Posted on 11/27/2016 12:53:18 PM PST by drewh
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
New Hampshire had less than 3,000 votes separating Trump and Crooked. You’d think for consistency purposes, they’d challenge that state as well. But that is not was the re-count hijinks is all about. It’s about raising money from suckers and filling coffers of socialists for another battle.
Do a REAL recount- eliminating the dead, the illegals and multiple votes THEN see who got the popular vote. It won’t be the brain damaged harridan.
“About time this was shoved in the faces of the Ministry of Propaganda.”
Absolutely!!
Thanks for putting that part of it succinctly.
For anyone breaking the law, face the consequences for vote fraud.
For anyone grossly breaking the law, face the same consequences for treason.
Let’s recount the 3 blue states with the closest margins, subtract all the illegals and felons (thanks, Virginia) and send a deportation list to ICE and local LE.
It is not “probably.”
Gallup surveyed Californians. Of those who admitted to being illegals 13% said they actually voted.
A conservative estimate of 10% nationwide results in a loss of votes for Hillary results in a loss of the popular vote by Hillary.
well...
she raised money very fast because (according to other posters here) it was all automated giving from Soros (who IS backing HilLIARy)
and
she only challenged in three states because those are the three BIG states with fairly close results...that maybe she could have some impact in???? she still cant’ win, of course.
so.....MAYBE she is working for HilLIARy, YES ...BUT maybe, just maybe she is trying to shake HilLIARy/Soros/DNC down for more money too? Again, IF THESE RECOUNTS ARE HONESTLY PERFORMED AS THEY LIKELY WOULD BE ONCE TRUMP GETS HIS PEOPLE IN TO WATCH, then these recounts will necessarily reveal the large-scale DNC vote fraud in the BIG CITIES especically
this could seriously embarrass the DNC and maybe even lead to successful voting reform to remove this problem in future elections
which would terribly disturb and hurt the chances of D wins ever agin in states like PA, MI, IL, WI, NV, MO, and several more where one or two big D-party-boss-controlled big cities swing the results of the entire state
I remain open minded on this, my theory is just a theory but I still think that while Jill has probably shaken a few million loose from SOros etal........that she could wind up collecting many times MORE from them once they realize what they really have at stake in the big “D party machine voting fraud factory” big cities
??????????????? Jill might be ten times as smart as we think
To a Conservative, one Illegal Vote is one too many.
To a Liberal, 3,000,000 Illegal Votes is a good start.
I don’t have a President now, nor have I felt that I had one for more than a decade. But on Jan 20 at 1200, I will feel as if I finally have one! 54 days and 20 hrs and 31 minutes to go!
Damn—that man is awesome at making Liberal head’s explode.
At least 3 million illegals voted, reportedly at least 2 million in California alone.
I've heard estimates that there are 60-70 illegals in America.
And only 3 million voted? I bet the number is a LOT higher.
To Vote: Driver's license, Birth Certificate, Veteran or relative of a Veteran.
We have two years to get this reformed until Nov, 2018. Trump will be on it!
Meant 60-70 Million. .
IIRC, NH has fewer electoral votes than PA,MI, or WI.
There is something like 600,000 illegal aliens that were granted legal status under Obama’s executive action (DACA). I doubt that status will be revoked. What should be done is to pass a law (do away with the executive action) that:
1) continues the DACA status for some period of time (maybe every 2 years)
2) requires a review of these individuals to ensure no felonies
3) require a review of each individual to see if they voted
The democrats would certainly squirm on #3, if they don’t go along, then cancel DACA in its entirety. It would give us a chance to actually see how big a problem we have with illegal aliens voting. I think it dwarfs other types of voter fraud.
If Milt Romley had won the election, he would be apologizing for being called a cheater about now.
And Democrats resist any attempts to reduce voter fraud by implementing voter id? Why is that?
And they were encouraged by Obama.
I don’t know about the dead, but just the people in college who vote where they attend college and by absentee ballot where they’re from and you get to a million people voting twice with no problem.
Both ends.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.