Posted on 09/17/2016 10:01:44 AM PDT by Mount Athos
The material from this Clinton Campaign operative's blog is normally banned on FR, but this is just too topical and relevant to pass up so I hope I can be forgiven.
Very interesting admission as Reuters just today issued an article claiming there is no evidence showing Clinton's campaign started the birther accusations. How does an admission by their own campaign operative count as "no evidence"?
Link in discussion below, found via Ace of Spades blog.
Quite simply put, MSM is in the tank for Hillary.
We know that already.
The narrative from the Ministry of Propaganda has no relation to the truth.
How does an admission by their own campaign operative count as “no evidence”?
It appears pretty obvious to me that you haven’t been Hitting the Crack Pipe in the Morning, otherwise you would understand like they do.
/s
Richard Nixon had a guy like this who I do not think was directly employed by tricky dicky. His name was Donald Segretti and was a dirty trickster. He may have even did his work pro bono. He is listed as a member of Creep (aka- committee to reelect the president).
fl
“No evidence” because we scrubbed it all years go! Waddaya think we are, amateurs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.