Posted on 11/23/2016 5:57:41 PM PST by jazusamo
President Obama has long been criticized by national security hawks and a Republican presidential field led by Donald Trump for refusing to say the words radical Islam to describe threats posed by terrorist groups such as the Islamic State.
That reluctance wont be a problem for the president-elects national security team, which is flush with nominees who can be expected to employ the term regularly.
The shift will test two deeply opposed worldviews on how to defeat jihadi terrorist groups. Mr. Obama argued that the term radical Islam plays into the propaganda narrative of the Islamic State and other U.S. enemies, falsely suggesting that the West was at war with the worlds 1.7 billion Muslims. Mr. Trump, incoming National Security Adviser Michael T. Flynn and many others say the U.S. and its allies can never win the war on terrorism if they fail to honestly call out the enemy by name.
For eight years, the Obama administration sidestepped the issue of properly defining the threat against the West and its allies and used the nebulous term violent extremists to describe our enemies, said Bill Roggio, an editor of the Long War Journal at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Those 57 countries control the UN as they vote as a bloc.
We need to get out of the UN and throw them out of our nation.
Which Hussein Obama fully supports.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.