Posted on 07/25/2016 12:22:47 PM PDT by Kaslin
In a new book, The Trump Revolution: The Donalds Creative Destruction Deconstructed, I argue that Donald J. Trump is the quintessential post-constitutional candidate.
In the Opening Statement, titled Welcome To The Post-Constitutional Jungle, oldies will recognize a nod to the Guns N' Roses classic, Welcome to the Jungle, as well as to broadcaster Mark Levin's coinage.
We inhabit what Levin has termed a post-constitutional America. The libertarian (and classical conservative) ideal—where the chains that tether us to an increasingly tyrannical national government are loosened and power is devolved once again to the smaller units of society—is a long way away.
Where the law of the jungle prevails, the options are limited: Do Americans get a benevolent authoritarian to undo the legacies of Barack Obama, George W. Bush and those who went before? Or, does the ill-defined entity called The People continue to submit to Demopublican diktats, past and present?
The quintessential post-constitutional candidate, Trumps candidacy is for the age when the Constitution itself is unconstitutional. Like it or not, the original Constitution is a dead letter, having suffered decades of legislative, executive and judicial usurpation. The natural- and common law traditions, once loadstars for lawmakers, have been buried under the rubble of legislation and statute. However much one shovels the muck of lawmaking aside, natural justice and the Founders' original intent remain buried too deep to exhume. The Constitution has become just another thing on the list of items presidential candidates check when they con constituents.
The dissembling words of many a Republican presidential candidate notwithstanding—for most promise constitutionalism—a liberty-lovers best hope is to see the legacy of the dictator who went before overturned for a period of time. The toss-up in the 2016 election is therefore between submitting to the Democrats war on whites, the wealthy and Wal-Mart, or being bedeviled by mainstream Republicans wars on the world: Russia, China, Assad and The Ayatollahs.
Or, suffering all the depredations listed and more if Candidate Clinton is victorious.
Thus the endorsement over the pages of The Trump Revolution is not necessarily for the policies of Trump, but for The Process of Trump.
Until such time when the individual is king again, and a decentralized Constitution that guarantees regional and individual autonomy has been restored—this process of creative destruction begun by Donald Trump is likely the best Americans can hope for. Put differently, in this age of unconstitutional government—Democratic and Republican—the best liberty lovers can look to is
And a force of nature Mr. Trump has most certainly proven to be. You name it; Trump has tossed and gored it. The well-oiled elements that sustain and make the American political system cohere are suddenly in Brownian motion, oscillating like never before. An entrenched punditocracy, a self-anointed, meritless intelligentsia (which is not very intelligent and draws its financial sustenance from the political spoils system), oleaginous politicians, slick media, big money: Theyve all worked in tandem to advance a grand government—national and transnational—that aggrandizes its constituent elements, while diminishing those its supposed to serve. These political players have built the den of iniquity Trump is destroying.
Against these forces—RNC, NRO, NATO, a whole alphabet soup of acronyms that stand for statism—is Trump, acting as a political Samson that threatened to bring the house crashing down on its patrons. The hope expressed is that by drastically weakening The Machines moving parts—Trump might just help loosen the chains that bind each one of us to government.
Trump, the book argues, evinces the necessary moxie to blast away at an overweening political system. Who can deny that he has already done a laudable job of fumigating some serious snake pits? Undeterred, the Trump holy terror has even blasted the scold from Fort Vatican for living walled-off in Vatican City, while preaching to Americans that for their security needs, they must reject walls and build bridges. Pope Francis shopworn shibboleths, currently disgorged non-stop by candidate Clinton, are straight out of a Chinese, fortune-cookie wrapper. (Or a Deepak Chopra lecture.)
In a sense, Trump is coming from a libertarian angle: Government lives off the people. Government must, at the very least, serve the people. More laudably, Trump doesnt collapse the distinction between "America" and the U.S. government. To the political cast, "America" is the U.S. government. To them, making America great means making government great. Trump exhibits no confusion of category. He doesnt equate America with the U.S. government. To Trump, making America great means making the people great.
Understandably, The Donald has the political players rising on their hind legs in defense of their realm. And he has hitherto shattered the totems and taboos these players enforce. Debated as never before are vexations like immigration, Islam, and, yes, the legitimacy of the Republican National Committee.
In line with advancing a positive analysis of The Process that is Trump, a close reading of The Trump Revolution will reveal that matters of process are being underscored, such as the differences between political incentives in operation and apolitical incentives in operation: Trumps. Trump cannot be compared to a politician. While his Republican rivals were sponsored by super PAC puppet masters; Trump put-up and pledged to the American People a chunk of his life, his fortune and sacred honor. Other than his position statements over the years, Trump has no policy making past. In the nomenclature of law, one might say Trumps record is clean. The candidate has no political criminal record. (Come to think of it, El Chapo has a cleaner criminal record than the last two American presidents: He had fewer people killed.)
While The Trump Revolution deconstructs the evolution of the Political Trump, this book, at the same time, applauds The Donalds destructive creativity. A masculine force at full tilt, Mr. Trump is creating new reality on the ground. The modest hope expressed in The Trump Revolution is that an utterly different political animal, Donald Trump, might actually do some good for the countrymen he genuinely seems to love.
One of the biggest benefits of a Trump presidency may be the media, Democrats (and maybe the GOPe too) will re-discover the genius of the Founders, the Constitution and the value of the rule of law and the checks and balances of divided government.
We can hope!
Another stupid author who doesn’t listen to Donald Trump and probably has never read the Constitution. What Trump has proposed is very much within the Constitution. He is the pro-Constitution candidate. Hillary and all the others are the counter-American Revolution and anti-Constitution candidates.
Whoever wrote this article doesn’t have the brains God gave a puissant!!!
If you are a Trump Supporter you know what Trump stands for, what he says, how he says it...
The man can be a brilliant speaker, he needed to get to the ‘dumbed down’ middle class people, where he lives, works, hires, listens, this is how he had to talk at his rallies, he had to grab their attention span, which wasn’t that long and zero in on his points...
He did an amazing job of it, it sure got over half of the American People and over 14 million new voters didn’t it???
And the man walked away from the roll call vote with over 1700 delegates...call the man anything you want, but don’t call this man stupid, far from it, he already is a year into his Presidency and we haven’t even gotten to Nov. yet...
This is a very confusing article, but the author tries to make the point that the Constitution has been so mutilated by laws, regulations, and Supreme Court rules that it’s no longer the real Constitution. Trump is our only hope for making the Constitution whole again.
I think you have the right of it. Mercer is, in my opinion, very much a libertarian philosophically (versus politically, like Anderson).
She filters everything through that lens, as would any dedicated ideologue (here a term of description, not derogation).
I have read a fair sampling of her articles. She is highly intelligent.
Loadstars??
Another stupid author who doesnt listen to Donald Trump and probably has never read the Constitution. What Trump has proposed is very much within the Constitution. He is the pro-Constitution candidate. Hillary and all the others are the counter-American Revolution and anti-Constitution candidates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.