Trump Won the Third Debate (Surprise article from WaPo!)

The Washington Post ^ | October 19, 2016 | Ed Rogers

[manc]

she never gave any plans , no specifics, and certainly was very scripted with her talking points , of which she kept looking down at.

[Bogie]

My wife was watching the debate on Facebook. There was a sidebar for comments and not a one was pro Hillary.

[Beautiful_Gracious_Skies]

I don’t see it that way. Here’s my take.

They all know he won and are in full desperation mode.

The writer, Ed Rogers, likely expressed his true thoughts and then split the scene before he realized he was supposed to write attack-crap.

Or he is their token ‘fair & balanced’ reporter to dispute their overt bias when the other WaPo writers pile on Trump 15 to 1.

[Yo-Yo]

The whole sniffing thing is really exasperating. This is the first debate where is microphone was set up correctly and did not have too much compression and expansion.

I agree but last night Trump couldn't stop playing with the mic.

[Gator113]

Hillary Clinton 56.27%

Donald Trump 43.73%

[bert]

I won’t disagree, but the piece was serious anti hillary, anti DNC propaganda line

[Verginius Rufus]

Who is Ed Rogers? Is he part of their regular editorial board or a token conservative who is allowed to post a column from time to time?

[Beagle8U]

Yup, it needs more FReeping.