Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey: Americans’ view of marriage weakens with support of homosexuality
LifeSiteNews ^ | 3/21/16 | Father Mark Hodges

Posted on 03/21/2016 8:32:10 AM PDT by wagglebee

WASHINGTON, D.C., March 21, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – The National Survey of Family Growth concludes that while more and more Americans support homosexual "marriage," they simultaneously support marriage less and less.

The U.S. Health and Human Services survey, using data from 2011 to 2013, revealed increasing apathy toward marriage in general and a disconnect from the positive role marriage should play in families and individuals.

Sixty percent of women ages 15-44 say sodomy is "all right" (up from 42 percent in 2002). Seventy-five percent of women say gay couples should be able to adopt vulnerable children (up from 55 percent). Among men, approval of homosexual adoption is up from 47 percent in 2002 to 68 percent.

Seventy-eight percent of women say it's perfectly fine to bear children out of wedlock (up from 70 percent). And nearly three quarters of both men and women are okay with unmarried, cohabiting couples raising a child without even planning a wedding.

Marriage has become so disconnected from sex and children that a majority of young adults defend fornication on moral grounds, saying cohabitation "helps prevent divorce" later on.

Family Research Council senior fellow Peter Sprigg says the results are not surprising, because the politically correct approval of homosexuality goes hand in hand with decaying morals.

"Greater acceptance of the homosexual movement tends to reinforce the breakdown of traditional norms with regard to sexual behavior among heterosexuals as well," the Washington Times quotes the pro-family leader as saying. "I think the two things are mutually self-reinforcing."

"I think it is very unfortunate," Sprigg said. "The idea that cohabitation will somehow prevent divorce has been completely debunked by the social science. We have a lot of research on that, and it's quite clear that people who cohabit before marriage and more likely to get divorced, not less."

Ed Vitagliano, executive vice president of the American Family Association (AFA), told LifeSiteNews, "So the American public has rejected what God has clearly communicated about mankind in nature – that we are male and female? We have ignored what nature says about marriage? Then we should not be surprised when our ignorance only increases."

"As a people, we are embracing same-sex marriage, which results in despising the gift of male-female marriage itself," Vitagliano explained. "We can expect the darkness to only increase."

The pro-family leader then noted what the Bible teaches about how, when men turn away from what is natural, they turn away from the Creator. "Sometimes Christians read Romans 1:18-32 as if the passage is only about homosexuality, when it is about so much more than that. It is about seeing God in nature and rejecting Him," Vitagliano said. "Then a downward death spiral commences."

Romans 1:18-32, written by the Apostle Paul, talks about "men who by their wickedness suppress the truth." It explains that the existence of God "is plain to them," because God has shown "His eternal power and deity" through creation, and thus, God "has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made." Men who refuse to acknowledge and honor God "or give thanks to Him" become "futile in their thinking and their senseless minds ... darkened.  Claiming to be wise, they become fools[.]"

The AFA's Ed Vitagliano offers hope out of mankind's malaise. "The good news is that the rest of Romans points the way out of the darkness," he told LifeSiteNews.  "Perhaps God will grant the repentance necessary – both inside and outside of the church – so that revival might come."

"Then the spiral down into deeper darkness will halt, and light can flood the land once again."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; samesexmarriage
The U.S. Health and Human Services survey, using data from 2011 to 2013, revealed increasing apathy toward marriage in general and a disconnect from the positive role marriage should play in families and individuals.

That's because the left's goal has NEVER been "marriage equality," it has been the DESTRUCTION of marriage.

1 posted on 03/21/2016 8:32:10 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 03/21/2016 8:32:50 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Perversion is now acceptable.


3 posted on 03/21/2016 8:33:17 AM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

As fewer people get married then one of the last bastions of marriage will end up being in the polygamous communities.

No small irony that.


4 posted on 03/21/2016 8:34:11 AM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Tolerating deviancy never works. For deviants will always seek the next lowest level. Accept men marrying men today and tomorrow they will be looking for us to accept a marriage of three people. Or bestiality. Or pedophilia. It will never end. There will always be a lower level to sink to and this nonsense will not stop until we as a society collectively draw a line in the sand and say NO MORE!


5 posted on 03/21/2016 8:38:44 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (678); Cruz (423); Kasich (143)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

Just like the effect of showing ultrasounds on the hearts of pregnant women.

We have to show videos of the sodomy and perversion before we take the surveys like the ones cited herein.


6 posted on 03/21/2016 8:42:58 AM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

These polls are beyond worthless. When you poll people in NYC, DC, Chicago, and LA/San Fran that are in the welfare system what do you thing the outcome will be?


7 posted on 03/21/2016 8:43:54 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Tolerating deviancy never works

A civilization needs laws, morals, pride, and a positive cultural identity. Folks need to have an identity in families, communities, nations, other positive organization.

If folks aren't held to a high standard and some shared responsibility, too many let their inner beast take over.

Most of civilization is "running on empty" in every aspect of what promotes civilized behavior. There's a not-so-invisible hand that is tearing it all down, with the goal of acquiring all power and possessions for an elite few.

Yeah, I really believe that.

8 posted on 03/21/2016 8:59:07 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

Indeed indeed, my friend.


9 posted on 03/21/2016 9:02:58 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

If a gay party counts as a marriage, why would anyone care about marriage? Of course support for real marriage is dropping - as planned.


10 posted on 03/21/2016 9:03:39 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to meand over an is worthless." - Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

We had a 50% Divorce Rate before Gay Marriage was Legalized.

I guess it will be 75% before you know it.

Just wait until Incestuous Marriage and Polygamous Marriage goes mainstream.


11 posted on 03/21/2016 9:03:44 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat Party. (Or the GOPe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

For “happy slavery” it is essential to destroy Individualism in early childhood-—that Christian worldview which created the US Constitution and the Minds of the Founders——that Christian ideal of Free Will and Individual Natural Right from God only. It has to be destroyed to encase the child’s mind into a small controlled box—trans-humanism of Huxley.

The satanists (globalists who control MSM) destroy Common Sense and that idea of unique/individual “worth” by putting babies outside that mother/father paradigm-—that unique biological contract which creates understanding and connection with the past/present/future.

When cultures are allowed to be polygamous or homosexual-—like the Spartans/Samurai and today’s Afghanis——all connections become a “group”—a collective with NO individualism. Your identity is embedded into a “group” only psychology.

The ability to see oneself as an individual is lost in collectives/group cultures which is the “normal” for thousands of years—that serf/peasant/class mindset which is “happy” in slavery to an oligarchy/few elites.

It is CRUCIAL for the elites to destroy early childhood and get children away from the biological mother/father paradigm. Christianity is the ONLY worldview which could create the Age of Reason and Individualism which existed in America for over a hundred years before the Revolution. It was a mindset created in childhood-—that Davy Crockett refusal to allow elites to control any of their actions and their private property.

Families were self-sufficient and free in America which was unknown to all European cultures at the time-—male/women equal partnering which was close to Natural Law (Design/Roles) to raise Common Sense, independent thinkers who refused to be conditioned to fear disagreeing with large “groups”. They couldn’t be controlled or programmed (MSM) and have their attitudes and emotions controlled by “group (non) think” elites who owned all MSM since 1917-—so they could control what children “think” and “feel”——Up is Down, Good is Evil. The Progressives (Marxists) knew that getting young children hooked into their screens/radio-agitprop would program their emotions and attitudes-—they could force the masses to smoke-—go to war-—ANYTHING-—as long as they could get to the minds of children (media/culture (Edward Bernays/Freud’s nephew).

Parents now allow perverts/strangers to program their very young children with their satanic/pagan worldview 24/7 if they set them in front of the TV or radio, etc.

There is ONLY one worldview capable of creating Free Will and Individual Natural Rights from God which is embedded in the early childhood years where children see the loyalty of mother to one father (true equality) and visa verso. When that loyalty/trust/design in Natural Law (science) is divided or destroyed-—the Worth of the child is shattered—Common Sense is made difficult and the childhood trauma creates no trust-—no unity-—collapse of culture.

Multiple unrelated people create chaos when not tied to biology-—and jealousy and hate and chaos is greater with “more” people. It is hard enough to deal with one other person intimately without jealousy and hate.

God designed male and female for that commitment and devotion which gives stability and meaning (past/future/present) to a child (individualism/uniqueness)-—that they NEED to survive and flourish without all the emotional baggage and ability to be controlled by groups with the loss of virtue (ability to think outside the box) which collapses cultures.


12 posted on 03/21/2016 9:08:54 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There is nothing normal or natural about homosexuality.

It breeds disease and mental illness,nothing more.Trying to tie something like that,to an institution like marriage-doesn’t work.

The government should stop promoting this nonsense.


13 posted on 03/21/2016 9:12:06 AM PDT by Del Rapier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
My nephew has a beautiful girlfriend and they've been together for some 3 years. I suggested to my 75 year old liberal parents that my nephew should marry his girlfriend.

I'm still offended by my parent's reaction. They looked at me like I was an alien and ask "WHY should they get married?".

It's hard to even be around liberals anymore.

14 posted on 03/21/2016 9:15:42 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Support? Is that what they call being legally blackmailed into a particular point of view nowadays?


15 posted on 03/21/2016 9:18:23 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a person as created by the Law of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The denigration of our society was accelerated by the acceptance of oontraception by the Anglican Church in the twenties, which resulted in a lack of respect for both mean’s and women’s nature and a subtle encouragement to toss away sexual self mastery.

It was further helped along by Playboy mentality, no fault divorce, Gay rights which meant gay acceptance and finally gay marriage.

Who imposed it on us? Who bought into it? What is the remedy?


16 posted on 03/21/2016 9:21:44 AM PDT by amihow (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird
Perversion is now acceptable.

It's beyond that. There are three levels of accommodation: tolerance, acceptance, and approval. We are now being forced by the government action to 'approve' of actions that run contrary to our basic moral compass, especially if we work for the federal government (and maybe a state government).

Under the law, we must 'tolerate' homosexuals that are "married" -- but it's come to the point that you risk your employment if you so much as express disapproval for the misapplication of the institution of marriage. So we are often required to tolerate, and even approve of homosexual marriage, and if we don't we risk our ability to make a living.

As for me, I will tolerate homosexual "married" couples to the extent I must under the law (I won't actively harass them or proselytize to them on a personal level when encountered in a job-related or casual setting). But I will NEVER approve of their "marriage" (meaning invite them into my circle of friends or acquaintances); nor will I EVER approve of their unholy "marriage" (heap praise on, or otherwise promote the perverse corruption of the institution of marriage).

Tolerate = You don't beat them up when you encounter them in a public or private setting. The minimum level of accommodation, under the law.

Accept = You don't mind if you meet and interact with them in a social setting, because you have no preference regarding their status. You don't take sides.

Approve: You are willing to help them advance the institution of homosexual marriage, such as by taking charge of activities that promote or celebrate the idea at your place of employment.

I hope you agree.

17 posted on 03/21/2016 9:29:25 AM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Accept men marrying men today and tomorrow they will be looking for us to accept a marriage of three people. Or bestiality. Or pedophilia.

Interesting that you say that, I seem to recall some here at FR defending homosexuals from any association with pedophiles or pedophilia. I think there is a link, though, and you can see it in pop culture, and even anticipate this behavior if you're in a social setting where they are present.

We must be wary if we leave our children entrusted to adults, in any setting where they are alone with them.

For example, I quit supporting the Boy Scouts after their leadership voted to allow homosexual Scoutmasters (their first mistake, even though there was a supreme court decision that protected them -- they did it because of perceived fundraising issues). It was an easy decision for me, and I had strong bonds to the institution as an Eagle scout.

18 posted on 03/21/2016 9:57:32 AM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

No surprise... Holland has allowed homo marriage since the early 2000s. The predominant experience is that allowing homo marriage did not create a society where homos actually marry (yes there are a few).... it instead created where every year since then, fewer and fewer of anybody gets married. In another decade at the going rate of decline, marriages will almost be unheard of. This is a fairly powerful argument against the commonly held meme which is that “what they do won’t affect me”.


19 posted on 03/21/2016 10:10:40 AM PDT by hecticskeptic (In life it's important to know what you believe�.but more more importantly, why you believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Marriage = One Man and One Woman Until Death Do Us Part


20 posted on 03/21/2016 2:29:32 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson