Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How A 'Don't Tread On Me' Cap Became A Federal Case
Forbes ^ | August 10, 2016 | George Leef

Posted on 08/10/2016 10:57:46 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2016 10:57:46 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I used to hear “it’s a free country” a lot when I was growing up too. Don’t hear that so often these days. I do hear a lot of “there ought to be a law” though. We were better off before.


2 posted on 08/10/2016 10:59:13 AM PDT by rednesss (fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

We need to turn this on liberals. When someone wears a Che shirt or a Black Lives Matter hat or something with some other left-wing icon, file a complaint. This is the only way to get this to stop, unfortunately.


3 posted on 08/10/2016 11:00:13 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wow. I have not heard ‘don’t make a federal case out of it’ in ages. I had totally forgotten that one.


4 posted on 08/10/2016 11:10:57 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

Even on FR there are people who call for things that would be constitutionally unthinkable by traditional standards — if it’s in the interest in giving a malefactor “just desserts.” So this kind of bias against settled law is not just a liberal thang.


5 posted on 08/10/2016 11:11:42 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

They whole thing can be summed up as a whiny liberal snowflake was “offended”. Which goes against his constitutional right to not be offended.


6 posted on 08/10/2016 11:12:05 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is always just one or a thousand or a million more murders away from utopia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Sounds to me like they are treading on that fellow


7 posted on 08/10/2016 11:12:11 AM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

As someone pointed out on a related thread, they’d better get those slave-owners off the money...

Not a Southerner myself, but this mindset will go back to the time when all states had legalized slavery...


8 posted on 08/10/2016 11:16:00 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

There have been schools that have attempted to prohibit the wearing of the American flag on shirts, or displaying it on a backpack.

IIRC, there was a case some years ago of a fire department that forbad the display of American flags on fire trucks.

My recollection is that these attempts were dropped after the public became aware of them. It’s only a matter of time before that public outcry no longer happens.


9 posted on 08/10/2016 11:18:00 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I bet most of the public would be unaware that Gadsen was a slave owner, let alone who he was and that he designed the flag.

This stretches to the point of absurdity, even by today’s standards.


10 posted on 08/10/2016 11:19:07 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX

It appears that this “snowflake” is offended by a flag designed by a man who once owned slaves.
Has anyone pointed out to him that he lives in a country whose very capital city, WASHINGTON, is owned by a man who long ago also owned SLAVES.
Also, his taxes go to that city and his paycheck originates in the city of a “slave owner”. That’s OK.
Hmmm


11 posted on 08/10/2016 11:20:28 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (New York Times: "We print the news as it fits our views.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yes, there are far too many “Freepers” who somehow feel entitled to a pound of flesh, when they aren’t.


12 posted on 08/10/2016 11:21:02 AM PDT by rednesss (fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Clint Eastwood is right.


13 posted on 08/10/2016 11:22:29 AM PDT by kozanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I intentionally wore my bright yellow Gadsden baseball cap to a bar I frequent (too much..) just to see what would happen.

I know the staff very well and know they are 90% libtard, seeing as they are mostly millennials that makes sense..

Well, within 3 minutes of sitting down with my buddy, the server looks at my cap and says “That’s a racist cap!”

.....I went off on her pretty hard lol.. dumb 18yr old..


14 posted on 08/10/2016 11:28:28 AM PDT by CygnusXI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CygnusXI

“That’s a racist cap!”
= = =

And if I take it off, you will see an old, bald, white-man’s head.

Which is MUCH more racist.


15 posted on 08/10/2016 11:32:42 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CygnusXI

You could have just tipped it to her :-)


16 posted on 08/10/2016 11:34:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“These days, however, you don’t hear that so often, probably because it’s now ridiculously common and absurdly easy for people to “make a federal case”...” Unless, that is, it involves a member of the Clinton Crime Family. In that case, nothing, no amount of evidence is sufficient to warrant prosecution.


17 posted on 08/10/2016 11:34:21 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ManHunter

“We ARE the Federal case.”


18 posted on 08/10/2016 11:36:47 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The article on Forbes incorrectly states that the EEOC page doesn’t show the agency’s decision on the matter. It actually does show the decision. It decided the Gadsen flag does NOT represent a historically racist symbol and returned the case to the USPS for further investigation to determine if it could have been used for racial discrimination purposes in the particular instance, as it has in a couple of cases in modern usage. That was the EEOC’s decision.


19 posted on 08/10/2016 12:51:00 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

Mild oppression now.

Brutal oppression later.


20 posted on 08/10/2016 12:53:15 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson