Useless? This is a tangible asset that has specific value. No different from any other co-owned item.
In the eyes of a public that has to spend resources to adjudicate it, yes, I believe it is. They had no lasting value. I’d have kept them and maybe paid out the value of the “tickets” at the time of trial.......
Law has to have common sense and not burdensome specificity. Otherwise that trial up in Oregon would have come out differently. We just differ, that’s all.
Something is seriously wrong with people who need to consume justice system resources to sort out this kind of problem.
Useless? This is a tangible asset that has specific value. No different from any other co-owned item.
Yep. She’ll resell it in a minute and pocket the cash.