![”Image](http://i44.tinypic.com/9ulyxd.jpg";)
.
Back to the thread.
Check out # 27 (secret cash fund,)
# 29 , (note the question in # 29, who could it possibly be?)
and # 32 .
.
Posted on 04/30/2016 8:12:41 AM PDT by rktman
.
Back to the thread.
Check out # 27 (secret cash fund,)
# 29 , (note the question in # 29, who could it possibly be?)
and # 32 .
.
Shrillary ‘lost’ the 6B.
Probably stashing it to buy up coal mining properties for pennies on the dollar...and old power plants.
You have to keep in mind who sets the thresholds for what is considered to be excessive levels of contamination.
Those targets change, generally getting more stringent (lower) due to research on the harmful effects of the contaminants. I’m not sure who funds the studies on which contaminants are harmful at what level, but it would be interesting if the EPA had a hand in funding the research that it used to rewrite the standards that it used to determine what was and was not a Superfund site...
It would be the closest thing to perpetual motion (or a “Mexican fur farm” operation) yet.
Yep.
I hate to be the one to point this out, but if a businessman had been stashing ‘petty cash’—and compared to the Gov’t budget this is petty cash, then they would not have made such a balls-up of hiding it like these politicians and bureaucrats have. It would have ‘trickled’ into an offshore account somewhere by now.
Maybe the EPA accepted a deposit from the State Department.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.