Posted on 07/07/2016 6:46:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
Editor's Note: This column was coauthored by Ken KluKowski.
This week marks twenty-five years since President George H.W. Bush named Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court, inaugurating a tenure marked by unwavering commitment to principled originalism.
Justice Thomass life is an only-in-America success story. As movingly recounted in his autobiography, My Grandfathers Son, Clarence Thomas was born into extremely modest circumstances, then raised by his maternal grandparents when his mother became unable to provide for him and his brother. This man of humble origins eventually made his way to Yale Law School, quickly rose through the ranks of public service to become a federal appeals judge, and ultimately ascended to the nations highest court at age 44.
One of us (Blackwell) has been privileged to call Clarence Thomas a friend for more than 30 years, and shared a close advisor who mentored them both, former Brandeis president Morris Abram. Your other author (Klukowski) is a constitutional lawyer and former law clerk to a highly respected federal appeals judge. Looking at Justice Thomas through both of these lenses, he must be called nothing short of a national treasure.
Justice Thomass judicial opinions reflect who he is as a person: unpretentious, loving liberty, embracing the role that the Constitution assigns to the Supreme Court in our self-governing republicand emphatically rejecting the temptation to expand the powers of the Court by constitutionalizing his personal preferences. He eschews flowery language and witty turns of phrase in favor of a plain, direct, powerful exposition of what the law is.
His approach to interpreting the Constitution can be summed up in a single word: originalism. Justice Thomas believes that any legal textwhether the Constitution, a statute, or some lesser authority such as a regulationshould be interpreted according to those words public meaning at the time that the American peoples representatives adopted them. It is the ultimate respect that an unelected leader can show to the democratic process.
One of the most remarkable features of Justice Thomass originalism is how low of a bar he sets for the doctrine of stare decisis where the Constitution is concerned. That general judicial policythat precedent must be adhered to unless special circumstances require overruling itcan be perilous when the Supreme Court is interpreting the Constitution. If the Court misinterprets a statute or regulation, elected leaders can supersede that decision by amending the law. But it is extremely difficultdeliberately and rightly soto amend the Constitution.
Consequently, Justice Thomas has called for rejecting even longstanding constitutional doctrines that have set the nation upon a permanent departure from the Constitutions commands. For example, the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine says that states cannot pass laws that burden interstate commerce, even when Congress chooses not to enact a contrary interstate commercial statute. Similarly, while the Constitution enables Congress to preempt state laws concerning Congresss powers enumerated in the Constitution, implied preemption is a nuanced doctrine that coddles federal power by nullifying state laws that are in various ways at odds with federal law, even when Congress is silent.
Justice Thomas rightly says that he will have none of it. If Congress wants to unburden interstate commerce, it can pass a law to do so. If Congress wants to supersede state law on a matter committed to Congress in Article I of the Constitution, Congress can pass a state expressly preempting those state laws. The current era of muscular federal power showcases that courts need not coddle federal power to protect Washington from the states.
Often Justice Thomas stands alone, such as when he writes that the Constitutions Establishment Clause does not apply to the sovereign states, that federal rights can be asserted against the states if encompassed by the Fourteenth Amendments Privileges or Immunities Clause, not the Due Process Clause, and that no one has a constitutional right to sell violent video games to children, because in 1791 (when the First Amendment was ratified) children did not have a right to procure objectionable material, and merchants had no right to sell to children without their parents consent. Each of these is unquestionably correct according to the original meaning of those constitutional provisions, as seen in their text, structure, and history.
For those who wonder why Justice Thomas would go it alone when necessary, he pointed out to a Federalist Society audience in 2013, It took Harlan 60 years, but he finally won. This was a reference to Justice John Harlans 1896 solo dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson that separate but equal is unconstitutionala position that became the law of the land in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. It other words, Justice Thomas is writing for history: Be right on the law, ignore politics and the passions of the moment, and have faith that one day Americathrough its president and Senatemay appoint a Supreme Court majority that agrees, and makes it official.
Regardless of whether Justice Thomass adherence to the original meaning of the Constitution ever becomes ascendant in American law, his legacy is one of which the Framers would be proud.
A good VP candidate in Trumps 2nd term. Rub their noses in it and while you’re at it pardon Sirhan Sirhan.
I will always have a place in my heart for Justice Thomas. The lowly DemocRATS put this man AND HIS FAMILY through hell during his confirmation hearing. He stood up to them and won.
I read Justice Thomas’ autobiography years ago. After reading his opinions, also, on numerous cases, all I have is great admiration for such a brilliant, well-informed mind, when he had such a rocky early childhood and many reasons to give up on life and throw in the towel.
He is truly one of the Greats in American history. Adversity truly creates Great Minds.
Whenever I think about who I’d like to have Dinner with before I die....Justice Thomas is the one. I’m hoping to run into him in an RV park sometime in the future
He is amazing. My heart broke for him when he was being skewered by the disgusting Left.
What an honorable, honest, and brilliant justice he has been. He has always been trusted to make the correct decisions for this country and he has always followed through.
God bless Justice Thomas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.