Posted on 06/22/2016 9:14:44 AM PDT by simpson96
Throughout the 2016 campaign, one of the biggest problems facing Hillary Clinton’s campaign has been her apparent inability to gain the trust of voters.
Republican Donald Trump has capitalized on this problem and constantly referred to former Secretary of State Clinton as “Crooked Hillary”, and is even giving an entire speech this afternoon to highlight her “failed policies and bad judgment.”
Is this an effective strategy? Do young voters know—or care—about Hillary’s past missteps?
Campus Reform hit the streets to find out, and the results were fascinating.
Nearly every young person we spoke with was shocked to learn that the list of quotes presented to them belonged entirely to Hillary Clinton and not Donald Trump.
“Which candidate made a joke about colored people time saying that black people are always late?” Campus Reform asked.
“Trump... because he’s racist,” one student responded.
“Which candidate suggested a 12 year-old rape victim made up accusations because she enjoyed ‘fantasizing about older men’,” we asked.
Students were again shocked to discover the answer was not Trump, but Hillary.
“What she said about the rape victim was the worst,” a student replied.
“She’s kind of a sketchy person because she is about feminism and everything, but then I saw this quote,” another noted with a sense of betrayal.
Upon discovering that Clinton is more than capable of matching Trump in the insensitivity department, many students admitted that their opinion of her had soured.
“Makes me dislike her even more I guess,” one offered, while another stated that “she’s very untrustworthy in my eyes.”
One student disgustedly speculated that “She’s just going with whatever is hot at the moment.”
Summing up the reactions, one respondent explained that “if she claims to stand for all these things, but then she says the opposite, then people would probably question voting for her.”
Watch the video to see more reactions!
(Excerpt) Read more at campusreform.org ...
I will never get over her heading up the “Nuts and Sluts” team at the White House. Such a feminist!
It's one of the dominant features of the Democrats -- they just say stuff.
The truth means nothing to them. They say stuff that "feels right" at the moment and then they forget all about what they said. Because their words means nothing. But if they can persuade you to give them more power, then it's all good. Right?
Bookmarking
The only reason more of the young voters have been unable to get the real information about Hildabeast is that they are indoctrinated with information that protects her from the media and the Department of Education in schools. If the truth ever get out, like I’m hoping Trump will throw out, she’s toast.
red
That and it’s not about facts and the accuracy of the story, it’s about the “narrative” and whether it fits...
Yes, the whole concept of “the narrative” needs to be discarded. It’s just a convenient shorthand for saying, “I’ve made up a lovely little story which helps me push my ideological agenda and will allow me to push people like you into the dirt”. Most of what the media and the politicians say is simply designed to fit “the narrative”.
How about some Truth?
Whatever fits - dodging bullets at the airport.
“We will have to *take* some things from you..... “, is my personal favorite.
Can’t quite remember how she ended the sentence.. something like, “for the common good” was the point.
Have that Bumper Sticker on the fridge.
Drive an old car that’s already been keyed, So my obummer ‘In your guts, you know he nuts’ sticker on the car is only an improvement.
The classic lost millennial response to the truth:
“Oh, wow...”
Bookmark for some great video links.
The fundamental facts of “liberalism” are:
- Whereas T. Roosevelt said, “the credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena . . . who does actually try to do the deeds,” socialists are cynical critics who insist that the credit belongs the them.
- Journalists perceive, rightly, that bad news sells, and “No news is good news” because good news “isn’t news.” Bad news is the journalist’s stock-in-trade. But . . .
- A laser-like focus on bad news is not “objectivity,” it is a bias. Journalism is inherently biased, because a negative bias enables journalists to make money.
- Journalists know that they are focused on the negative, and yet they insist that they are objective. But . . .
- Equating negativity with objectivity is a perfect definition of “cynicism.”
- ”The narrative” is that people are cynical about the work of producing goods or services are virtuous “public servants” or “objective journalists.”
For later
I see a first rate ad in this copy.... We want the young vote? We want the Sanders vote?
Put this OUT TO THE PUBLIC...
(oh and Donald Trump - dump the current “I never had sex with that woman’ ad... people don’t get sarcasm at that level unless their very connected to what’s happenign)
I have a T-Shirt that says, “Atlas Shrugged - Now in non-fiction.”
Great job, corbe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.