In the eyes of a public that has to spend resources to adjudicate it, yes, I believe it is. They had no lasting value. I’d have kept them and maybe paid out the value of the “tickets” at the time of trial.......
Law has to have common sense and not burdensome specificity. Otherwise that trial up in Oregon would have come out differently. We just differ, that’s all.
I expect she was disappointed by the ruling. She may have just wanted to keep him from having the tickets.
If I was judge, I would have thought seriously about making him deposit the tickets with the court, with a ruling to follow in a couple of weeks, at which point I would have given them each one of the tickets.