyed long ago. These empirical democracy adherents had better spend their time figuring out why the rest of this country called their crap in this election instead of whining about popular vote and “true democracy.”


4 posted on 12/10/2016 5:45:23 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

They are afraid of our proclivities.


5 posted on 12/10/2016 5:46:23 AM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Your graphical presentation tells the story but the real numbers are devastating, especially when the hue and cry is “Hillary Won”

Hillary did win...... 57 counties nation wide. Hillary lost, that is she actually did not win 3082 counties. Hillary won 1.8% of America’s counties.

America rejected Hillary Clinton in a resounding manner


6 posted on 12/10/2016 5:48:37 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

City-state vs County-state is a problem as old a civilization itself.


7 posted on 12/10/2016 5:51:51 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We haven’t even had 65% eligible voter turnout in presidential elections since 1908. Much less for local and state elections. So is that a good thing or a bad thing? Would things be worse or better now if more folks had bothered to vote in the past 100 years or so?

Freegards


8 posted on 12/10/2016 5:58:57 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

An interesting discussion of ‘empirical democracy,’ populism and ‘ruling class.’ But the big difference between democracy (popular small ‘D’) and populism is that one is just mob rule of the largest concentrated infestations of mob democrats and the other is a country-wide general consensus of shared values and expectations.

This country wasn’t founded just for California and New York and a dozen other highly populated cities. They, by themselves, would have been destroyed long ago. These empirical democracy adherents had better spend their time figuring out why the rest of this country called their crap in this election instead of whining about popular vote and “true democracy.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well and truly said, and thank you for saying it.


9 posted on 12/10/2016 8:47:06 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Make nice with your enemies and you will live to regret it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson