Posted on 07/31/2016 4:08:59 PM PDT by Hojczyk
I get em right every now and then :)
Get *every* wet....sorry,can’t use that word...every “undocumented worker” out.
What’s wrong with saying “Wet backs”?
Hispanics call them “Mojados”.
Here are the points that well addressed to the right audiences would win the election for Trump with ease:
– Roughly three out of four voters— including nearly three out of four Democrat voters— believe that “instead of giving jobs and healthcare to millions of refugees from around the world, we should rebuild our inner cities and put Americans back to work.”
– By a nearly 6 to 1 margin, U.S. voters believe immigration should be decreased rather than increased.
– By a 25-to-1 margin, voters believe that unemployed American workers should get preference for a U.S. job rather than a foreign worker brought in from another country.
– Three out of four voters believe the nation needs “an immigration system that puts American workers first, not an immigration system that serves the demands of donors seeking to reduce labor costs.”
Some time ago I was banned for a while for using it.
Makes my tag even more relevant (sadly).
To be accurate, many never cross the Rio Grande, nor are they from Mexico heading El Norte. It is an entry point for people from all over the world. Some flying into Mexico and using hired “Guides” to ease them across the border then provide transportation to the interior of America, they are coming by sea as well, as well as from the North thru Canada.
Doesn’t matter what the people want - liberals have been shoving leftist $hit down our throats for decades and we just take it.
Immigration should never have been an option for 3rd worlders for this country.
PC has really spread...even to conservative places.
The elites want to be an unelected and unimpeachable ruling gentry class. If they bring in hordes of people that disagree with their host country and owe their allegiance to the ruling class, they can create a voting block that can keep them in power against the will of the people as a whole. They want an "on paper" democracy they can hide behind, but in reality a set of competing groups that will cancel each other's votes out, leaving the ruling class in place.
do away with the automatic “citizenship-at-birth” law.
__________________________________________
there isn’t a law like that...
Ask Khan if you can borrow his brand new and never used copy of the Constitution...
The Federal courts have ruled that the 14th Amendment grants automatic citizenship to *anyone* born here regardless of the legal status of the parents.Many "civilized" countries used to have such a law (referred to as "jus soli") but today the US and Canada are basically the only civilized nations that still do so....but there are a number of backward,Third World,nations that do as well.
again theres not a law like that...
Federal courts do not make law...
that’s the job for Congress...
Hillary is the American Merkel. I wish Trump would use that. It isn’t a scare tactic if it is true.
That’s nice in theory.
The practical reality is quite different.
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868.What I've read indicates that the Federal courts have ruled that,among other things,it grants immediate,unconditional citizenship to *anyone* born here *except* children born to foreign diplomats.
If you can find info to the contrary I'd like to see it because I think the law,as interpreted,stinks to high heavens.
Not certain, but I believe it was Ted Kennedy who introduced legislation that changed the immigration laws to allow for the massive influx of people from third world countries.
“subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
the parents of illegal alien anchor babies are not ....
They deliberately flaunt the laws of our country to enter and prove they do not intend to subject themselves to any part of jurisdiction..
therefore their offspring born here under those conditions are not legally United States citizens...
Plus the 14th Amendment was written for former black slaves born here, not illegal aliens...
PING to #38
BTW you mentioned the children of foreign diplomats that are born here..
do you really think that the children of parents from Mexico here legally to represent their country and who present their credentials to the President of the United States upon arrive cannot be American citizens at birth while the anchor babies of illegal aliens from Mexico who sneak in here illegally and without permission from our government can ???
Why would our Constitution sanction such a lop sided situation ???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.