Posted on 04/04/2016 3:55:31 AM PDT by HomerBohn
The issue of pedophilia is once again making its way into the mainstream. Researchers are now claiming that it is normal for men to feel a sexual attraction to young, pre-pubescent children. As the homosexual rights movement continues to gain ground, we hear more and more about the normalization of pedophilia in our culture. There is a definite agenda to normalize sexually deviant behavior while pushing for pedophile rights.
Pedophiles are actively seeking to lower the age of consent laws when it comes to lawful sexual behavior with another. They claim that sex with children is not only a natural desire felt by adult males, but that, in many cases, the children affected may actually benefit from it as opposed to experiencing harm.
Many sodomite rights activists also push the idea that child sexual abuse committed against young boys is not a homosexual problem, but one of heterosexual males instead. This is a sick, twisted agenda being pushed under the guise of a human rights campaign backed up by fallacious research supporting the desires of sodomites. If not stopped, this could have dire consequences for the future of humanity.
It has long been understood that children who have suffered from child sexual abuse were likely to experience severe trauma from the event. Researchers have long concluded that feelings of sexual confusion, worthlessness, depression, and suicidal thoughts were associated with sexual abuse. In many cases, even post traumatic stress disorder has been thought to be a consequence. The rates for reported mental health issues, according to a report published in the Journal of Pediatric Health Care, is higher for people who self report for child sexual abuse.
The rates are higher for women, 56%, as opposed to 47% for men. The rates for mental health issues among those with no history of child sexual abuse are significantly lower, 32% for women and 34% for men. This report also finds that boys will most likely experience a fifteen fold increase in suicidal tendencies as opposed to those who have not experienced sexual abuse while girls have a threefold increase for suicidal behavior. This is generally after introducing treatments for depression and other symptoms. Based on these findings and what has generally been known about child sexual abuse, children suffer greatly when abused by adults. This is the reason pedophilia has long been treated as a crime. Things are rapidly changing. Pedophilia is now considered more of a “sexual orientation” among many in the scientific community.
The latest edition of the DSM, the DSM V, was going to classify pedophilia as a sexual orientation, but revised its decision after receiving backlash from the public. This doesn’t change the fact that there are still those seeking to normalize sex with children.
Lately, many academic papers have been surfacing which claim to dispute the findings that sexual abuse is harmful to children. In fact, many of these papers claim that there is a benefit to children under certain circumstances and that harm is generally only experienced when a child is molested against their will. The Journal, Pedophilia Unbound: Theory, Research and Practice, is a collection of these types of fraudulent “scientific papers.”
In the first chapter entitled “Tabooed Child Sexuality,” the author writes that the sexual experiences of children are not less important than those of adults and that children, like adults, are normal sexual beings. The chapter itself seems to suggest that because pedophilia is a common occurrence around the world, it is normal and child sexuality should be studied. The author comments on the difficulties of taking on such an endeavor when child sexuality is hampered by so many taboos.
This is the type of sick, demented thinking that is currently plaguing our society. Just because sex between adults and children may be a normal occurrence across the globe does not make it right. On page 79 of this publication is a paper published by Bruce Rind and Robert Bauserman entitled "An Estimate of Consequences of Adult–Non adult Sex for the Non adults in the General Population," this paper claims that sex between adults and children can be beneficial, especially between men and young boys.
They cite studies which claim that the effects of adult child sex are based on several different factors, including how knowledgeable the child is about sex, the level of willing participation, and the child’s personal views on the negative connotations about sex, especially in the western world.
This, of course, implies that the western world’s views on sex, particularly sex between adults and children, is outdated. This paper further suggests that studies proving harmful affects of child sexual abuse are based on the biased samples of the population, meaning that the studies proving harmful effects are all from children who have “self reported” child sexual abuse, and that they were likely to already have problems. Children who have allegedly experienced no harm from adult-child sex generally do not see a clinician; therefore, few studies are conducted on the benefits of such experiences. Other studies cited by this paper also claim that many boys benefit from sexual relationships with older men because it provided the opportunity to have a positive, influential relationship.
To Rind and Bauserman’s, credit they also admit that such samples are also based on a bias because researchers that support this may be deliberately seeking out people who have had positive experiences. The fact that sexual activities of children is even studied, encouraged, or considered a normal part of their being is, indeed, disturbing all together.
There is also the issue of homosexuals claiming that pedophilia is a heterosexual problem as opposed to a homosexual problem. According to Steve Baldwin, in his paper entitled “Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement,” homosexual activist groups claim that the accusations of child molestation being a homosexual thing lends credibility to the idea that there is an effort to demonize and discredit the homosexual movement.
This would be an example of the homosexual activists playing the victim role if you will. Research on the subject, according to Baldwin, suggests, however, that male homosexuals are far more likely to molest young boys as opposed to heterosexuals. After all, as Baldwin writes in his paper, it is generally sodomites that advocate for the lowering of age of consent laws and not straight men.
“Using twisted logic, pro-gay academics argue in various social science journals that the molestation of boys is not a sodomite lifestyle issue and that such men are not really homosexuals. It is simply amazing that sodomite propagandists and sexology “experts” are successfully bamboozling the public and the media into believing that a man’s exclusive focus on young males should not be defined as homosexuality! But if an exclusive attraction of a male to other males of any age is not homosexuality, what is?” (Baldwin)
Furthermore, sodomite rights groups, according to Baldwin, are actively seeking to lessen the penalties for sexual activity with underaged boys, claiming that it is a violation of civil rights. This is the consequence of moral relativism and multiculturalism coming home to roost. The fact is that attraction to young boys is almost exclusively a homosexual problem. Baldwin writes that very few homosexuals are attracted to older men, and that according to the journal, Archives of Sexual Behavior, cited by Baldwin, 86% of pedophiles consider themselves to be homosexual.
As the sodomite rights agenda moves forward, little attention is being paid to the possible consequences concerning the safety of our children, and more attention is being paid to the idea of feeling like we are not being overly judgmental. Homosexuality is not conducive to good health, as they are more prone to suffer from sexually transmitted diseases and environments that may not be clean and sanitary. According to the Family Research Center, these facts point to homosexuality creating risk for others, as well.
We certainly do not want to create a hostile environment toward homosexuals in general; however, it must be recognized that there is an element of that population that has in its sights the lowering of age of consent laws and normalizing pedophilia in order to satisfy their sexual desires. If there is not an effort to stop this and the idea that this is a human rights issues moves forward, we could be causing untold damage to generations of children who should look to adults for protection, not live in fear of them or have sexual relationships with them. This is sick.
each state should re=establish orphanages for disadvantaged youth and establishment of a county home for orphans and those children who are otherwise neglected. Keep the hands of the foster perverts.
If we are going to pay for an orphanage let it be run by the county and staffed with good and wholesome men and women who have had a background check.
The media preached the lies of Kinsey for a couple of decades and the majority of people accepted them as fact. Looks like the next wave of lies preached as the truth are on the way.
The Catholic abuse scandal that everyone focuses on was in reality over 90% adult males molesting post-pubescent boys. Wait until this round of lies takes root and that'll be nothing compared to the wave of very, very, young children being raped to death with the media excusing the murderers as having been "born that way".
Murdering innocents in the womb and protecting horrible perverts, that's what this nation has come to.
JMHo
Who defines what is "hostile?" If hostile means pointing out homosexuality is a deviant lifestyle and one that is banned as such on a biblical basis as well as moral one, then so be it, then we are to become hostile towards a lifestyle that tears apart every society that accepts it as "normal."
The sodomites took over psychology way back in the 70s and have been getting worse since then.
“Researchers are now claiming that it is normal for men to feel a sexual attraction to young, pre-pubescent children.”.....
Shows you how sick and distorted those “researchers” are. It is NOT NORMAL, it’s SICK! Suggesting that pedophilia is “normal” only enhances those who believe it is “ok”.
“We certainly do not want to create a hostile environment toward homosexuals in general”
And why not? Faggies hate “breeders” in general and women in particular, and are imposing their sick, twisted lifestyle on the rest of society. Why not a healthy backlash?
NAMBLA is not even mentioned here. The male coprophiliacs have been trafficking and abusing young boys for centuries and now, it is rarely mentioned, why, because these queers now have the legal right to buy, aka adopt, young boys.
“normal for men to feel a sexual attraction to young, pre-pubescent children”
Well then I guess I’m NOT normal by their definition.
I have always considered myself a pretty tolerant person, in a kind of live and let live form. However, when those lifestyles or "race" for that matter impose my on personal space, well being, or pocketbook, I start drawing the line.
I am disgusted by the outward force feeding of the new "gay normalcy" down our throats. When I see a gay couple in a commercial, I black list that product forever,
“Faggies hate “breeders” in general and women in particular”
Not that I know so much about being gay, but adult male women-haters are generally thought of as being misogynists and not necessarily homosexual. I remember watching the Three Stooges as they joined the “He-Man Woman Haters Club” and it wasn’t because they were coming out of the closet.
Sparta. No longer exists.
So it is with homosexuality. It cannot possibly lead to the creation of new life. It can only corrupt life brought into this world by God.
That is the only way that homosexuals can "reproduce". By corrupting innocents just as they have corrupted themselves.
There were many more episodes depicting the Three Stooges with girlfriends or wives. Stella, Nella, & Bella come to mind.
A hetero misogynist may have been unlucky in love or suffered through a bad divorce.
If faggies don’t hate women (the natural menstrual cycle really disgusts them to the core) then why is it that when a bar owner converts his/her property to a gay bar, the first order of business is to fire all of the female wait staff?
I might head to Chick Fil-A for lunch today.
;^)
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, SCOTUS, once wrote a paper supporting lowering the age of consent to eleven years old, 11.
Clinton appointed her, and Clinton hung out with the pedophile billionaire democrat.
“why is it that when a bar owner converts his/her property to a gay bar, the first order of business is to fire all of the female wait staff?”
Probably because it’s not the kind of sex that sells in a gay bar.
Awhile back I knew a fellow who confided he’d been repeatedly raped since he was a toddler by his own father.
Dad was prominent in the community, and a well respected family man, married with 4 children. But he had a secret life as a pedophile and was a celebrity in the local gay bars.
The “mother” (spit!) was a perfect enabler; she pretended to be clueless, even when the boy, at age 12, had to have surgery to repair several inches of his rectum. Neither the pediatrician nor anyone on the surgical team called the cops, either. This was the hardest part for me to believe.
After the boy recovered from the surgery, the abuse resumed and continued until he left home at 17. He didn’t try to fight it, he said. Mom by this time was a serious alcoholic, passing out drunk every night and not seeing anything.
I asked my friend why didn’t he ever report his father to the cops.
He said his dad was well respected in the town and no one would believe him, “And anyway, he’s my dad. I love him.”
My friend suffered horribly. He wasn’t able to tell anyone until his father was dead. How many other children suffered as well, due to his reluctance to “out” his abuser?
If my comments in this forum about homosexuals seem particularly vitriolic, this is why.
“Sparta. No longer exists.”
I’m not sure what your point is but if it is that Sparta was a city that reveled in homosexuality, then I think you’re off base. Even homosexuals admit that’s a myth:
http://www.rainbowromancewriters.com/node/796
Seriously? LOL
http://all-that-is-interesting.com/unusual-rites-passage/2
warning, graphic ancient vase.
“In The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta Paul Rahe aims to restore the Herodotean balance. Without downplaying the Athenian contribution he begins with Sparta. The Spartan political system was one of checks and balances: two royal families, five annually rotating elected officials (ephors), a senate (gerousia) of men over sixty and a popular assembly of all citizens (Homoioi or “equals”). Their way of life enforced a military commitment to the state over individual achievement or family life. Men spent the years from seven to 45 with their military unit while contacts with birth family and married family were discouraged in favor of relationships between older and younger men we might call “male bonding.” Rahe prefers the franker term “pederasty.” “
http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2016/03/an-ancient-clash-of-civilizations
E. Christian Kopff teaches ancient Greek literature and the Bible in the Honors Program of the University of Colorado Boulder.
I learned about it in world history.
“Abstract
Dorian Crete and Thebes are conventionally seen by ancient sources as the originators of pederasty; modern historians see support for this view in Dorian male-centered militarism and sexual segregation in upbringing. Here athletic culture, including training, nudism, and competition, is argued to be a chief ‘trigger’ for the emergence of pederasty in Sparta and its relatively rapid spread to other Greek states in the seventh to sixth centuries BC. Athletic nudity, in particular, was not a device to enforce civic egalitarianism, as some have argued, but is a persistently erotic incentive that reinforces hegemonic maleness and advertises the individual’s virtuous exercise of restraint. In particular, Sparta is found to be the likely source of generalized athletic nudity combined with open pederasty in the early seventh century BC. Nudism in Greek art is erotically charged and not, as others argue, simply a gender marker in the seventh century. Generalized athletic nudity spread to other Greek states emulating the successful Spartan model by the ‘athletic revolution’ of the early sixth century. With athletic nudity, open pederasty, again following Sparta, was fostered.”
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v49n03_03
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.